/ Lg A/Op/L fleiflm flare/W 7L / 5217/5746 for the hearing currently scheduled on / O'/ Z0 // 2% &3 A continuance request was filed by /0///4/g

Th continuance request is: &/ )\/\M //) (".7 AV 0 germ ram; ,1 vs«/ (SO/la k 74 «mint/704g (7% m El Denie The he 'ng will remain on the calendar as scheduled and all parties are expected to.

Upon processing, the Court will send a check in the amount of the costs to the opposing party.

If costs are not paid by the above-listed due date, the hearing remains on the calendar as scheduled and all parties are expected to appear prepared for trial.

Exhibits already received by the Court will be available for the next hearing date.

None of the individual defendants resides in Ohio. None of the individual defendants is identified as ever working in Ohio or doing any business there. None of the communications or other recruitment efforts identified in the Verified ...

... brief (ECF #24, filed June 17,2023), in which general jurisdiction over Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway in Pennsylvania was upheld based on Norfolk Southern's registration to do business in Pennsylvania, despite the fact that none ...

Here, none of Supreme Lending's alleged actions in connection with any of the individual defendants had any connection with Ohio, nor do any of the activities at issue show a "purposeful availment" of the benefits of Ohio law by ...

COMPLAINT and ORDER TRIAL DATE: January 17, 2023 ACTION FILED: August 13, 2021 Plaintiff, vs.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and LCR 15, Plaintiff and Defendants by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff be given leave of the Court to amend the complaint filed herein and the FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND JURY TRIAL, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be filed within sixteen days of this stipulation being granted by the court.

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on August 13, 2021 and subsequently served the Summons and Complaint on multiple Defendants.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) allows for the amendment of pleadings with leave of the court, or with opposing counsel’s written consent, before trial.

The Ninth Circuit has instructed that this rule “should be interpreted with ‘extreme liberality,’” Jackson v. Bank of Hawaii, 902 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. Webb, 655 F.2d 977, 979 (9th Cir. 1981)), and “[a]n outright refusal to grant leave to amend without a justifying reason is ... an abuse of discretion.” Smith v. Constellation Brands, Inc., 2018 WL 991450, at *2 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 2018) (quoting Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publ’g, 512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008)).

Filed in District Court State of Minnesota

This matter came before the Court pursuant to Defendant Daniel Kramer’s motion to Additional Days to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint e-filed and submitted on November 15, 2022.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Daniel Kramer’s motion for an additional 20 days is GRANTED.

Defendant Daniel Kramer is to file the Answer to Plaintiff Ryan Companies US, Inc., complaint by December 18, 2022.

Lois R. Conroy Judge of District Court

1:] The request for continuance is granted upon payment of$ absolute costs.

Make check or money order payable to Conciliation Court and mail to 300 S. 6th Street, 3rel Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55487.

Failure to pay costs as ordered could result in further action by the Court including a judgment against you or the dismissal of your claim.

The date and time for the continued hearing will be scheduled by court administration.

All parties are expected to be fully preparedfor trial on the continued date.