• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 4,798 results

Petition DENIED Statement of Justice -

Document Christopher L. Wilson, Petitioner v. Hawaii, 23-7517, Petition DENIED Statement of Justice, (U.S. Dec. 9, 2024)
That conclusion contravenes the settled prin- ciple that Americans need not engage in empty formalities before they can invoke their constitutional rights, and it wrongly reduces the Second Amendment to a “second-class right.” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 780 (2010) (plurality opinion).
On the Ha- waii Supreme Court’s view, a sounder approach to constitu- tional interpretation would give due regard to the “spirit of Aloha” and would preclude any individual right to bear arms, or at least subject it to “levels of scrutiny and public
Thus, a state-law holding that a defendant “lacked stand- ing to attack the constitutionality of the ordinance because [he] made no attempt to secure a permit under it” is “not an adequate nonfederal ground of decision” where the “ordi- nance ... on its face violates the Constitution.” Staub v. City of Baxley, 355 U. S. 313, 319 (1958).
And, the court continued, those charges did not, as a matter of state law, afford Mr. Wilson standing to challenge a distinct statute, §134–9, regulating the issuance of licenses to carry guns and ammunition in public.
But under the Constitution and our precedents, it is this Cite as: 604 U. S. ____ (2024) Statement of GORSUCH, J. Court’s role to ensure that “criminal defendants [enjoy] a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.” Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U. S. 319, 324 (2006) (inter- nal quotation marks omitted).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Phyllis Coachman et al v. New York City Board of Elections

Docket 150200/2022, New York State, Richmond County, Supreme Court (Feb. 2, 2022)
Case TypeTorts - Other (15th Amendment Violation)
TagsTort, Civil, Other, Amendment Violation
Plaintiff Phyllis Coachman
Plaintiff Anthony Gilhuys
Plaintiff Katherine James
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

East Capital Investments Corp. v. GenTech Holdings, Inc.

Docket 1:21-cv-10300, New York Southern District Court (Dec. 3, 2021)
Judge Louis L. Stanton, presiding
Negotiable Instrument
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF
Cause28:1332nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Case Type140 Negotiable Instrument
Tags140 Negotiable Instrument, 140 Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff East Capital Investments Corp.
Defendant Gentech Holdings, Inc.
Defendant GenTech Holdings, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

East Capital Investments Corp. v. GenTech Holdings, Inc.

Docket 1:21-cv-10272, New York Southern District Court (Dec. 2, 2021)
Judge Laura Taylor Swain, presiding
Negotiable Instrument
DivisionFoley Square
Flags15-MISC-131, CLOSED, ECF
CauseCivil Miscellaneous Case
Case Type140 Negotiable Instrument
Tags140 Negotiable Instrument, 140 Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff East Capital Investments Corp.
Defendant GenTech Holdings, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Shineco, Inc. v. Lei Zhang et al

Docket 160669/2021, New York State, New York County, Supreme Court (Nov. 26, 2021)
Barry R. Ostrager, presiding
Case TypeCommercial Division
TagsCommercial Division, Commercial, Civil
Plaintiff - Petitioner Shineco, Inc.
Defendant - Respondent Lei Zhang
Defendant - Respondent Yan Li
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Rosati v. Long Island Railroad et al

Docket 1:21-cv-08594, New York Southern District Court (Oct. 19, 2021)
Judge Margaret M. Garnett, presiding, Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn
Civil Rights - Jobs
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF
Cause28:1441wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Case Type442 Civil Rights - Jobs
Tags442 Civil Rights, Jobs, 442 Civil Rights, Jobs
Plaintiff Steven Rosati
Defendant Long Island Railroad
Defendant Metropolitan Transit Authority
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

01-2024

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. United States, 23-939, 01-2024 (U.S. Jul. 1, 2024)
It would permit a prosecutor to do indirectly what he cannot do directly—in- vite the jury to examine acts for which a President is im- mune from prosecution to nonetheless prove his liability on any charge.
And none of them indicate whether he may be prosecuted for his official con- duct.
7 Cite as: 603 U. S. (2024) THOMAS, J., concurring None of the statutes cited by the Attorney General ap- pears to create an office for the Special Counsel, and espe- cially not with the clarity typical of past statutes used for that purpose.
3–4, the President has none.
No dangers, none at all.
17 Cite as: 603 U. S. (2024) SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting If the case nonetheless makes it to trial, the Government will bear the burden of proving every element of the alleged crime beyond a reasonable doubt to a unanimous jury of the ...
None of the same complications or consequences arise, because, as I have explained, there are no exemptions from the criminal law for any person, but every defendant can assert whatever legal arguments and defenses might be ...
This much is clear: Before today, none of these kinds of inquiries was necessary for criminal liability to be fairly as- sessed with respect to persons accused of having engaged in criminal conduct. And, frankly, none is needed now—ex- ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. United States, 23-939, Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jul. 1, 2024)
It would permit a prosecutor to do indirectly what he cannot do directly—in- vite the jury to examine acts for which a President is im- mune from prosecution to nonetheless prove his liability on any charge.
And none of them indicate whether he may be prosecuted for his official con- duct.
7 Cite as: 603 U. S. (2024) THOMAS, J., concurring None of the statutes cited by the Attorney General ap- pears to create an office for the Special Counsel, and espe- cially not with the clarity typical of past statutes used for that purpose.
3–4, the President has none.
No dangers, none at all.
17 Cite as: 603 U. S. (2024) SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting If the case nonetheless makes it to trial, the Government will bear the burden of proving every element of the alleged crime beyond a reasonable doubt to a unanimous jury of the ...
None of the same complications or consequences arise, because, as I have explained, there are no exemptions from the criminal law for any person, but every defendant can assert whatever legal arguments and defenses might be ...
This much is clear: Before today, none of these kinds of inquiries was necessary for criminal liability to be fairly as- sessed with respect to persons accused of having engaged in criminal conduct. And, frankly, none is needed now—ex- ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

21-2024

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, 21-2024 (U.S. Jun. 21, 2024)
Nonetheless, after Heller, lower courts took up the necessary work of reviewing burdens on this newly un- earthed right.
See, e.g., United States v. Daniels, 77 F. 4th 337, 358–360 (CA5 2023) (Higginson, J., concurring) (providing a similarly nonex- haustive list).
So far, Bruen’s history-focused test ticks none of those boxes.
The Government’s evidence touches on one or none of these considerations.
None establishes that the particular regulation at issue here would have been within the bounds of the pre-existing Second Amendment right.
Because there is none, I would con- clude that the statute is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED

Document United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi, 22-915, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jun. 21, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

RACHLIN v. BAUMANN et al

Docket 3:21-cv-15343, New Jersey District Court (Aug. 16, 2021)
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson, presiding, Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Civil Rights - Other
DivisionTrenton
FlagsCLOSED
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Type440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags440 Civil Rights, Other, 440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff AVI ALEXANDER RACHLIN
Defendant GEORGE K BAUMANN
Defendant FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

SANTANDER BANK, N.A., v. MERCHANDISE CONNECTION INTERNATIONAL COR...

Docket 610273/2021, New York State, Nassau County, Supreme Court (Aug. 11, 2021)

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

FRANCISCO et al v. COOKE, JR. et al

Docket 3:21-cv-14575, New Jersey District Court (Aug. 3, 2021)
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson, presiding, Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert
Civil Rights - Other

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Judgment REVERSED The mandate shall

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, Judgment REVERSED The mandate shall (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

04-2024

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, 04-2024 (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>