Search court records - party Erin Mersino, page 4

Precedential Opinion

Document Resurrection School, et al v. Elizabeth Hertel, et al, 20-2256 (6th Cir. May. 25, 2022)

If Beshear were the law, of course, none of those facts would have mattered to the Supreme Court.

Its purported “application” of Tandon simply concluded that none of the exempted secular activities was comparable to face-to-face No. 20-2256 Resurrection Sch. et al. v. Hertel et al.

In any event, none of the panel majority’s second-order attempts to distinguish Resurrection School’s face-to-face instruction from the various secular activities MDHHS exempted can withstand analytical scrutiny.

As explained below, however, none of these proffered rationales can withstand serious scrutiny. never to recur.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- Christopher Mianecki, Individually and as Next Friend
- Resurrection School
Analyze Firm
- American Freedom Law Center
- Great Lakes Justice Center

+ More Snippets

No. 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed

Document Cervini v. Park, 24-50442, No. 1 (5th Cir. Jun. 3, 2024)

Defendant Dolores Park appeals this Court’s Order entered on May29, 2024, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

That Order denied Defendant Dolores Park’s motion to compel discovery from the United States and recognized the United States as an intervening party over Ms. Park’s opposition to its notice.

to Compel Discovery, ECF No. 406; Park’s Replyin Supp.

to Compel Discovery, ECF No. 410; Park’s Opp.

of Intervention, ECF No. 391; Reply in Supp.

Cite Document

Analyze

Jesse Ventura v. Taya Kyle

Docket 14-3876, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (Dec. 23, 2014)

Assault, Libel & Slander (Appeals)

Case Type	4320 Assault, Libel & Slander
Tags	4320 Assault, Libel and Slander, Slander, Libel and Slander, Tort, Civil, Libel, 4320 Assault, Libel and Slander, Slander, Libel and Slander, Tort, Civil, Libel
Plaintiff - Appellee	Jesse Ventura, also known as James G. Janos
Defendant - Appellant	Taya Kyle, as Executor of the Estate of Chris Kyle
Amicus on Behalf of Appellant(s)	33 Media Companies and Organizations
...

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- Jesse Ventura, Also Known as James G. Janos
Analyze Firm
- Henson & Efron

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED

Document Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania, et al., 19-431, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jul. 8, 2020)

None of this is to say that the Departments could not is- sue a valid rule expanding exemptions from the contracep- tive mandate.

7 C Religious employers, including petitioner Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home (Little Sisters), none- theless urge that the self-certification accommodation ren- ders them “complicit in providing [contraceptive] ...

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Party
- Federal Respondents
- The Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home
Find cases with Firm

Precedential Opinion

Document Resurrection School, et al v. Elizabeth Hertel, et al, 20-2256 (6th Cir. Nov. 10, 2021)

Decided and Filed: November 10, 2021 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS,

Osburn, COHL, STOKER & TOSKEY, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellees Linda Vail and Carol Siemon.

Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Cite Document

Analyze