Appellants were instructed to submit a designation of record, a statement of issues specific to each appeal, and a brief consistent with the applicable rules, or they risk dismissal.

Appellants initially failed to timely file a designation of record with a statement of the issues specific to each appeal and a brief consistent with the applicable rules.

In their response, Appellants claim their “statement of issues specific and relevant to this appeal” was presented in their reply letter (ECF No. 6 at 3), which, again, was singly submitted in support of all appeals.

Appellants’ failure to submit a fully compliant designation of record, appeal-specific statement of the issues and corresponding, relevant transcript containing the Bankruptcy Court’s findings, conclusions, and reasoning for denying Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration has prevented this Court from conducting an “informed, substantive appellate review,” and therefore warrants dismissal of the appeal.

5 Appellants received notice of possible dismissal for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (see ECF No. 4), yet again, failed to file a designation of record and statement of facts specific to this appeal.

Having reviewed the submissions filed in connection with this appeal and having declined to hold oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b), for the

The Bankruptcy Court granted Appellants’ Payoff Motion, in part, on the record.3 On June 15, 2022, Judge Sherwood entered an order, in relevant part, determining: (1) Wilmington Trust was owed between $1,559,989.01 and $1,626,979.65 less certain credits for adequate protection payments; (2) MEB was owed $537,512.21 less certain credits for adequate protection payments; and (3) Appellants were authorized to borrow $2,165,491.86 from Advisors

Appellants were instructed to submit a designation of record, a statement of issues specific to each appeal, and a brief consistent with the applicable rules, or they risk dismissal.

In re Samson., 726 F. App’x at 164 (citing Caterbone, 640 F.3d at 110-12)); Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 213 (2007) (finding Appellant’s failure to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the governing statute deprived the reviewing court of subject matter jurisdiction).

While this Court acknowledges Appellants difficulties in proceeding pro so, “there are no equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements such as the one governing the time to appeal final orders of bankruptcy courts.” Id. at 165 (citing In re Sobczack-Slomczewski, 826 F.3d 429, 432 (7th Cir. 2016); Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214).

Defendants P^;f-x!

a, 6,n fl[S r.,,n{t ,r.-'srp,... Court of the Countv oI SLTFFOLK in the Slate ol New Yor\.

District: 0200 Section:978.80 Block: 05.00 Lot: 019.000 The plaintiff, MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. , by its attorneys, FEIN SUCH & CRANE, LLP, having duly moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 3217(b) and 6514(a) directing that the above entitled action be discontinued, and the motion having regularly come on to be heard, Now, upon reading and filing the notice of motion dated November 7, 2022, the affirmation of VICTOR SPINELLI.

ESQ. in support of the motion, sworn to on November 7,2022, the pleadings in the above entitled action, and aller due deliberation having been held thereon, Now, upon motion of FEIN, SUCH & CRANE, LLP, attorneys for plaintifi it is ORDERED that the motion be and the same is hereby in all respects granted, and that the above entitled action be and the same is hereby discontinued; and it is further ORDERED that the Notice of Pendency of this action, originally filed in the Office of the Clerk of SUFFOLK County on January 15, 2016, for the real property located at 30 HOLLYWOOD DRI\,E, SHIRLEY, NY I 1967, and designated on the County of SUFFOLK tax map as District: 0200 , Section 978.80, Block 05.00, Lot 019.000, be cancelled; and it is further ORDERED, that the Order Granting Summary Judgment and Appointing Referee to Compute entered on March 14,7019, be Vacated ; and the Clerk is directed to mark the records accordingly, and it is further ORDERED, that the Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale entered May 27, 2020, be Vacated; and the Clerk is directed to mark the records accordingly, and it is further ORDERED, that KEYIN JOHNSTON, Esq., the Referee appointed pursuant to the Order Granting Summary Judgment and Order Confirming Referee Report and Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, be and is hereby relieved and discharged of any and all obligations and requirements thereunder; and it is further ORDERED that the above-referenced action be and the same is hereby discontinued without costs to either party as against the other; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the County of SUFFOLK be and is hereby directed to cancel the Notice of Pendency of this action filed by the plaintiff herein on January 15, 2016, and to make a note to that effect on the margin of the record of referring to this order

Clerk of Suffolk CountY

Srrprerne @orrfi of tbe $tste of 9eb porh @ount, of $rrttoltr lJfl$ #attXTL fi[emot,rrrlurn Becigion

FEIN, SUCH & CRANE, LLP Attomeys for the Plaintiff 1400 Old Country Road, Suite I 03N Westbury, NY I1590

Referee l5 Bond Lane Brookhaven, NY 117!9 The Plaintiff, MTGLQ Investors, L.P., has moved for an order canceling the Notice of Pendency, vacating the Judgment of Foreclosure and sale and discontinuing the instant actlon This is a residential mortgage foreclosure action against 30 Hollywood Drive, Shirley, New York I 1967.

On March 13th, 2020 the court granted Judgment of Foreclosure MTGLQ v Coiro 60066112016 and Sale to the Plaintiff (Doc. 9l).

An affirmation by Plaintifls counsel states that on October 26,d,2022 the premises was sold and the Plaintiff accepted a Short Sale Payoff (Doc. 100, para.6).