• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-53 of 31,516 results

No. 275 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Document Weems Industries, Inc. v. Teknor Apex Company, 1:20-cv-00108, No. 275 (N.D.Iowa Nov. 20, 2024)
None of the above- referenced, January to February 2014 emails refer to or suggest the occurrence of any kind of oil testing.
Nonetheless, Weems’ distributors and retailers continued to tout the functionality of Flexzilla’s chartreuse color with the marketing information Weems had previously instructed them to use.
Nonetheless, on January 17, 2019, Teknor provided Weems with a sample of a NexFlex hose that was already in production and being shipped to customers.
Even if the sales figures shown in Exhibit W007 are accurate, they reflect that Weems’ sales of the Flexzilla hose have increased over time but nonetheless represent a small (less than five percent) share of the total market for water ...
None of this is consistent with Cunningham’s testimony that she was testing for post-sale confusion, rather than point-of-sale confusion.
Even though Weems’ then-current advertising promoted the “safety feature” of Flexzilla as having a high visibility color that makes the hose more visible – none of these materials were submitted in response to the Examining Attorney’s ...
Nonetheless, I will proceed to address the issue of distinctiveness.
None of the exhibits promote the color of Flexzilla as a source identifier.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 100 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 78 Motion to Lift Stay; MOOTING 79 Motion for Leave to File ...

Document Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., 1:22-cv-00488, No. 100 (W.D.Tex. Oct. 31, 2024)
On October 15, 2021, Plaintiff Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC (“Charge Fusion”) filed a complaint against Defendant Tesla, Inc., (“Tesla”) alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 9,853,488 (the “’488 Patent”), 10,819,135 (the “’135 Patent”), and 10,998,753 (the “’753 Patent”) (collectively “Asserted Patents”).
On June 27, 2024, Defendant filed a timely Notice of Appeal of this PTAB Final Written Decision concerning the ’135 Patent to the Federal Circuit.
Defendant counters that it is currently seeking Federal Circuit review regarding the interpretation of claim terms underpinning the PTAB’s analyses in its Final Written Decisions upholding their validity.
Indeed, the Federal Circuit has long held that “[r]ecognition must be given to the strong public policy favoring expeditious resolution of litigation.” Kahn v. GMC, 889 F.2d 1078, 1080 (Fed. Cir. 1989); see also United States ex rel.
Defendant correctly asserts that Plaintiff has failed to identify any specific witness or other evidence that is at risk of being lost if the stay is maintained pending the appeal.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 89 ORDER Setting Hearing on 78 Opposed MOTION to Lift Stay, 79 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File ...

Document Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., 1:22-cv-00488, No. 89 (W.D.Tex. Oct. 10, 2024)
It is hereby ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for an in person hearing on the pending Opposed MOTION to Lift Stay and Opposed MOTION for Leave (Dkt no. 78 & 79) before Senior U.S. District Judge David Alan Ezra in Courtroom 2, on the Fourth Floor of the United States Courthouse, 501 West Fifth Street, Austin, TX, on Thursday, October 31, 2024 at 09:00 AM.
DATED: Austin, Texas October 10, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Regalo International, LLC v. Summer Infant, Inc.

Docket 1:17-cv-01074, Delaware District Court (Aug. 2, 2017)
Judge Maryellen Noreika, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, MEDIATION-MPT, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Regalo International, LLC
Defendant Summer Infant, Inc.
Counter Claimant Summer Infant, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Carlson Pet Products, Inc. v. North States Industries, Inc.

Docket 0:17-cv-02529, Minnesota District Court (July 5, 2017)
Judge Nancy E. Brasel, presiding, Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez
Patent
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED, CV, PATENT, PROTO
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Carlson Pet Products, Inc.
Defendant North States Industries, Inc.
Respondent Regalo International, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

29 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2023-00063, No. 29 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. May. 2, 2024)
Contrary to the position taken in its briefing, at oral hearing, counsel for Patent Owner agreed that the claim does not require that operation of the climate control mechanism ceases.
Based on the record before us, this understanding of the claim does not render the “until” limitation meaningless and is sufficient to reach our decision, while also being consistent with the ordinary and customary meaning and the Specification.
Petitioner notes Hibi’s explanation “that these abnormality responses are designed, in part, for situations ‘when the driver leaves a child 61 or a pet animal 62 within the vehicle and is away from the automobile.’” Id. (citing Ex. 1008 ¶ 47).
Accordingly, because limitation 1[h] requires instructions that operate the climate control mechanism based in some manner on the predetermined battery level, Petitioner’s challenge to claim 1 is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence before us.
Contrary to Petitioner’s representations, the charge level in Hibi that results in starting the engine does not necessarily correspond to an amount of time that the system can maintain the stored temperature in the manner
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 76 STATUS REPORT ORDER Status Report due by 5/29/2024

Document Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., 1:22-cv-00488, No. 76 (W.D.Tex. Apr. 29, 2024)
The Court stayed this case on February 23, 2023.
The parties filed a status report on May 18, 2023, (Dkt. 75), but have filed no status reports since that time.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties file an updated status report on or before May 29, 2024 and every three months thereafter.
SIGNED on April 29, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

35 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision Determining Challenged Cl...

Document IPR2023-00062, No. 35 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision Determining Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a (P.T.A.B. Apr. 16, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1609

Document Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. et al, 3:11-cv-01810, No. 1609 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1607

Document Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. et al, 3:11-cv-01810, No. 1607 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

28 Other Hearing transcript: Other Hearing transcript

Document IPR2023-00063, No. 28 Other Hearing transcript - Other Hearing transcript (P.T.A.B. Mar. 1, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

33 Other Hearing transcript: Other Hearing transcript

Document IPR2023-00062, No. 33 Other Hearing transcript - Other Hearing transcript (P.T.A.B. Mar. 1, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1605

Document Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. et al, 3:11-cv-01810, No. 1605 (S.D.Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

29 Notice Other: LEAP Practitioner Request and Verification Form Petitioner

Document IPR2023-00062, No. 29 Notice Other - LEAP Practitioner Request and Verification Form Petitioner (P.T.A.B. Feb. 5, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

26 Order Other: Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR sec 4270

Document IPR2023-00063, No. 26 Order Other - Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR sec 4270 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 17, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>