Do not use or possess any identification, mail matter, access device (including, but not limited to, credit and debit cards), or any identification-related material other than in your own legal or true name without prior permission from Supervising Agency.

Do not associate or have verbal, written, telephonic, electronic, or any other communication with any person under the age of 18 except in the presence of the parent or legal guardian of the minor after you have notified the parent or legal guardian of the pending charges or convictions involving a sex offense and only as authorized by Supervising Agency Do not enter or loiter within 100 feet of schoolyards, parks, public swimming pools, playgrounds, youth centers, video arcade facilities, amusement and theme parks, or other places frequented by persons under the age of 18 and only as authorized to do so by Supervising Agency.

In order to determine compliance, you agree to submit to a search of your person and property, including computer hardware and software, by Supervising Agency, which may be in conjunction with law enforcement..

If said forfeiture is not set aside, judgment may be summarily entered in this Court against me and each surety, jointly and severally, for the bond amount, together with interest and costs.

Execution of the judgment may be issued or payment secured as provided by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and other laws of the United States, and any cash or real or personal property or the collateral previously posted in connection with this bond may be forfeited.

Respondent.

Pursuant to the Order Summarily Dismissing Petition Without Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Date:

United States District Judge June 28, 2023

In 2016, and again in 2019, the Eleventh Circuit denied Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence.

In December 2022, Petitioner filed the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Ninth Circuit has entertained § 2241 petitions challenging, for example, the BOP’s discretionary denial of a designation that would have shortened a prisoner’s federal sentence, see Rodriguez v. Copenhaver, 823 F.3d 1238, 1242 (9th Cir. 2016), and the BOP’s ranking system for placing eligible inmates on the BOP’s Residential Drug Abuse Program wait list, see Close v. Thomas, 653, 970, 974 (9th Cir. 2011).

To make a claim of actual innocence, Petitioner must demonstrate that, “in light of all the evidence, it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have convicted him.” Muth v. Fondren, 676 F.3d 815, 819 (9th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted).

Petitioner thus had an unobstructed procedural shot to bring his sentencing claim on direct appeal and in his § 2255 motions.

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1 Eastern Division

Unopposed Motion for Entry of Preliminary Order of Forfeiture [466] is granted.

No appearance by Shradha Agarwal is needed at the 6/16/2023 Forfeiture Hearing.

If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

The following property is to be applied toward satisfaction of the personal money judgment: a. All right, title, and interest in Investment Fund A, held in the name of Jumpstart Ventures II, LLC, including, but not limited to, approximately $60,000.00 in capital contributions submitted on or around May 31, 2018; b.

Funds in the amount of $194,616.25 seized on July 8, 2021, and all remaining right, title, and interest in Investment Company C, held in the name of Jumpstart Ventures II, LLC, including, but not limited to, $50,000 in capital contributions submitted on or about January 5, 2017; y.

All right, title, and interest in Investment Fund O, held in the name of Jumpstart Ventures II, LLC, including, but not limited to, $158,879.00 in capital contributions submitted between August 8, 2016, and April 28, 2017; bb.

Specifically, the following accounts shall be liquidated and distributed as follows: a. All right, title, and interest in Investment Fund A, held in the name of Jumpstart Ventures II, LLC, including, but not limited to, approximately $60,000.00 in capital contributions submitted on or around May 31, 2018; b.

Funds in the amount of $194,616.25 seized on July 8, 2021, and all remaining right, title, and interest in Investment Company C, held in the name of Jumpstart Ventures II, LLC, including, but not limited to, $50,000 in capital contributions submitted on or about January 5, 2017; y.

At the hearing, Defendant rejected some of the information proffered by the government and relied upon in the Pretrial Services Report and Recommendation.

At the hearing, the government proffered the Indictment, the initial and updated Pretrial Services Reports and Recommendation of detention, the search warrant (and supporting affidavit) signed by a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court (“LASC”) on September 16, 2021, for the Plaza Hotel, 1721 Cabrillo Ave., Torrance, CA 90501, Unit 212 and the Manager’s Office, and a 22-page printout of certified copies of the electronic docket on file at the LASC for criminal cases against Defendant.

The Court has considered the following: (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (2) the weight of the evidence against the defendant; (3) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community.

The Court also considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing, the arguments of counsel, and the Reports and Recommendation of Pretrial Services Agency.

These conclusions are based on the following: Defendant has felony convictions in 2003 for assault with a firearm on a person, in 2011 for possession of a controlled substance, in 2015 for use of another’s credit, in 2018 for transportation of a controlled substance, and in 2021 for assault upon another person by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury.

ERIC PASSMAN and ISHMAEL ALVARADO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:

Pursuant to the Parties May 11, 2023, stipulation: a. all discovery in this matter is stayed pending the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s (the “Second Circuit”) ruling on Plaintiffs’ petition pursuant Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking leave to appeal this Court’s denial of their motion for class certification (“Plaintiffs’ 23(f) Petition”).

b. the Plaintiffs and Defendant Peloton Interactive, Inc. (together, the “Parties”) will meet and confer within seven days of the Second Circuit’s resolution of Plaintiffs’ Rule 23(f) Petition to determine whether any additional merits discovery (including expert discovery) is needed.

c. the Parties will submit a proposal to the Court within fourteen days following the Second Circuit’s resolution of Plaintiffs’ Rule 23(f) Petition.