Search court records - party Elizabeth Bierut, page 4

No. 216 ORAL ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DESIGNATION FORM FILED by Attorney Mr. Gregory Stuart Silbert ...

Document Excluded Lenders v. Serta, 23-20181, No. 216 (5th Cir. Jun. 17, 2024)

Gregory S. Silbert (Full Name) as counsel, acknowledge receiving notice that the below case has been scheduled for oralargument with the rt of Appeals (Case Number) is scheduled for oral argument at Citadel Equity Fund 9:00 am (Time) on Serta

If a case involves a cross appeal, the party who first files a notice of appeal is considered the appellant unless the parties otherwise agree or the court directs otherwise.

If separate appellants support the same argument, they are to avoid duplication of argument.

(Rebuttal Time)* (Time in Minutes) (Counsel Name) Gregory S. Silbert Matthew D. McGill #1 #2 #3 #4 #5

The court prefers no more than 5 minutes for rebuttal.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 217 ORAL ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DESIGNATION FORM FILED by Attorney Mr. Gregory Stuart Silbert ...

Document Excluded Lenders v. Serta, 23-20181, No. 217 (5th Cir. Jun. 17, 2024)

Gregory S. Silbert (Full Name) as counsel, acknowledge receiving notice that the below case has been scheduled for oralargument with the rt of Appeals (Case Number) is scheduled for oral argument at Ad-Hoc Group ofNon-PTL Lender PTL Lender

If a case involves a cross appeal, the party who first files a notice of appeal is considered the appellant unless the parties otherwise agree or the court directs otherwise.

If separate appellants support the same argument, they are to avoid duplication of argument.

(Rebuttal Time)* (Time in Minutes) (Counsel Name) Gregory S. Silbert Matthew D. McGill #1 #2 #3 #4 #5

The court prefers no more than 5 minutes for rebuttal.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 210 ORAL ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DESIGNATION FORM FILED by Attorney Mr. Matthew D. McGill for ...

Document Excluded Lenders v. Serta, 23-20181, No. 210 (5th Cir. Jun. 17, 2024)

(Case Number) Ad-Hoc Group ofNon-PTL Lender v. PTL Lender (Short Title)

Appellee □ Cross Appellant □ Cross Appellee □ Amicus □ Intervenor According to this court's rules, a cross or separate appeal will be argued with the initial appeal during the same argument, unless the court directs otherwise.

If a case involves a cross appeal, the party who first files a notice of appeal is considered the appellant unless the parties otherwise agree or the court directs otherwise.

If separate appellants support the same argument, they are to avoid duplication of argument.

The court prefers no more than 5 minutes for rebuttal.

Cite Document

Analyze