1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pacira”) and Defendant Research Development Foundation (“RDF”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, and subject to this Court’s approval, agree to an extension of time for Pacira’s oppositions to RDF’s Motion to Compel and Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 184) and RDF’s Motion to Continue or Vacate Trial Setting (ECF No. 181) (collectively, the “Motions”).

RDF filed its Motions on June 26, 2024; To fully respond to RDF’s filings, and in light of the Independence Day holiday, the Parties have agreed to a seven-day extension for Pacira’s oppositions to the Motions, from July 10, 2024 to July 17, 2024.

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Counsel for Plaintiff, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1100 Austin, TX 78701-4255 Attorneys for Defendant, Research Development Foundation

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED based on the Parties’ foregoing Stipulation, that Pacira shall file its opposition to RDF’s motion to compel and reopen discovery and its opposition to RDF’s motion to continue or vacate trial setting on or before July 17, 2024.

After consideration of the moving papers, for good cause appearing, and no objections having been received, the following cases set forth below shall be coordinated with Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 5031: Carmen Manuel Murillo and Elizabeth Cobos, h/ w v. Syngenta AG, et al. (Case No. C24-00344), was filed on February 8, 2024 in Contra Costa Superior Court.

Andrea Barr, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest on behalf of the Estate of Frank Rozanski, Deceased v. Syngenta AG, et al. (Case No. C24-00526), was filed on February 28, 2024 in Contra Costa Superior Court.

Sandra Br'own, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest on behalf of the Estate of John Mallory, Deceased v. Syngenta AG, et al. (Case No. C24-00527), was filed on February 28, 2024 in Contra Costa Superior Court.

Wanda Morgan-Tyler, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest on behalf of the Estate of Charles Tyler, Deceased v. Syngenta AG, et al. (Case No. C24-OO528), was filed on February 28, 2024 in Contra Costa Superior Court.

Hester Mallory, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest on behalf of the Estate ofAlma Jackson, Deceased v. Syngenta AG, et al. (Case No. C24—01 174), was filed on April 29, 2024 in Contra Costa Superior Court.

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following regarding certain pre-trial deadlines in this case based on the briefing schedule in the Seventh Circuit: Event Deadline Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief Regarding August 16, 2024 Defendants' Motion to Exclude Dr. Wells Defendants' Supplemental Response Regarding Defendants' Motion to.

Exclude Dr. Wells Plaintiffs' Supplemental Reply Regarding Defendants' Motion to Exclude Dr. Wells Hearing Regarding Defendants' Motion to Exclude Dr. Wells October 4, 2024 Subject to the Court's availability September 16, 2024 The Parties propose that Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief and Defendants' Supplemental Response be limited to 25 pages, and Plaintiffs' Supplemental Reply Brief be limited to 15 pages.

On the date set forth below, I caused to be served true copies of the following 6 document(s) described as

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: I electronically served the document(s) described above via File & ServeXpress, on the recipients designated on the 10 Transaction Receipt located on the File & ServeXpress website (https://secure.fileandservexpress.com) pursuant to the Court Order establishing the case website and authorizing service of documents.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Nonetheless, RDF may file a motion to amend setting forth proper points and authorities for the relief requested.