• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 1,203 results

Judgment Issued - Main Document

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Judgment Issued, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 2, 2024)
Supreme Court of the United States
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI to the United States Court of Appeals for the
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioners, Ashley Moody, Attorney
General of Florida, et al., recover from NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., Three Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-three Dollars and Eight Cents ($3,473.08) for costs herein expended.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of United States - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of United States, Proof of Service (U.S. Aug. 14, 2023)
No. 22-277, 22-393 and 22-555 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ASHLEY MOODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. NETCHOICE, LLC, DBA NET CHOICE, ET AL. NETCHOICE, LLC, DBA NET CHOICE, ET AL., CROSS-PETITIONERS v.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of United States - Main Document

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of United States, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 14, 2023)
And the court concluded that it is 7 “substantially likely that none of S.B. 7072’s content- moderation restrictions survive intermediate—let alone strict—scrutiny.” Id. at 57a.
NetChoice nonetheless contends (Paxton Pet. 28-32; Moody Cross-Pet. 28-34) that this Court should consider its challenges to those provisions.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208689514 REPLY [2089361] filed by Talia Cadet, Brian Firebaugh, Steven King, Timothy Martin, Chloe Joy ...

Document TikTok Inc., et al v. Merrick Garland, 24-1113, No. 01208689514 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 12, 2024)
The government does not dispute that even the temporary loss of TikTok will irreparably harm Petitioners—disrupting the forum they rely on for community, expression, information, entertainment, and in some instances, their livelihood.
The government also does not dispute that this case presents unprecedented questions of significant constitutional magnitude, or that our country has a rich and long history and tradition of permitting the free exchange of expression unfettered by legal restrictions.
v. McPherson, 797 F.2d 1062, 1073 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (staying enforcement of agency decision to withhold funding from plaintiff and redistribute funds to others); Satiacum v. Laird, 475 F.2d 320, 321 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (enjoining Arlington Memorial Cemetery officers from restraining plaintiff from holding services there pending appeal).
And it is a standard practice of the federal courts of USCA Case #24-1130 Document #2089361 Filed: 12/12/2024 Page 5 of 8
appeals to issue orders maintaining the status quo on the ground pending Supreme Court review.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al - Main Document

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al, Main Document (U.S. Feb. 15, 2024)
This Court would have none of it, distinguishing FAIR and reaffirming that those who organize and display speech are protected by the First Amendment.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al - Certificate of Word Count

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Feb. 15,...
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 5,982 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoingis true andcorrect.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 15th day of February 2024.
< a byt, ‘ District of Columbia My commission expires September30, 2027. i?
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Reply of respondents Netchoice LLC et al, Proof of Service (U.S. Feb. 15, 2024)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 15, 2024, three (3) copies of the REPLY BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTSin the above-captioned case were served, as required by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:
1115 H Street, N.E.
District of Columbia
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of American - Main Document

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of American, Main Document (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
None of these items has anything to do with HB 20’s viewpoint discrimination prohibition or NetChoice’s concept of absolute First Amendment protection of “editorial discretion.” Quoted in full, both Franklin’s Autobiography and the ...
None of those conditions is present here.
Similarly, transportation providers may eject vulgar or disorderly passengers, yet States may 22 nonetheless impose common carrier regulations prohibiting discrimination on more invidious grounds.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of American - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of American, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
I, Loree Chow, being duly sworn according to law and being over the age of 18, upon my oath depose and say that:
An electronic version was also served by email to each individual.
That on the same date as above, I sent to this Court forty copies of the within Brief of Amicus Curiae American Principles Project in Support of Petitioners in No. 22- 277 and Respondent in No. 22-555 through Federal Express, by Overnight Mail, postage prepaid.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026 #326038
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Amicus Populi - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of Amicus Populi, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
Briefs and Records Supreme Court of the United States United States Courts of Appeals
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of American - Certificate of Word Count

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of American, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 6,154 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this 23rd day of January, 2024.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 23rd day of January, 2024.
Mariana Braylovskiy Notary Public State of New York No. 01BR6004935 Qualified in Richmond County Commission Expires March 30, 2026
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Donald W Landry - Certificate of Word Count

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of Donald W Landry, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jan. 23, 20...
Briefs and Records Supreme Court of the United States United States Courts of Appeals
As required by Supreme Court Rule 33. l(h), I certify that the Amicus Curiae Brief of Donald W. Landry in Support of the Attorneys General contains 3,362 words, excluding the parts of the Brief that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.l(d).
(800) 890.5001 www.beckergallagher.com 8790 Governor's Hill Drive Suite 102 Cincinnati, Ohio 45249 Franklin Square 1300 I Street, NW, Suite 400E Washington, DC 20005
State of Ohio County of Hamilton I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires February 14, 2028
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Center for - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of Center for, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
I, Renee Goss, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 23rd day of January, 2024, send out from Omaha, NE 4 package(s) containing 3 copies of the BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL
Packages were plainly addressed to the following:
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Notary Public Affiant 44318
Attorneys for Respondent Aaron Lloyd Nielson Counsel of Record Office of the Texas Attorney General P.O.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amici curiae of iTexasPolitics LLC - Proof of Service

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amici curiae of iTexasPolitics LLC, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 23, 2024)
I, Renee Goss, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 23rd day of January, 2024, send out from Omaha, NE 6 package(s) containing * copies of the BRIEF OF
I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.
Attorneys for Respondents Paul D. Clement Counsel of Record *3 copies Party name: Netchoice, LLC, et al.
Solicitor General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001
Elizabeth B. Prelogar Counsel of Record *1 copy Party name: United States
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Eric Rasmusen - Certificate of Word Count

Document Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., Petitioners v. NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., 22-277, Brief amicus curiae of Eric Rasmusen, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jan. 23, 202...
January 23, 2024 Clerk Supreme Court of the United States 1 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20002
Dear Sir or Madam: As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the Brief of Amicus Curiae Eric Rasmusen referenced above contains 7,150 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Sincerely, Jack Suber, Esq.
Notary Public State of Maryland Montgomery County My commission exp.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>