Undeterred, and admittedly without any knowledge regarding Korean law or any evidence of wrongdoing, that same day, Plaintiffs’ counsel proclaimed that “none of this is plausible,” proceeding to attribute various representations to DDI ...

Nonetheless, to buttress their transparent goal of enhancing settlement leverage, Plaintiffs have offered serious allegations of misconduct against DDI and its attorneys but have done so based on, at best, coincidence and, at worst, ...

Cannot Issue Under RCW 7.40.020, Which Applies Only to a “Defendant.” Ignoring governing Korean law, Plaintiffs nonetheless argue that they are entitled to a TRO pursuant to RCW 7.40.020.

I am the Senior Vice President and General Manager at Double Down Interactive, A88 &g9\aOYR 9\c[h’* > ZNXR ‘UV_ QRPYN^N‘V\[ ON_RQ \[ ]R^_\[NY X[\cYRQTR N[Q P\aYQ ‘R_‘VSe competently as to the facts set forth below.

DoubleUDiamond is a wholly owned subsidiary of Double Down Interactive Co., A‘Q* &g9DI Co., Ltd.h’( N @\^RN[ P\^]\^N‘V\[ cV‘U V‘_ ]^V[PV]NY ]YNPR \S Oa_V[R__ V[ GR\aY( @\^RN* DoubleU Games Co., Ltd., a Korean Corporation with its principal place of business in Seoul, Korea, owns 67.7% of DDI Co., Ltd. SIGRIST DECL. ISO 9DI7A: 9DKCiG DEEiC TO EAH;Gi BDH* ;DF HFD (2:18-cv-00525-RSL) f 1 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0:4<3769"19=58:;5"20-"/,’’%’$&#’($0#(.+(#.0’1#.%*),.+.1)+$ In addition to being the General Manager of Double Down, I am the Chief

The DDI Co. Ltd. shareholder vote scheduled for August 26, 2022 concerns the election of directors and approval of a reduction in the compa[ei_ gPN]V‘NY ^R_R^bRh balance by approximately $50 million USD.

As a direct result of the proposed reduction in capital reserve, no monies will be immediately spent by or withdrawn from DDI Co. Ltd.

The reduction in gPN]V‘NY ^R_R^bRh does allow DDI Co., Ltd. in the future to use the approximately $50 million to pay dividends or repurchase shares.

SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs,

DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC, a DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, and Washington limited liability company, and INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, a INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, a Nevada Corporation, Nevada Corporation,

The Clerk of the Court The Clerk of the Court All Counsel of Record All Counsel of Record PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jordan Harris of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP hereby PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jordan Harris of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP hereby withdraws as counsel of record for Defendant DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC, in this withdraws as counsel of record for Defendant DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC, in this action effective immediately.

Jaime Drozd Allen, Stuart R. Dunwoody, and Benjamin J. Robbins, action effective immediately.

Jaime Drozd Allen, Stuart R. Dunwoody, and Benjamin J. Robbins, Lindsey E. Mundt, Sean M. Sullivan and Sarah Burns of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP will Lindsey E. Mundt, Sean M. Sullivan and Sarah Burns of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP will continue as counsel for DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC in this action.

Defendant Double Down Interactive, LLC (“Double Down”) gives notice to the Court and parties pursuant to LCR 65(b)(5) that it intends to oppose the relief sought in Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Dkt. 482].

In the ordinary course of motion practice, our strong preference is to agree to reasonable, stipulated briefing schedules.

Our view, as you know (and have not offered any reason for us to depart from), is that in fifteen days your client intends to abscond with money that belongs to the Class.

Especially given that you have now twice argued that the Court is powerless to grant the remedy we seek, we believe it's imperative to have a live hearing on the issue as quickly as possible.

If the Court grants temporary relief, we're certainly happy to set a stipulated briefing schedule on the subsequent preliminary injunction motion practice.

350 N LaSalle Street, 14th Floor, Chicago, IL 60654 Tel: 312 589 6370 • Fax: 312 589 6378 The Class seeks—and Defendants do not oppose—an additional two-week extension of all settlement deadlines.1 Over the past two months, Class Counsel has worked diligently to administer this Settlement, including by issuing subpoenas to four Platform Providers and negotiating with each regarding the production of data necessary to effectuate the Notice Plan.

Class Counsel successfully obtained relevant data from Apple, Google, and Meta at the end of December 2022 and in the first week of January 2023.

The Settlement Administrator requires additional time to aggregate the data received from the four Platforms, create the Class List, and administer the Notice Program.

Consequently, the Class respectfully requests that the Court continue all remaining deadlines by an additional 14 days, as set forth in the attached Proposed Order.

1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: 206.682.5600 Class Counsel and Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Admitted pro hac vice