Order On November 30, 2022, Mildred Crowley pled guilty to a charge of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

The government alleged that Ms. Crowley devised and participated in a scheme to defraud her former employer by stealing from it more than $2.3 million of its funds for personal uses over a period of over ten years.

On July 12, 2023, I sentenced Ms. Crowley to 37 months’ imprisonment—a downward departure from the then-applicable Guidelines range of 41-51 months.

Additionally, I considered the health conditions Ms. Crawley raises in her compassionate release motion.

Given the extent of her fraud, I conclude that shaving off over half of her sentence at this point would not be consistent with the § 3553(a) factors.

11/11) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. ✔ § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: DENIED.

GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in ✔ months is reduced to the last judgment issued) of .

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted) Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated

Order Date: 11/04/2024 Judge’s signature Effective Date: (if different from order date) Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Court Judge Printed name and title Case No: USM No: )))))) 07/19/2023 01/12/2024 33504-509

Defendants nonetheless contested the traceability of the $8.4 million and filed a motion to preclude the government from shifting its position on the traceability of those funds and exclude related evidence.

Olinghouse did not testify that this was his model for the language at issue in this litigation, but the Court makes the observation nonetheless.

As to Johnston, Hankey, and Appleby-Bhattacharjee, none of them knew that any part of the assets listed in the forfeiture allegations or the protective order had been acquired using nontraceable funds or that any nontraceable property ...

Because the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, and none of Defendants’ arguments for a new trial are meritorious, the motions are denied.

Yet, none of the under- deliveries were disclosed to the pharma-clients.

Nonetheless, Defendants contend that the convictions on these counts cannot stand.

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1 Eastern Division

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, January 12, 2024: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: as to Rishi Shah, Shradha Agarwal, Brad Purdy.

Sentencings set for 2/5/2024, 2/7/2024, and 2/82024 are vacated and will be reset at a later date.

If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.