• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-53 of 3,272 results

Application to extend the time to file a - Proof of Service

Document Steven Antonius, aka Sealed Defendant 1, Shervington Lovell, aka Sealed Defendant 1, and Argemiro Zapata-Castro, aka Sealed Defendant 1, Petitioners v. United States, 23-6971, Application...
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

USA v. Kidd

Docket 1:18-cr-00872, New York Southern District Court (Dec. 11, 2018)
Judge Victor Marrero, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF
Defendant Lloyd Kidd
Plaintiff USA
Kidd
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Estevez

Docket 1:18-cr-00669, New York Southern District Court (Sept. 18, 2018)
Judge J. Paul Oetken, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Jeffrey Estevez
Defendant Adonis Ramirez
Defendant David Garcia
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Gonzalez et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00601, New York Southern District Court (Aug. 21, 2018)
Judge Paul G. Gardephe, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Godofredo Leandro Gonzalez
Defendant Luis Rafael Febres Monasterio
Defendant Murvin Reigoud Maikel
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Ashirova

Docket 1:18-cr-00509, New York Southern District Court (July 19, 2018)
Judge George B. Daniels, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Diyora Ashirova
Defendant Elvin Baghir-Pur
Defendant Kirill Dedusev
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Hartley et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00390, New York Southern District Court (June 4, 2018)
DivisionFoley Square
Deadline(Status Conference set for 4/11/2025 at 03:15 PM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer., Conference before D.J. on 4/11/2025 at 3:15 PM. (Status Conference set for 4/11/2025 at 03:15 PM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
USA
Hartley
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Robinson et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00364, New York Southern District Court (May 22, 2018)
Judge Paul G. Gardephe, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF, PRIOR
Defendant Tyreek Robinson
Defendant Michael Toppin
Defendant Antoine Slaughter
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

USA v. Kearse, et al.

Docket 1:18-cr-00263, New York Southern District Court (Apr. 4, 2018)
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF
Defendant Raking Kearse
Defendant Lorenzo Babrow
Plaintiff USA
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 549 ORDER as to Jowenky Nunez, Jr, Brian Hernandez, Iyaury Rodriguez-Rosario: The final pretrial ...

Document USA v. Nunez et al, 1:22-cr-00293, No. 549 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2025)
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The final pretrial conference scheduled for March 31, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. will take place in Courtroom 318 in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, as will the trial.
The Court intends to sit for trial from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday of each week, and not sit on Fridays, for the duration of the trial until deliberations begin.
Dated: March 25, 2025 New York, New York
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 548 ORDER as to Jowenky Nunez, Jr.: Esere J. Onaodowan, Esq., counsel for Jowenky Nunez, is appointed ...

Document USA v. Nunez et al, 1:22-cr-00293, No. 548 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2025)
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Esere J. Onaodowan, Esq., counsel for Jowenky Nunez, is appointed to represent Mr. Nunez under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C § 3006A (“CJA”), seeks approval for the use of CJA funds to purchase a laptop to enable this client who is detained to review discovery materials produced by the Government.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defense counsel’s request for CJA funds to purchase a laptop and any subsequent external drives that may be required to provide the defendant with access to the discovery (collectively, the “Electronic Device”) for purposes of defendant’s discovery review is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel shall provide the Electronic Devise(s) to Dave Damo of Data Mill, to disable the wireless and printing capabilities of the Electronic Device and disable any other applications on the computer in a manner acceptable to the facility in which the defendant is lodged.
The Government will forward the loaded Electronic Device(s) to the appropriate liaison officer at the detention facility where the defendant is detained.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant may not use the Electronic Device for any purpose other than reviewing discovery materials produced in this case, for communicating with his CJA counsel, and for other communications relating to his defense in this case.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 152 FILED JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE as to Grei Mendez (2), Count(s) 1, 1s, 2, 2s, 3s, Dismissed; ...

Document USA v. Herrera Garcia et al, 1:23-cr-00504, No. 152 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2025)
D The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's determination that you pose a low risk of future substance abuse.
as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense.
You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon (i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to another person such as nunchakus or tasers).
fine D restitution is modified as follows: D the interest requirement for the D * Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-299.
* * * Findings for the total amount of losses are required under Chapters I 09A, 110, 11 OA, and 113A of Title 18 for offenses committed on or after September 13, 1994, but before April 23, 1996.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 216 MEMORANDUM & ORDER as to (16-Cr-453-3) Stefan Van Der End

Document USA v. Dow et al, 1:16-cr-00453, No. 216 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2025)
On May 24, 2016, the United States Coast Guard detained Van Der End, a citizen of the Netherlands, and two other foreign nationals on board a sailboat carrying approximately 1,300 kilograms of cocaine from Grenada to Canada.
After boarding the sailboat and discovering bales of cocaine stored throughout the vessel, the Coast Guard officers noticed that water had begun leaking into the boat from a large pipe that had been cut while Van Der End was below deck.
In short, the Second Circuit already concluded on direct appeal that the government presented sufficient evidence of the sailboat’s statelessness to sustain a conviction under the MDLEA, even without an admission from Van Der End on this issue.
However, Van Der End himself recognizes that the Second Circuit’s guidance that “trial courts might be well advised ... to submit the issue of jurisdiction over the vessel to the jury” before proceeding to trial in an MDLEA case, Prado, 933 F.3d at 139 n.9, was merely a “suggest[ion]” rather than an established jury right (Pet. at 22).
As for the obstruction-of-justice enhancement, the record clearly supports the inference that Van Der End cut a large pipe on the sailboat to scuttle the vessel and prevent the Coast Guard from recovering an additional twenty-two bales of cocaine as evidence.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 533 OPINION AND ORDER Jowenky Nunez, Jr, et al

Document USA v. Nunez et al, 1:22-cr-00293, No. 533 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2025)
The court explained that this is analogous to the doctrine of “ratification”: “just as a minor legally incapable of entering a contract may nonetheless be found to have ‘ratified’ a contract by taking actions after attaining majority consistent ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1638 ORDER as to (21-Cr-603-16) Sebastian Telfair

Document USA v. WILLIAMS, 1:21-cr-00603, No. 1638 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the February 19, 2025, conference will take place in Judge Caproni’s new courtroom: Courtroom 20C of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, 10007.
Dated: February 12, 2025 New York, NY
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 2457 ORDER granting 2451 Motion as to (10-Cr-905-36) Ariel Pena. Mr. Pena has moved, pro se, for ...

Document USA v. Rodriguez-Perez et al, 1:10-cr-00905, No. 2457 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2025)
“Rather, full compliance with the terms of supervised release is what is expected of the defendant and does not warrant early termination.” United States v. Olivieri, 72 F. Supp.
After Mr. Pena began his term of supervised release, “he immediately secured employment at the Auto Tech group, which is a car dealership, for which he attends auctions.” (Id. at 3.)
While Mr. Pena describes his employment as “steady,” he argues that his ability to fully perform his job is impeded by his continued supervision, stating that he “cannot travel outside this judicial district, such as Brooklyn, to attend auctions.” (Id. at 5.)
The Probation Office supports his request for early termination of his supervised release, confirming that his full-time employment with Auto Tech has been verified and providing the Court with further detail regarding his reentry.
Mr. Pena has complied with the conditions of his supervised release and has demonstrated “exceptionally good behavior” for the last two and a half years, as well as during his long period of incarceration.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>