• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 9-23 of 1,573 results

STATE OF OHIO - vs- MOREHEAD, NATALIE ANNE MAS

Docket 2020 CR 00618, Ohio State, Mahoning County, Court of Common Pleas (Oct. 8, 2020)
SWEENEY, MAUREEN A., presiding
Case TypeCriminal - Common Pleas
TagsCriminal, Common Pleas
DEFENDANT MOREHEAD, NATALIE ANNE
OTHER ALLIANCE MUNICIPAL COURT
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY GAINS, PAUL J.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Alito

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Alito (U.S. Jun. 29, 2023)
As origi- nally enacted, Title VII did not spell out what it meant by discrimina- tion “because of ... religion.” Subsequent regulations issued by the EEOC obligated employers “to make reasonable accommodations to the religious needs of employees” whenever doing so would not create “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” 29 CFR §1605.1 (1968).
quoted sentence: “To require TWA to bear more than a de minimis cost in order to give Hardison Saturdays off is an undue hardship.” Alt- hough many lower courts later viewed this line as the authoritative interpretation of the statutory term “undue hardship,” the context ren- ders that reading doubtful.
It noted that Title VII expressly provides special protection for “‘bona fide seniority ... sys- tem[s],’” id., at 81–82 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §2000e–2(h)), and it cited precedent reading the statute “‘to make clear that —————— ordinary meaning of “undue hardship” and “more than ... de minimis” led some to interpret the decision to rest on Establishment Clause con- cerns.
The Government agrees, noting that “‘undue hard- ship means something greater than hardship.’ ” Brief for United States 30; see id., at 39 (arguing that “accommoda- tions should be assessed while ‘keep[ing] in mind both words in the key phrase of the actual statutory text: “un- due” and “hardship”’” (quoting Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweet- eners, LLC, 721 F. 3d 444, 456 (CA7 2013)).
What matters more than a favored synonym for “undue hardship” (which is the actual text) is that courts must ap- ply the test in a manner that takes into account all relevant factors in the case at hand, including the particular accom- modations at issue and their practical impact in light of the nature, “size and operating cost of [an] employer.” Brief for United States 40 (internal quotation marks omitted).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. Order-10-26-23

Document Jonathan Morris v. Chad Wolf, 21-55860 (9th Cir. Oct. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

USA v. Jonathan Morris

Docket 16-11129, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (July 25, 2016)
Plaintiff - Appellee United States of America
Defendant - Appellant Jonathan Morris (Federal Prisoner: #53808-177)
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy - Proof of Service

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy, Proof of Service (U.S. Mar. 23, 2023)
v. [See Attached Service List] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 22-174 GERALD E. GROFF, PETITIONER
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy - Main Document

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 23, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy - Main Document

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief of respondent Louis DeJoy, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 23, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Gerald E Groff filed - Main Document

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Reply of petitioner Gerald E Groff filed, Main Document (U.S. Apr. 7, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of petitioner Gerald E Groff filed - Proof of Service

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Reply of petitioner Gerald E Groff filed, Proof of Service (U.S. Apr. 7, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Letter filed Distributed - Main Document

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Letter filed Distributed, Main Document (U.S. Apr. 7, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amici curiae of Americans United - Certificate of Word Count

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief amici curiae of Americans United, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Mar. 30, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for - Main Document

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 30, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of The Freedom from - Certificate of Word Count

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief amicus curiae of The Freedom from, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Mar. 30, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of The American - Proof of Service

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief amicus curiae of The American, Proof of Service (U.S. Mar. 30, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amici curiae of National Rural - Certificate of Word Count

Document Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, 22-174, Brief amici curiae of National Rural, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Mar. 30, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... >>