• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 454 results

Proposed Order or Document Index # 8

Document Northern Municipal Power Agency vs City of Warren, Minnesota, Daniel Juhl, Warren Community Hybrid, LLC, 57-CV-22-784, 28112022_Proposed Order or Document_0 (Minnesota State, Penn...
Id. However, none of the concerns that Schneider and McLennan expressed about the hybrid project seemed to make any difference to Mortenson or Juhl. Id. On April 20, 2022, Schneider attended a regularly scheduled meeting of ...
cite Cite Document

Cave Consulting Group, Inc. v. OptumInsight, Inc.,

Docket 3:15-cv-03424, California Northern District Court (July 24, 2015)
Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, CONSENT, PRVADR, RELATE, STAYED
Cause15:15 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Cave Consulting Group, Inc.
Defendant OptumInsight, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

Motion to Vacate Index # 4

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 21122023_Motion to Vacate_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Dec. 21, 2023)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 60.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Systechcorp, Inc. (“Systech”) hereby moves to vacate the default judgment entered on November 14, 2023, in the Conciliation Court matter (Case No. 27-CV-CO-5027).
Meeting ID: 161 976 9066 Passcode: 069902 This Motion will be supported by a Memorandum, a Declaration of Guru Pandyar,
a proposed order, the arguments of counsel, and the entire record.
Filed in District Court State of Minnesota
Filed in District Court State of Minnesota
cite Cite Document

No. 777 ORDER granting 776 Proposed Briefing Schedule

Document B & R Supermarket, Inc., et al v. Visa, Inc. et al, 1:17-cv-02738, No. 777 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2022)
The parties provide the following proposed briefing schedule in this action:
Summary judgment, Daubert, arbitration, and/or class- related motions Oppositions to summary judgment, Daubert, arbitration, and/or class- related motions Replies in support of summary judgment, Daubert, arbitration, and/or class- related motions n/a n/a n/a 45 days after Plaintiffs’ deadline to provide Defendants a report on class exclusion requests 60 days after date for summary judgment, Daubert, arbitration, and/or class-related motions 60 days after date for oppositions to summary judgment, Daubert, arbitration, and/or class-related motions The requirement of filing pre-motion letters before submitting these motions is waived.
DATED: July 8, 2022 Brooklyn, New York s/ MKB
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document

No. 775

Document B & R Supermarket, Inc., et al v. Visa, Inc. et al, 1:17-cv-02738, No. 775 (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2022)

cite Cite Document

Judgment Index # 30

Document RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. vs Daniel Kramer, 27-CV-22-16576, 07032024_Judgment_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Mar. 7, 2024)
Filed in District Court State of Minnesota
Upon the stipulation of the parties, parties agree to dismissal with prejudice of all allegations and claims in the Complaint and in the Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
Lois R. Conroy Judge of District Court
cite Cite Document

Notice of Entry of Judgment Index # 31

Document RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. vs Daniel Kramer, 27-CV-22-16576, 07032024_Notice of Entry of Judgment_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Mar. 7, 2024)
State of Minnesota Hennepin County
Notice of Entry of Dismissal
RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. vs Daniel Kramer You are notified that on 3/7/2024 a Judgment of Dismissal was entered in this case.
Attorneys: Only the first listed attorney for a party is being sent this notice.
If you are the attorney receiving this notice, inform all other attorneys representing your party of this judgment.
cite Cite Document

Stipulation Index # 20

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 29022024_Stipulation_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Feb. 29, 2024)
Filed in District Court State of Minnesota
Case Type: CONCILIATION COURT APPEAL Court File No. 27-CV-23-18664 (Judge Joseph R. Klein)
Pursuant to Rule 41.01(a) of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned counsel and parties agree to dismissal with prejudice of this action, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
Dated: February 29, 2024
cite Cite Document

Stipulation Index # 17

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 28022024_Stipulation_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Feb. 28, 2024)
Plaintiff Visual Consultants, Inc., and Defendant Systechcorp Inc. (collectively “the Parties”) have settled their dispute.
Pursuant to the settlement, the parties have agreed to a two-step process whereby (1) the district court may first enter an order vacating the default Judgment for Visual Consultants in the amount of $14,398.00 (“the Judgment”) entered in the conciliation court matter captioned Visual Consultants, Inc., Plaintiff vs. Systechcorp Inc., Defendant,” Case No. 27- CO-23-5027 (“Conciliation Court Action”), and (2) after the vacatur order is entered, the parties shall file stipulations for the dismissal with prejudice of this action and the Conciliation Court Action.
This filing relates to Step 1, and asks the Court to enter an order on Defendant’s Rule 60.02 Motion that vacates the default judgment.
Filed in District Court State of Minnesota
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties and through their respective attorneys, that Defendant’s Rule 60.02 Motion may be granted and the default judgment of the Hennepin County Conciliation Court entered on November 14, 2023 in the amount of $14,398.00, be vacated and dismissed.
cite Cite Document

12022024_Stipulation_0

Document RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. vs Daniel Kramer, 27-CV-22-16576, 12022024_Stipulation_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Feb. 12, 2024)

cite Cite Document

12022024_Stipulation_1

Document RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. vs Daniel Kramer, 27-CV-22-16576, 12022024_Stipulation_1 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Feb. 12, 2024)

cite Cite Document

1303468

Document Sharrie L. Gronewold, Respondent, vs. Daniel Kramer, Appellant., A23-1868, 1303468 (Minn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2024)

cite Cite Document

16012024_Memorandum_0

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 16012024_Memorandum_0 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Jan. 16, 2024)

cite Cite Document

09012024_Affidavit-Other_2

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 09012024_Affidavit-Other_2 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Jan. 9, 2024)

cite Cite Document

09012024_Affidavit-Other_1

Document Visual Consultants, Inc. vs Systechcorp Inc., 27-CV-23-18664, 09012024_Affidavit-Other_1 (Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court Jan. 9, 2024)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>