Search court records - party Edward Paltzik, page 8

Brief amici curiae of Second Amendment - Certificate of Word Count

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Brief amici curiae of Second Amendment, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Aug. 21, 2023)

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 6,070 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 21st day of August 2023. oe 8ay isre MsFy z™iz Exe % eS 4 go: 5~l4—ag i Oe war Py Ae

District of Columbia My commission expires March 14, 2028.

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief amici curiae of DC Coalition - Proof of Service

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Brief amici curiae of DC Coalition, Proof of Service (U.S. Aug. 21, 2023)

eye wisCNSPNTf t (6.

I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on August 21, 2023, three (3) copies of the BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE

ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERin the above-captioned case were served, as required by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.5(c), on the following:

¥ 7 Se Pee o4 fSr§ oy = EXP 5‘Ss 2% 5-14-28 i : Be, Ss erOF ios” Mapegpenest tt |

District of Columbia My commission expires March 14, 2028.

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Giffords Law - Proof of Service

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Brief amicus curiae of Giffords Law, Proof of Service (U.S. Aug. 21, 2023)

No. 22-915 IN THE pìéêÉãÉ=`çìêí=çÑ=íÜÉ=råáíÉÇ=pí~íÉë= UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ZACKEY RAHIMI, Petitioner, Respondent. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I a

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Crime - Main Document

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Crime, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 21, 2023)

... of the Am. Acad. of Psychiatry & the Law 376, 384-85 (Sept. 2010) https://jaapl.org/content/38/3/376 (noting prior studies finding “the rate of violation ranged from 3 to 79 percent with a mean of 40 percent” but observing that nonetheless ...

An order of protection had been issued in none of these cases, removing the deterrent that Section 922(g)(8) creates.

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of Houston Area - Main Document

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Brief amicus curiae of Houston Area, Main Document (U.S. Aug. 21, 2023)

Andrew Anglemyer, Tara Horvath, and George Rutherford, “The Accessibility of Firearms and Risk for Suicide and Homicide Victimization among Household Members: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” Annals of Internal Medicine 160 (2014) ........................................... 6, 8

Congress enacted § 922(g)(8) to prevent gun possession by intimate partners subject to protective orders, responding to empirical proof of the extreme and intolerable risk firearms pose in the hands of abusers.

Section 922(g)(8) only applies to an order that is issued by a court, after a hearing in which the respondent receives actual notice and an opportunity to participate, and it includes findings and prohibitions to protect intimate partners and children.

Assuring domestic tranquility and the general welfare is a right to protect the State, which, as this Court has recognized in Heller, McDonald v. City of Chicago, and Bruen, incorporates significant public safety exceptions.

“Through the founding era, governments did not recognize, much less intervene directly in, intimate- partner violence because of Anglo-American common law’s treatment of domestic relations: a husband had a legal right to subject his wife to physical violence— what was called ‘chastisement’—if she defied his authority.” Amicus Br.

Cite Document

Analyze