board members, attorneys, agents, representatives, employees, and affiliates, from proceeding with non—judicial foreclosure against Plaintiff during the pendency of the above—numbered lawsuit.

Plaintiff and Defendant understand the terms of this Agreed Order Granting Temporary Injunction and have - had the opportunity to engage and confer with legal counsel.

The terms of sufficiently detailed and specific to be Y Injunction are enforceable by the Court in conformance with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 683. xii.

Defendant has ' received \adequate notice of Plaintiff’s and Application for adequate Injunction, Temporary opportunity for a hearing thereon has been given to the Parties.

MONTFCRT HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., including — but not limited its agents, representatives, board members, attorneys, employees, and to — is restrained from proceeding With non—judicial foreclosure against affiliates, Plaintiff during the pendency of the above—numbered lawsuit.

Now, therefore, you, the said LIFESCAPE VILLAS ON MONTFORT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC your Counselors, Solicitors, Attorneys, Agents, Servants and employees are hereby commanded to DESIST and REFRAIN from §_E_E

Plairlitifl' .Montfort’s Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions recorded in Collin County, Texas (“CCRs”) and the Rules of Regulations of Lifescape Villas on Montfort Homeowners’ AssociationJlnc.

Defindant has threatened to pursue a non-judicial foreclosure proceeding against Plaintifi’s Condo on October 1, 2024 commencing at 10:00am based upon an assessment debt.

Granting Temporary Restraining Order relief is necessary and sufficient to preserve the status quo, because Defendant will continue to maintain its lien while this lawsuit is being adjudicated.

agents, representatives, and affiliates attorneys, immediately restrained from emfloyees, proceeding withl non—judicial foreclosure against Plaintiff, Plaintiff will suffer imminent, irrepélilrabIe harm because Plaintiff’s residence will be sold and she will be evicted Lom her residence Where there is a viable title dispute, and there is no adequate remedy at law to grant Plaintiff’s complete, final, and equal relief, as this matter is in reference to .a piece of property and this property is unique, and a substantial amount of money has been expended in order for her to acquire and keep this residence.

On Monday September 23, 2024, the Application for Temporary Restraining Order of Plaintiff KARINE GRIGORYEVA (“Plaintiff”) was heard before this Court.

Plainth and Defendant are bound by, inter alia, Lifescape Villas at Montfort’s Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions recorded in Collin County, Texas (“CCRs”) and the Rules of Regulations of Lifescape Villas on Montfort Homeowners’ Association, Inc. (“R&Rs”).

Defendant has threatened to pursue a non-judicial proceeding against Plaintiff’s Condo on October 1, 2024 commencing at 10:00am based upon an assessment debt.

assessment debt is for unauthorized charges stemming from common areas for Which Defendant — not Plaintiff — is responsible pursuant to the CCRs and R&Rs.

Granting Temporary Restraining Order relief is necessary and sufficient to preserve the status quo, because Defendant Will continue to maintain its lien While this lawsuit is being adjudicated.

Onthis day came to be considered Defendants’AgreedMotionfor Substitution ofCounsel, whichbeing in orderis hereby granted.

To: ALL ATTORNEYS/PARTIES Please see the attached order signed and entered in your case.

The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the personslisted below.

The rules governing certificates of service have not changed.

Filers muststill provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Envelope ID: 89176056 Filing Code Description: E-SERVED COPY OF ORDER Filing Description: E-SSERVE COVER LETTER Status as of 6/27/2024 11:41 AM CST Associated Case Party: IFC SECURED NOTES, LLC

(including conference on exhibits to be pre-admitted and exchange of demonstrative aids and affidavits), 2) Designation of deposition testimony to be offered in direct examination.

Responses to such Amended Pleadings, including any and all affirmative defenses and/or special exceptions maybefiled within two (2) weeks after this deadline.

Any expert not properly Agreed Discovery Control Plan and Scheduling Order (Level 3 — Civil) Page 2

Approved as to Form and Content: Hershel R. Chapin, Attorney for PlaintiffIFC Secured Notes, LLC

Stephen Walk Attorney for Defendant Larry Rochelle, individually and d/b/a LRRM Construction Services, LLC

The Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED based on: the Parties' announcement of no opposition at or prior to docket call.

propriate under the IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Trustee's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Trustee shall disburse any funds on hand as provided by 11 and file a Trustee's Final Report; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all debts due and owing creditors as of this date are NOT DISCI- _ U.S. C. 1326 (a) (2)

SUN-66004 0539-4 pdf022 24-40275 Christopher Marvin Lee 8701 Bedford Euless Road Suite 510 Hurst, TX 76053 004493 4493 lAB 0.544 75202 2 6 10168-1-4493 lllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 191stD$flthoun 600 Commerce St. #691 Dallas, TX 75202-4606 Electronic Bankruptcy Noticing Go- Green!

Receive notices 24 X 7 and days faster than through, US Mail.

(including conference on exhibits to be pre—admitted and exchange of demonstrative aids and affidavits), 2) Designation of deposition testimony to be offered in direct examination.

The Court will not conduct a Pre-Trial conference on matters the parties have not discussed and made a meaningful attempt to resolve.

Responses to such Amended Pleadings, including any and all affirmative defenses and/or special exceptions may be filed within two (2) weeks after this deadline.

Any objection or motion to exclude or limit expert testimony must be filed, set for hearing, and heard by such date or it is waived.

Chapin, g1 Attorney for Plaintiff IFC Secured Notes, LLC _ Judge Emily G. Tobolowsky Stephen Walker Attorney for Defendant Larry Rochelle, individually and d/b/a LRRM Construction Services, LLC Agreed Discovery Control Plan and Scheduling Order (Level 3 — Civil) Page 3

This case came on for consideration on the Motion for Default Judgment brought by CHRIS’ PAVING,LLC (“Plaintiff’}.

Venue of this case is proper in Dallas County, Texas pursuant to Tex.

the of aggregate the on interest f. Post-judgment aforementioned amounts at the rate of 8.5% per annum beginning with the date of the signing of this Judgment until date of payment; and IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that Plaintiff CHRIS’ PAVING, LLC shall have and recover a Judgment against C&A CONSTRUCTION GROUP,LLCasfollows:

IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREEDthat this Judgmentfinally disposes of all claims and parties in interest and is appealable.

Plaintiff shall be entitled to all writs of execution and other process for orders necessary to enforce this Judgment.

To: ALL ATTORNEYS/PARTIES Please see the attached order signed and entered in your case.

Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.

The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the personslisted below.

The rules governing certificates of service have not changed.

Filers muststill provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Reset or continuanceof the Trial Setting will not alter any deadline established by this Order or established by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, unless specifically provided by Rule 11 of the parties or Court order after motion showing good cause.

(including conference on exhibits to be pre-admitted and exchange of demonstrative aids and affidavits), 2) Designation of deposition testimony to be offered in direct examination.

The Court will not conduct a Pre-Trial conference on matters the parties have not discussed and made a meaningful attemptto resolve.

Responses to such Amended Pleadings, including any and all affirmative defenses and/or special exceptions may be filed within two (2) weeksafter this deadline.

Any motion to compel responses to written discovery requests and/orall objections or complaints about initial disclosures must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the close of fact discovery or such complaint is waived, except for the sanction of exclusion under Rule 193.6.

Reset or continuanceof the Trial Setting will not alter any deadline established by this Order or established by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, unless specifically provided by Rule 11 of the parties or Court order after motion showing good cause.

(including conference on exhibits to be pre-admitted and exchange of demonstrative aids and affidavits), 2) Designation of deposition testimony to be offered in direct examination.

The Court will not conduct a Pre-Trial conference on matters the parties have not discussed and made a meaningful attemptto resolve.

Responses to such Amended Pleadings, including any and all affirmative defenses and/or special exceptions may be filed within two (2) weeksafter this deadline.

Any motion to compel responses to written discovery requests and/orall objections or complaints about initial disclosures must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the close of fact discovery or such complaint is waived, except for the sanction of exclusion under Rule 193.6.