• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 84-98 of 1,227 results

FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, JAY S. BYBEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) AFFIRMED

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000 (9th Cir. Sep. 21, 2022)
Defendants argue that the government sought a mistrial in order to regroup and reorganize its case in light of (1) Defendants’ compelling arguments regarding specific intent and the First Amendment, (2) the trial judge’s pretrial ruling that escort services are legal, and (3) the government’s poor showing at trial up to that point.
Defendants’ arguments regarding specific intent and the First Amendment were of no surprise to the government; Defendants briefed these issues extensively throughout the motion-to-dismiss stage.
In response to these arguments, the trial judge had held that the indictment alleged facts that, “taken as true, establish [D]efendants had the specific intent to promote prostitution in violation of the Travel Act.” United States v. Lacey, 423 F. Supp.
Defendants have failed to show that their arguments in support of jury instructions on these issues were so convincing as to require the government to rethink its case.
The motion judge did not abuse her discretion by refusing to make counsel for the government explain as much in an evidentiary hearing.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 51 Filed Audio recording of oral argument

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 51 (9th Cir. Sep. 2, 2022)
Case: 22-10000, 09/02/2022, ID: 12532925, DktEntry: 51, Page 1 of 1
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1580 ORDER granting the 1579 Motion for Extension of Time as to James Larkin (2)

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1580 (D.Ariz. May. 2, 2023)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
United States of America,
For good cause showing, IT IS ORDERED Defendants James Larkin, Michael Lacey, Scott Spear, Jed Brunst, Andrew Padilla, and Joye Vaught’s Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Reply (Doc. 1579) is granted.
Defendants shall file their Reply to the pending Motion to Dismiss on or before May 12, 2023.
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 542 ORDER granting 541 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs

Document Benson v. Double Down Interactive, LLC et al, 2:18-cv-00525, No. 542 (W.D.Wash. May. 1, 2023)
Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Agreement may be up to 12,000 words.
Dated this 1sth day of May, 2023.
Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Over-Length Brief
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1575

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1575 (D.Ariz. Apr. 18, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 538

Document Benson v. Double Down Interactive, LLC et al, 2:18-cv-00525, No. 538 (W.D.Wash. Mar. 14, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1527

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1527 (D.Ariz. Mar. 9, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 47

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 47 (9th Cir. Jun. 22, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 46

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 46 (9th Cir. Jun. 22, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1524

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1524 (D.Ariz. Feb. 17, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 531

Document Benson v. Double Down Interactive, LLC et al, 2:18-cv-00525, No. 531 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 9, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 43

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 43 (9th Cir. May. 19, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 529

Document Benson v. Double Down Interactive, LLC et al, 2:18-cv-00525, No. 529 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 23, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 41

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 41 (9th Cir. May. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 42

Document USA v. Michael Lacey, et al, 22-10000, No. 42 (9th Cir. May. 18, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >>