• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 759 results

McKinney v. Corsair Gaming, Inc.

Docket 4:22-cv-00312, California Northern District Court (Jan. 14, 2022)
Judge Jon S. Tigar, presiding
Contract - Product Liability
DivisionOakland
FlagsADRMOP
Cause28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Case Type195 Contract - Product Liability
Tags195 Contract, Contract, Civil, Product Liability, 195 Contract, Contract, Civil, Product Liability
Plaintiff Antonio McKinney
Plaintiff Clint Sundeen
Plaintiff Joseph Alcantara
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 26 ORDER TO STAY CASE AND CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William H. Orrick ...

Document Echeverria-Corzan v. Dolls Kill Inc., 4:24-cv-02040, No. 26 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 9, 2025)
Motion to Stay
6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff Sonni Echeverria-Corzan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Dolls Kill, Inc. (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on September 25, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from October 8, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., to December 17, 2024, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 17), and the Court issued an Order granting the Parties stipulation (Dkt. 18); WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the Parties participated in an in-person, full-day mediation of this matter before the Honorable Judge Louis Meisinger; WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement and are currently in the process of finalizing a long-form settlement agreement; WHEREAS, on December 16, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from December 17, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., to February 11, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 19); WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on February 11, 2025 (Dkt. 20); WHEREAS, on February 6, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from February 11, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., to March 11, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 21); WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on March 11, 2025 (Dkt. 22); WHEREAS, on March 5, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from March 11, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., to April 15, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 23); Joint Stipulation to Stay Case and Continue Initial Case Management Conference Case No. 3:24-cv-02040-WHO WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on April 15, 2025 (Dkt. 24); WHEREAS, the Parties are still in the process of finalizing a long-form settlement agreement and require more time to complete it; WHEREAS, in order to conserve resources while finalizing the settlement documentation, the Parties stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the stay through May 13, 2025, reset the Initial Case Management Conference for May 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., or a later date otherwise convenient for the Court, and that if the case is not dismissed before that conference, set a deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint at the conference; WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ sixth request to continue the Initial Case Management Conference, is for good cause, and no party would be prejudiced by the proposed continuance and extension; THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED and agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
The case is stayed for all purposes through and including May 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., at which time the Court will hold an Initial Case Management Conference and set deadlines in this case, including Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint , or to such later date that is convenient for the Court;
The only exception to this stay is that seven days before the Initial Case Management Conference, the Parties shall provide the Court with the status of settlement.
In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other counsel on whose behalf this filing is jointly submitted have approved of and concurred in this filing.
The initial Case Management Conference is set for June 3, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
cite Cite Document

No. 26 ORDER TO STAY CASE AND CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William H. Orrick ...

Document Echeverria-Corzan v. Dolls Kill Inc., 3:24-cv-02040, No. 26 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 9, 2025)
Motion to Stay
6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff Sonni Echeverria-Corzan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Dolls Kill, Inc. (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on September 25, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from October 8, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., to December 17, 2024, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 17), and the Court issued an Order granting the Parties stipulation (Dkt. 18); WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the Parties participated in an in-person, full-day mediation of this matter before the Honorable Judge Louis Meisinger; WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement and are currently in the process of finalizing a long-form settlement agreement; WHEREAS, on December 16, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from December 17, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., to February 11, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 19); WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on February 11, 2025 (Dkt. 20); WHEREAS, on February 6, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from February 11, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., to March 11, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 21); WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on March 11, 2025 (Dkt. 22); WHEREAS, on March 5, 2025, the Parties filed a stipulation requesting to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from March 11, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., to April 15, 2025, and to adjust associated deadlines (Dkt. 23); Joint Stipulation to Stay Case and Continue Initial Case Management Conference Case No. 3:24-cv-02040-WHO WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order granting the Parties’ stipulation and stayed the case for all purposes through the rescheduled Initial Case Management Conference to take place on April 15, 2025 (Dkt. 24); WHEREAS, the Parties are still in the process of finalizing a long-form settlement agreement and require more time to complete it; WHEREAS, in order to conserve resources while finalizing the settlement documentation, the Parties stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court extend the stay through May 13, 2025, reset the Initial Case Management Conference for May 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., or a later date otherwise convenient for the Court, and that if the case is not dismissed before that conference, set a deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint at the conference; WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ sixth request to continue the Initial Case Management Conference, is for good cause, and no party would be prejudiced by the proposed continuance and extension; THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED and agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
The case is stayed for all purposes through and including May 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., at which time the Court will hold an Initial Case Management Conference and set deadlines in this case, including Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint , or to such later date that is convenient for the Court;
The only exception to this stay is that seven days before the Initial Case Management Conference, the Parties shall provide the Court with the status of settlement.
In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other counsel on whose behalf this filing is jointly submitted have approved of and concurred in this filing.
The initial Case Management Conference is set for June 3, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
cite Cite Document

No. 102 ORDER granting as modified 101 Stipulation to Extend Daubert Briefing Schedule signed by Judge ...

Document Vizcarra v. Michaels Stores, Inc., 5:23-cv-00468, No. 102 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 2, 2025)
Case No. 5:23-cv-00468-NW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Daubert Briefing Schedule Hon.
Noël Wise Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Nea Vizcarra (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Michaels Stores, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed her motion for class certification (Dkt. 83) and Defendant has filed its opposition to that motion (Dkt. 96); WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification is June 11, 2025 (Dkt. 92).
WHEREAS, to accommodate party scheduling conflicts, coordinate the briefing, and given the June 11 hearing date, the parties stipulate and request that the Court extend the Daubert briefing deadlines as set forth below.
Plaintiff’s oppositions to the Silverman and Weir Daubert motions are due April 30,
The hearing date for both Daubert motions remains unchanged and is set for June 11, 2025 at 9:00 am.
cite Cite Document

No. 94 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES

Document Vizcarra v. Michaels Stores, Inc., 5:23-cv-00468, No. 94 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 20, 2025)
To All Parties and Counsel of Record: The Court has reviewed the docket in this matter and ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and then advise the Court whether they will consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment.
The Court has recently received more than 150 new or transferred cases, dozens of which have motions pending.
While the Court will move all these cases forward as expeditiously as possible, this district has excellent magistrate judges, each of whom has handled highly complex matters and is more than qualified to preside over your dispute.
To the extent the parties can agree on a magistrate judge for all purposes, a consent form is available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.
Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to jointly advise the Court, no later than Friday, April 4, 2025, whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further Northern District of California United States District Court proceedings in the instant action, and if so, whether they request a particular judge or a random selection.
cite Cite Document

No. 109

Document Crowder v. The Shade Store, LLC, 5:23-cv-02331, No. 109 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 10, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 91

Document Vizcarra v. Michaels Stores, Inc., 5:23-cv-00468, No. 91 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 7, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 92

Document Vizcarra v. Michaels Stores, Inc., 5:23-cv-00468, No. 92 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 7, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 24

Document Echeverria-Corzan v. Dolls Kill Inc., 4:24-cv-02040, No. 24 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 5, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 24

Document Echeverria-Corzan v. Dolls Kill Inc., 3:24-cv-02040, No. 24 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 5, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 107

Document Crowder v. The Shade Store, LLC, 5:23-cv-02331, No. 107 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 3, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 27

Document Hong v. RugsUSA, LLC, 3:24-cv-08799, No. 27 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 27, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 23

Document Hong v. RugsUSA, LLC, 3:24-cv-08799, No. 23 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 20, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 21

Document Hong v. RugsUSA, LLC, 3:24-cv-08799, No. 21 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 14, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 22

Document Echeverria-Corzan v. Dolls Kill Inc., 3:24-cv-02040, No. 22 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 6, 2025)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>