• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-53 of 3,778 results

Granting Respondent Apple, Inc's Motion to Compel Chip Schematics and Source Code [Motion Docket No. 1093-011] No. 657913

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657913-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
Moreover, even though on or about May 21, 2018 Qualcomm withdrew domestic industry claims with respect to the '674 patent, Staff contends that documents related to the '674 products are still relevant to this Investigation.
Having considered the voluminous materials that each of the Private Parties submitted in violation of the page limitations contained in the Grow1d Rules, it is evident that Apple is entitled to the information it seeks.
2 The Commission precedent generally follows Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and case law that any relevant information to a claim or defense is discoverable.
Any party seeking redactions to the public version must submit to this Office two (2) copies of a proposed public version of this document pursuant to Ground Rule 1.10 with red brackets and the word REDACTED, which clearly indicates any portion asserted to contain confidential business information, and consistent with the Commission's recent regulation.
.. �Jx� MaryJocNam;i; Administrative Law Judge 3 This means that if the Parties do not seek to have any portion of this Order redacted, they are still required to submit a statement to that effect.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Granting Complainant Qualcomm's Motions: to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Issued to Non-Party Intel Corporation [Motion Docket No. 1093-010], and Subpoenas Issued to Intel Empoyees Steven A. Bowers and Aichatou [Motion Docket No. 1093-016]; and Expediting Deadline for Proposed Redactions No. 657915

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657915-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
). Nonetheless, discovery requests may not be “unreasonably or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery already had in the case, and the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation.” l9 C.F.R. § ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Certifying Request to Commission for Judicial Enforcement of Three Subpoenas No. 657917

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657917-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
), Nonetheless, discovery requests may not be "umeasonably or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery already had in the case, and the impo1tance of the issues at stake in the litigation," 19 C.F.R. § ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Denying Qualcomm's Request for Additional Deposition time on Deposition Topics 83-87 and 89, and Additional Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 19, 21 -34, 41, 57 and 140-144 [Motion Docket No. 1093-013] No. 657912

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657912-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
Dr. Narathong also is a named inventor on the '336 patent, titled "Radio Frequency (RF) Front End Having Multiple Low Noise Amplifier Modules," which issued on October 18, 2016.
Dr. Narathong was asked questions generally directed toward Apple's alleged copying of the '336 patent in addition to the '356 patent, titled "Low Noise Amplifiers for Carrier Aggregation," wbich issued on October 6, 2015.
Any party seeking redactions to the public version must submit to this Office two (2) copies of a proposed public version of this document pursuant to Ground Rule 1.10 with red brackets clearly indicating any portion asserted to contain confidential business information.
The Parties' submissions may be made by facsimile and/or hard copy by the aforementioned date.
Mrury� Administrative Law Judge 1 This means that parties that do not seek to have any portion ofthis Order redacted are still required to submit a stateme}nt to this effect.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part Motion Docket Numbers 1093-033 and 1093-034 No. 657938

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657938-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
Staff supports the second part of Apple's MIL, to preclude Qualcomm's late assertions that Steinacker does not disclose the limitations recited in dependent claim 5.
As both Apple and Staff note, Dr. Alpert offered his opinion in his opening report that Steinacker teaches the limitations of claim 5 of the '674 patent.
All of Qualcomm' s documents that it intends to use or place into evidence that reference the disclosure that Steinacker teaches the limitations of claim 5 of the '674 patent should be redacted/stricken.
extent that they are part of file histories and are background references to explain the state of the art at the time of the alleged inventions, and also consistent with ApJ?le's Joint Statement language.
Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order each party shall submit to the Office of the Administrative Law Judges a statement as to whether or not it seeks to have any confidential portion of this document deleted from the public version.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Construing Certain Terms of the Asserted Claims of the Patents at Issue (Markman Claim Construction) No. 657924

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657924-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
None of the Paities has indicated in any of their filed documents that the person of ordinary skill in the ait definition is necessary or dispositive for construction of the disputed claim terms.
� Construction . . '336 Patent none '356 Patent '356: 1, 17 a first canier of the multiple caniers Plain and ordinary meaning, which is at least one canier of the multiple carriers included in the input RF signal '674 Patent none Page 1 of 1 ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Granting Apple Inc.'s Requst to Review Documents in Camera, and Scheduling Telephone Conference (Motion Docket No. 1093-013) No. 657923

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657923-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 4, 2018)
To expedite a resolution of the dispute between the Private Parties, I would like to review in camera the un-redacted versions of the 8 Apple documents.
Additionally, a Telephone Management Conference ("Teleconference") designed to
I request that the Office of Unfair Import Investigations ("Staff," and with
Qualcomm and Apple ''the Parties") contact Intel's counsel and convey this invitation.
realistically the impact that have had, and may have, on the Procedural discovery disputes Schedule.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Initial Determination Granting Complainant Qualcomm's Corrected Unopposed Motion for Partial Termination by Withdrawal of Claim 5 of The 674 Patent [Motion Docket No. 1093-044] No. 657636

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657636-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 3, 2018)
044] (October 3, 2018) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a), on September 27, 2018, Complainant Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm") filed a corrected third unopposed motion for partial termination of this Investigation ("Corrected Motion"), seeking termination of a single asserted patent claim ("Withdrawn Claim").
1 Qualcomm certifies pursuant to Ground Rule 2.2 that it met and conferred with Respondent Apple fnc.
Commission Rules permit a motion to terminate part of an investigation based upon withdrawal of certain allegations contained in the Complaint before issuance of the Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337.
An administrative law judge may grant said motion upon such terms and conditions as she deems proper.
denying Qualcomm's Corrected Motion seeking to terminate the Withdrawn Claim.2 Therefore, it is my Initial Determination that the Investigation should be partially terminated with respect to: claim 5 of the '674 patent, as asserted against Apple, and that Motion Docket No. 1093-044 be Figure 1 below shows patent claims that remain in this Investigation.3 granted.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Granting Qualcomm's Unopposed Motion to Correct Evidentiary Record Transcript and to Admit Certain Exhibits [Motion Docket Number 1093-045] No. 657467

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 657467-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Oct. 2, 2018)
(October 2, 2018) On October 1, 2018, Complainant Qualcomm Incorporated"(“Qualcomm”) filed an unopposed motion (“Motion”) to correct the evidentiary hearing transcript and to admit certain exhibits identified in Qualcomm’s Motion.
For good cause, and because Qualcomm’s 'Motion is , unopposed, Qualcomm’s Motion, Motion Docket No. 1093-045, is granted.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 656628-1

Document Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, 337-1016, No. 656628-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 24, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 656389-1

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 656389-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 20, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 655795-1

Document Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, 337-1016, No. 655795-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 14, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 655798-1

Document Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, 337-1016, No. 655798-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 14, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 655796-1

Document Certain Access Control Systems and Components Thereof, 337-1016, No. 655796-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 14, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 655559-1

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 655559-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 12, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>