UPONthe Affirmation of Matthew Petrozziello, Esq., dated July 24, 2024, and the Affirmation of Tillman Finley, dated July 24, 2024, together with the exhibits attached thereto, in support of the Order to Show Causefor the pro hac vice admission of Tillman Finley, andall prior pleadings and proceedings, «x

ORDEREDMatPlaintiff Regulus Group, LLC (“Plaintiff”) show cause axashearxag before this Court, at LA.S.

Part 60, Room 248, 60 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 on the 5thday of August , 2024 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an order pursuant to pursuantto § 520.11 of the rules of the New York Court of Appeals and 22 N.Y.C.R.R.

§ 805.3 to admit Tillman Finley, Esq. pro hac vice to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on behalf of Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and EmmanuelIrono, in the above-captioned matter, should not be entered; and it is uxher ORDERED,that a copyofthis order be served on Plaintiff, together with the papers upon which it is granted, on or before July26———__, 2024; andit is further ORDERED,that Opposition papers, if any, be served upon counsel for Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and EmmanualIrono,so as to be received on or before August2 _, 2024;andit is further ORDERKDxthavcospondanngpyrXIHAIOSEROXIPOCALKBAKOEEEOOTOIONOIT

ORDEREDthatthere will be no appearanceforthis application unless the court directs oral argument to be held virtually over Microsoft Teams.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, ~ 28, 29, 30 , were read on this motion to/for

In Motion Sequence No. 003, defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono move for an order admitting Tillman Finley, Esq. pro hacvice to represent them in this action.

Although the motion is unopposed,the court is constrained to deny it.

The applicant’s affirmation in support (Doc 25 [Finley Aff]), does not include the required language under CPLR 2106: , under the penalties of perjury under the ; “I affirm this ___ day of laws of New York, which may include a fine or imprisonment, that the foregoing is true, and I understand that this document maybefiled in an action or proceeding in a court of law.” Accordingly,it is ORDEREDthat Motion Sequence No. 003 is denied without prejudice to a new motion by Order to Show Cause on properpapers.

ET AL Motion No. 003 Page1 of 1

IRONO, SAVENT FINANCIAL, LLC d/b/a TVT LOANS, and DOES 1–50, Defendants.

Tillman Finley, Esq., having applied to this Court for admission pro hac vice to represent Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono (“Defendants”) in this action, and said applicant having submitted in support thereof an affirmation, of Matthew Petrozziello, Esq., a member of the Bar of the State of New York and attorney of record herein for Defendants, dated July 24, 2024, an affirmation of the applicant dated July 24, 2024, and Certificates of Good Standing from the jurisdictions in which the applicant was admitted to the practice of law, and the Court having reviewed the foregoing submissions and due deliberation having been had, it is now therefore:

ORDERED that the Motion is granted and Tillman Finley, Esq. is permitted to appear and to participate in this action on behalf of Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono; and it is further ORDERED that he shall at all times be associated herein with counsel who is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and is attorney of record for the parties in question and all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the court shall be signed by the attorney of record, who shall be held responsible for such papers and for the conduct of this action; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 602.2 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney hereby admitted pro hac vice shall abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon members of the New York Bar, including the Rules of the Courts governing the conduct of attorneys and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility; and it is further ORDERED that he shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course of his participation in this matter; and it is further ORDERED that said counsel shall notify the Court immediately of any matter or event in this or any other jurisdiction which affects his standing as a member of the Bar.

Date ________________

UPON the Affirmation of Matthew Petrozziello, Esq., dated July 24, 2024, and the Affirmation of Tillman Finley, dated July 24, 2024, together with the exhibits attached thereto, in support of the Order to Show Cause for the pro hac vice admission of Tillman Finley, and all prior pleadings and proceedings, it is hereby

ORDERED, that Plaintiff Regulus Group, LLC (“Plaintiff”) show cause at a hearing before this Court, at I.A.S.

Part 60, Room 248, 60 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 on the ___day of ________________, 2024 at _________ a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an order pursuant to pursuant to § 520.11 of the rules of the New York Court of Appeals and 22 N.Y.C.R.R.

§ 805.3 to admit Tillman Finley, Esq. pro hac vice to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on behalf of Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono, in the above-captioned matter, should not be entered; and it is further ORDERED, that a copy of this order be served on Plaintiff, together with the papers upon which it is granted, on or before ____________ ___, 2024; and it is further ORDERED, that Opposition papers, if any, be served upon counsel for Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanual Irono, so as to be received on or before ____________ ___, 2024; and it is further

ORDERED, that responding papers, if any, be served upon Plaintiff so as to be received on or before ____________ ___, 2024.

Chambers of Leda Dunn Wettre United States Magistrate Judge To: All counsel of record

An initial scheduling conference shall be conducted telephonically on September 24, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre.

Therefore, counsel shall immediately exchange the following information without a formal discovery request: - - - - - identities of individuals likely to have knowledge of discoverable facts; documents and things in the possession of counsel or the party; identities of experts and their opinions; insurance agreements in force; and statement(s) of the basis for any damages claimed.

Counsel may submit unopposed applications for pro hac vice admission to Chambers.

At the conference, all parties who are not appearing pro se must be represented by counsel who shall have full authority to bind their clients in all pretrial matters.

aaaae ON weeeeeeeeeex Defendant.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12, 14 were read on this motion to/for

The motionis granted in full with leave to replead that part of the breach of contract concerning failure to cooperate per the reasoning ofthe record of 7/16/2023.

ET AL Motion No. 001 Page 1 of 2

Tillman Finley, Esq., having applied to this Court for admission pro hac vice to represent Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono (“Defendants”) in this action, and said applicant having submitted in support thereof an affirmation, of Matthew Petrozziello, Esq., a member of the Bar of the State of New York and attorney of record herein for Defendants, dated July 11, 2024, an affirmation of the applicant dated July 11, 2024, and Certificates of Good Standing from the jurisdictions in which the applicant was admitted to the practice of law, and the Court having reviewed the foregoing submissions and due deliberation having been had, it is now therefore:

ORDERED that the Motion is granted and Tillman Finley, Esq. is permitted to appear and to participate in this action on behalf of Defendants Motir Services, Inc. and Emmanuel Irono; and it is further ORDERED that he shall at all times be associated herein with counsel who is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and is attorney of record for the parties in question and all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the court shall be signed by the attorney of record, who shall be held responsible for such papers and for the conduct of this action; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 602.2 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney hereby admitted pro hac vice shall abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon members of the New York Bar, including the Rules of the Courts governing the conduct of attorneys and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility; and it is further ORDERED that he shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course of his participation in this matter; and it is further ORDERED that said counsel shall notify the Court immediately of any matter or event in this or any other jurisdiction which affects his standing as a member of the Bar.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number(Motion 002) 15, 16, 17, 18 were read on this motion to/for

Joel Meyer, Esq., having applied to this court for admission pro hac vice to represent plaintiff Regulus Group, LLC inthis action, and said applicant having submitted in support thereof an affirmation, of Joseph A. Matteo, Esq., a member of the Bar of the State of New York and attorney of record herein for plaintiff Regulus Group, LLC, an affirmation of the applicant dated June 18, 2024, and a Certificate of Good Standing from the jurisdiction in which the applicant was admitted to the practice of law, and the court having reviewed the foregoing submissions and due deliberation having been had,it is now therefore ORDEREDthat the motion is granted and Joel Meyer, Esq. is permitted to appear and to participate in this action on behalf of plaintiff Regulus Group, LLC; andit is further ORDEREDthathe shall at all times be associated herein with counsel who is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and is attorney of record for the party in question and all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the court shall be signed by the 650604/2024 REGULUS GROUP,LLC, vs. MOTIR SERVICES, INC.

ET AL Motion No. 002 Page 1 of 2

attorney of record, whoshall be held responsible for such papers and for the conductofthis action; andit is further ORDEREDthat, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 602.2 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney hereby admitted pro hac vice shall abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon members of the New York Bar, including the Rules of the Courts governing the conduct of attorneys and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility; andit is further ORDEREDthat he shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course ofhis participation in this matter; andit is further ORDEREDthatsaid counsel shall notify the court immediately of any matter or event in this or any other jurisdiction which affects his standing as a memberofthe Bar.

[_] Rererence 650604/2024 REGULUS GROUP, LLC, vs. MOTIR SERVICES, INC.

This matter having come before the Court by stipulation of plaintiff, REGULUS GROUP, LLC, and defendants, MOTIR SERVICES, INC, EMMANUEL IRONO, and SAVENT FINANCIAL, LLC d/b/a/ TVT LOANS (individually “Party” and collectively “Parties”) for the entry of a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103(a), limiting the review, copying, dissemination and filing of confidential and/or proprietary documents and information to be produced by either party and their respective counsel or by any non-party in the course of discovery in this matter to the extent set forth below; and the parties, by, between and among their respective counsel, having stipulated and agreed to the terms set forth herein, and good cause having been shown; IT IS hereby ORDERED that:

This Stipulation is being entered into to facilitate the production, exchange and discovery of documents and information that the Parties and, as appropriate, non-parties, agree merit confidential treatment (hereinafter the “Documents” or “Testimony”).

Any deposition witness who is given access to Confidential Information shall, prior thereto, be provided with a copy of this Stipulation and shall execute a written agreement, in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, to comply with and be bound by its terms.

A Party or, as appropriate, non-party, who seeks to file with the Court (i) any deposition transcripts, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, or other documents which have previously been designated as comprising or containing Confidential Information, or (ii) any pleading, brief or memorandum which reproduces, paraphrases or discloses Confidential Information shall file the document, pleading, brief, or memorandum on the NYSCEF system in redacted form until the Court renders a decision on any motion to seal (the “Redacted Filing”).

This Stipulation may be changed by further order of this Court, and is without prejudice to the rights of a Party to move for relief from any of its provisions, or to seek or agree to different or additional protection for any particular material or information.

Joel Meyer, Esq., having applied to this court for admission pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff, Regulus Group, LLC in this action, and said applicant having submitted in support thereof an affirmation, of Joseph A. Matteo, Esq., a member of the Bar of the State of New York and attorney of record herein for Regulus Group, LLC, dated June 18, 2024, an affirmation of the applicant dated June 18, 2024, and a Certificate of Good Standing from the jurisdiction in which the applicant was admitted to the practice of law, and the court having reviewed the foregoing submissions and due deliberation having been had, it is now therefore ORDERED that the motion is granted and Joel Meyer, Esq. is permitted to appear and to participate in this action on behalf of Regulus Group, LLC; and it is further ORDERED that he/she shall at all times be associated herein with counsel who is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and is attorney of record for the party in question and all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the court shall be signed by the attorney of record, who shall be held responsible for such papers and for the conduct of this action; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 602.2 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney hereby admitted pro hac vice shall abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon members of the New York Bar, including the Rules of the Courts governing the conduct of attorneys and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility; and it is further ORDERED that he/she shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course of his participation in this matter; and it is further ORDERED that said counsel shall notify the court immediately of any matter or event in this or any other jurisdiction which affects his/her/their standing as a member of the Bar.

Date: ________________________

Uponthe foregoing documents, it is ORDEREDthatplaintiff's motion seeking entry of a default judgmentis denied.

A motion for default judgment must be supported by either the affidavit of the party or a verified complaint (CPLR 3215[f]).

Here, the complaintis not verified, and plaintiff did not submit a party affidavit in support of its motion.

Denial is without prejudice to renewal upon submission of the requisite supporting documentation.

655181/2023 GT BIOPHARMA, INC. vs. TWF GLOBAL, LLC ET AL Motion No. 002 Page 1 of 1