JUDGE: William Thomas Sergio Guardazzi et al Plaintiff(s) vs. Palta Groves, Inc. et al Defendant(s) ____________________________/

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on February 5, 2025 on Defendants’ Motion for Continuance of Trial, and upon the same having been considered, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Defendants’ Motion for Continuance of Trial is hereby DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 9th day of February, 2025.

Electronically Signed Case No: 2023-027027-CA-01 Page 1 of 2

Calendar Call on Zoom/Virtual Defendant(s) ______________________________________/ THIS CAUSE is hereby set for jury trial before the undersigned Judge at the Dade County Courthouse, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130, Room _________ for the ____ week period commencing: _______________________________, or as soon thereafter as the same may be heard.

(Zoom provided by Judicial Assistant) All attorneys appearing at the Calendar Call shall be thoroughly familiar with the cause and be prepared to consider and determine such matters as are set forth in Fla. R. Civ.

You will receive an email from the Court with the information you need to connect to your event by video or phone if you are on the E- Filing Portal service list.

administration of this matter, they are encouraged to meet and develop a joint stipulated order and/or set a case management conference pursuant to Fla. R. Civ.

Please contact Aliean Simpkins, the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court’s ADA Coordinator, Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center, 175 NW 1st Ave., Suite 2400, Miami, FL 33128, Telephone (305)

THIS CAUSE, having been agreed upon by the parties, and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

The deadline for the Parties to file their proposed orders on Defendants’ Motion For Clarification shall be extended to Tuesday, January 21, 2025.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 20th day of January, 2025.

No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION

Electronically Served: Case No: 2021-016939-CA-01 Page 1 of 2

THIS CAUSE came before the court without a hearing, on the joint Stipulation of Settlement filed by the parties on January 16, 2025, and the Court having considered the same, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above cause and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to the Defendant, Enca Group, LLC only.

This action shall remain pending against Defendant, Gustavo E. Tello.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 17th day of January, 2025.

Electronically Signed Case No: 2023-025508-CA-01 Page 1 of 2

Final Order as to All Parties SRS #: 12 (Other)

THIS CAUSE came before the court without a hearing, on the joint Stipulation of Settlement filed by the parties on January 16, 2025, and the Court having considered the same, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above cause and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to the Defendant, Enca Group, LLC only.

This action shall remain pending against Defendant, Gustavo E. Tello.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 17th day of January, 2025.

Electronically Signed Case No: 2023-025508-CA-01 Page 1 of 2

Final Order as to All Parties SRS #: 12 (Other)

the Court upon Defendant’s, PANEUROPEAN THIS CAUSE came before INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS, LLC’S (“Paneuropean”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s, BEST MERIDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida corporation (“Plaintiff”) Verified Complaint, and the Court being advised that Plaintiff and Paneuropean are in agreement as to the form and content of this Order, having reviewed the file, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

Paneuropean’s Motion to Dismiss them from Counts I, III and VI is GRANTED as Plaintiff stipulates that it is not seeking any relief against Paneuropean in those counts.

Plaintiff has stipulated that the only relief it seeks against Paneuropean in Count II is the request that the Court determine the priority of any liens.

Plaintiff stipulates that as to Count II, it is not seeking monetary relief, legal fees or costs from Paneuropean.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 15th day of January, 2025.

JUDGE: William Thomas Sergio Guardazzi et al Plaintiff(s) vs. Palta Groves, Inc. et al Defendant(s) ____________________________/

THIS MATTER came before the Court on January 7, 2025 for a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Partial Summary Judgment and Counter-Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Summary Judgment on Counterclaim (collectively, the “Motions”).

The Court having reviewed the relevant portions of the record, having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

If the parties are unable to resolve this matter at mediation, the Court shall then enter its Orders on each of the two Motions.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 14th day of January, 2025.

... provided that a party is not required to provide computations as to noneconomic damages, but the party must identify categories of damages claimed and provide supporting documents ...

This matter came before the Court on Defendants Michael Lyman’s and Bari Lyman’s Motion to Tax Costs.

The parties having agreed and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Judgment in the amount of $3,659.50 is hereby entered in favor of Michael Lyman and Bari Lyman, 26225 SW 152 Avenue, Homestead, Florida 33032, and against Helen Cabrales, 26363 SW 152 Avenue, Homestead, Florida 33032, which judgment shall bear interest at the legal rate, and for which let execution issue forthwith.

If the judgment amount is paid in full by February 9, 2025, no interest shall accrue.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 10th day of January, 2025.

This matter came before the Court on Defendants Michael Lyman’s and Bari Lyman’s Motion to Tax Costs.

The parties having agreed and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Judgment in the amount of $3,659.50 is hereby entered in favor of Michael Lyman and Bari Lyman, 26225 SW 152 Avenue, Homestead, Florida 33032, and against Helen Cabrales, 26363 SW 152 Avenue, Homestead, Florida 33032, which judgment shall bear interest at the legal rate, and for which let execution issue forthwith.

If the judgment amount is paid in full by February 9, 2025, no interest shall accrue.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 10th day of January, 2025.

THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on December 19, 2024, on Counterclaimants’ Motion for Entry of Partial Summary Judgment as to the Counterclaim (the “Motion”).

excessive noise and that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant paid the fines associated with the citations, the Court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact that would preclude entry of summary judgment in favor of Counterclaimants.

Standard for Summary Judgment In In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, the Florida Supreme Court adopted the summary judgment standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), and its progeny.

When a party fails to make such a showing on an essential element, “there can be ‘no genuine [dispute] as to any material fact,’ because a complete failure of proof concerning an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case necessarily renders all other facts immaterial.” Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 323.

The Court reserves jurisdiction to determine an award of taxable costs to Counterclaimants as the prevailing parties, upon the filing of a motion.

THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing on December 19, 2024, on Counterclaimants’ Motion for Entry of Partial Summary Judgment as to the Counterclaim (the “Motion”).

excessive noise and that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant paid the fines associated with the citations, the Court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact that would preclude entry of summary judgment in favor of Counterclaimants.

Standard for Summary Judgment In In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, the Florida Supreme Court adopted the summary judgment standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), and its progeny.

When a party fails to make such a showing on an essential element, “there can be ‘no genuine [dispute] as to any material fact,’ because a complete failure of proof concerning an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case necessarily renders all other facts immaterial.” Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 323.

The Court reserves jurisdiction to determine an award of taxable costs to Counterclaimants as the prevailing parties, upon the filing of a motion.

This Cause is hereby reset for Jury/Non-Jury trial before the undersigned Judge in the Dade County Courthouse, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130, for the ____ week period commencing ____________ or as soon the same may be thereafter as heard.

ALL ATTORNEYS are directed to appear before the undersigned Judge, at the the Calendar and pretrial conference on Dade County Courthouse, for Call of _________________________ .

Lender West, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Co. James R Kennett et al 02-24-2025 at 9:30 AM

If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance.

Please contact Aliean Simpkins, the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court’s ADA Coordinator, Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center, 175 NW 1st Ave., Suite 2400, Miami, FL 33128, Telephone (305)

YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR before the undersigned Judge for a Case Management Conference, in accordance with Rule 1.200(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, on Date/Time: January 8th, 2025 at 03:00 PM Location: Zoom Video Conference The Court intends to specifically address the following Motion/Matter: Case Management Conference (Motions In Limine - ALL Trial Counsel of Record MUST Appear) In addition, the parties shall be prepared to argue and address all pending motions and issues in the case, including time-frame to complete discovery, for filing dispositive motions, and trial setting.

This Case Management Conference may not be cancelled without the Court’s written permission.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 3rd day of January, 2025.

No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION

If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance.