• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 99-113 of 5,576 results

No. 89 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/4/2025 at 09:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) ...

Document John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al, 4:24-cv-00459, No. 89 (E.D.Tex. Oct. 18, 2024)
Scheduling Order
Final Pretrial Conference at 9:00 a.m. at the Paul Brown United States Courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in Sherman, Texas.
Jury selection and trial at 10:00 a.m. at the Paul Brown United States Courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in Sherman, Texas.
If a fellow member of the Bar makes a just request for cooperation or seeks scheduling accommodation, a lawyer will not arbitrarily or unreasonably withhold consent.
Alternatively, if exhibits have been scanned and will be presented via a computer projection system, be sure there is a way for the court to view or read them separately so as to be able to understand motions and objections.
Counsel are responsible for informing their clients and witnesses about courtroom dress requirements and protocol, such as silencing pagers and phones, and not chewing gum, reading newspapers, or eating.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 80 In consideration of the full record in this case and for judicial efficiency, it is hereby ...

Document Baker et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation, et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 80 (E.D.Va. Oct. 15, 2024)
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 77).
Plaintiffs noticed the Motion for a hearing on October 18, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.
In consideration of the full record in this case and for judicial efficiency, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion is CONTINUED to October 23, 2024 at 1:00 p.m.
It is further ORDERED that the briefing schedule set forth in Paragraph 14(e) of the Rule 16(b) Order remains unchanged, such that Defendants’ response is due by October 16, 2024 at 5:00 p.m.
ET, and Plaintiffs’ reply, if any, is to be filed as soon as possible on October 17, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 80 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 75 Motion for Protective Order

Document John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al, 4:24-cv-00459, No. 80 (E.D.Tex. Oct. 4, 2024)
Until any dispute under this paragraph is ruled upon by the presiding judge, the designation will remain in full force and effect, and the information will continue to be accorded the confidential treatment required by this Protective Order.
Neither the taking of any action in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order, nor the failure to object thereto, shall be construed as a awaiver of any claim or defense in this proceeding.
Amos L. Mazzant, III **This envelope, which is being filed under seal, contains documents that are subject to a Protective Order governing the use of confidential discovery material.
However, counsel for any party is entitled to retain all court papers, deposition and trial transcripts and other sworn statements, exhibits, expert reports, and attorney work product reproducing, paraphrasing, or otherwise disclosing Confidential Information or Confidential Case 4:24-cv-00459-ALM Document 80 Filed 10/04/24 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 1927 Attorney Eyes Only Information, provided that any such materials are maintained and protected in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order.
I also agree to notify any stenographic, clerical or technical personnel who are required to assist me of the terms of this Protective Order and of its binding effect on them and me.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 79 STIPULATED ORDER RE: ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Document John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al, 4:24-cv-00459, No. 79 (E.D.Tex. Oct. 4, 2024)
Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system.
In accordance with the rules governing initial disclosures in the Eastern District of Texas, each party will search for, identify, preserve, and collect all documents “relevant to any party’s claim or defense” in this matter.
Any disputes that cannot be resolved between the parties during the meet and confer process may be presented to the Court in accordance with the Local Rules.
The parties agree that all documents existing in electronic format shall be produced as black and white Group IV single-page TIFF image files of at least 300 dpi resolution, except that files not reasonably usable when converted to TIFF image shall be produced according to Section 5(d).
The parties will meet and confer on any Case 4:24-cv-00459-ALM Document 79 Filed 10/04/24 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 1914 challenge within fourteen (14) calendar days.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 74 ORDER granting 73 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed John Jeffrey Eichmann for Tyler Baker,John ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 74 (E.D.Va. Sep. 27, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
FULL NAME (no initials, please) Bar Identification Number Firm Name Firm Phone # E-Mail Address Office Mailing Address State Direct Dial # Name(s) of federal district court(s) in which I have been admitted
I certify that the rules of the federal court in the district in which I maintain my office extend a similar pro hac vice admission privilege to members of the bar of the Eastern District of Virginia.
I am am not a full-time employee of the United States of America, and if so, request exemption from the admission fee.
I affirm that his/her personal and professional character and standing are good, and petition the court to admit the applicant pro hac vice.
et al. Tyler Baker and Laura Grodnick John Jeffrey Eichmann 227472
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 48 ORDER GRANTING 47 STIPULATION TO CHANGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

Document Smith et al v. Intel Corporation, 4:23-cv-05761, No. 48 (N.D.Cal. Sep. 19, 2024)
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Darques Smith, Renee Waltrip, Brian Cameron, Elizabeth Cordova and Michael Worley (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”), by and through their respective counsel, respectfully submit the following stipulation: WHEREAS, on September 12, 2024, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint and the current deadline for Intel to answer or otherwise respond is September 26, 2024; WHEREAS, the parties jointly wish to set out now an orderly briefing schedule that incorporates agreed-upon dates, subject to the Court’s approval;
Case No. 4:23-CV-05761-HSG WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the enlargement of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by Court Order.
hereby stipulate as follows: Intel’s deadline to move to dismiss the Amended Complaint is extended to October 17, 2024; Plaintiffs’ deadline to oppose that motion shall be November 21, 2024; and Intel’s deadline to reply in support of that motion shall be December 19, 2024.
Hon.
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Court Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 72 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 72 (E.D.Va. Sep. 18, 2024)
P. 26(a)(1) and (2), notices of depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents and admissions, and answers thereto shall not be filed on the docket except on order of the Court, or for use in a motion or at trial.
Paragraph 5 of the Joint Discovery Plan states that the parties are preparing a stipulated Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) Protocol that will govern the production of ESI.
In addition, as discussed during the initial pretrial conference, this Order does not set deadlines for class certification or summary judgment briefing.
In Paragraph 12 of the Joint Discoveiy Plan, the parties outline their positions with respect to certain issues regarding the logging of responsive privileged communications.
In the event the case is tried without a jury, counsel shall file written proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the beginning of trial.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 71 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala: Initial Pretrial ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 71 (E.D.Va. Sep. 18, 2024)
Case 1:24-cv-01265-AJT-LRV Document 71 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 397 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Lindsev R. Vaala CA- I:24-cv-1265 DATE: 09/18/2024 TIME: w it AP
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 67 ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 65) is GRANTED

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 67 (E.D.Va. Sep. 16, 2024)
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Tyler Baker and Lora Grodnick’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Case Caption (Dkt. No.
Upon due consideration and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 65) is GRANTED.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to substitute Discover Financial Services for Discover Financial Services, Inc., as a defendant in this ca.se.
'fhe Clerk is aLso DIRECTE^D to correct the docket and the ease name to reflect Capital One Financial Corporation as the first named defendant.
ENTERED this 16th day of September, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 68 ORDER denying as moot 67 Motion to Reschedule Rule 16 Management Conference

Document John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al, 4:24-cv-00459, No. 68 (E.D.Tex. Sep. 16, 2024)
Before the Court is Defendant Charles Schwab & Co’s Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Rule 16 Management Conference (Dkt. #67).
The Court hereby DENIES the motion as MOOT at this time.
Approximately one week prior to the October 18, 2024 Scheduling Conference, the Court will review the parties' joint report of attorney conference.
If the Court feels a Scheduling Conference is necessary, the Court will reschedule the conference; otherwise, the Court will cancel the conference and enter a Scheduling Order.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 92 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Document Biddle et al v. The Walt Disney Company, 5:22-cv-07317, No. 92 (N.D.Cal. Sep. 12, 2024)
Case Management Order
On September 12, 2024, the parties appeared before Judge Edward J. Davila for a case management conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any disputes with respect to discovery or disclosure are referred to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen.
Within ten days from entry of this order, the parties shall contact Judge van Keulen’s chambers to schedule an initial discovery conference.
Subject to further order by Judge van Keulen, by October 11, 2024, the parties shall file a joint Case No.: 5:22-cv-07317-EJD
The actual hearing on the motion may be noticed for a date subsequent after contacting Judge Davila’s courtroom deputy.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 63 ORDER: On September 11, 2024, the Court held a hearing on Defendants joint motion to stay discovery ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 63 (E.D.Va. Sep. 11, 2024)
each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
On September 11, 2024, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ joint motion to stay
The Motion is GRANTED as to all depositions, including 30(b)(6) depositions, and the Motion is DENIED as to document discovery and interrogatories; and it is further
ORDERED that the pending motion for a protective order, seeking to quash the noticed 30(b)(6) depositions, be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice as moot.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to all counsel of record.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 62 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Anthony J Trenga:Motion Hearing held ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 62 (E.D.Va. Sep. 11, 2024)
Appearances of Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant Counsel for Plaintiff Andrew Williamson Yavar Bathaee Counsel for Defendant Amanda Davidoff Bryan Fratkin David Gelfand John Moran Motion to/for: [46] Motion to Stay Discovery Temporarily Pending Resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss by deft.
Argued and ( ) Denied ( ) Granted ( ) Taken Under Advisement (X) Granted in part/Denied in part ( ) Continued to (X) Order to Follow
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 59 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Edward Grauman for Tyler Baker,Edward Grauman ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 59 (E.D.Va. Sep. 6, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
I certify that the rules of the federal court in the district in which I maintain my office extend a similar pro hac vice admission privilege to members of the bar of the Eastern District of Virginia.
I am am not a full-time employee of the United States of America, and if so, request exemption from the admission fee.
I affirm that his/her personal and professional character and standing are good, and petition the court to admit the applicant pro hac vice.
Clerk’s Fee Paid or Exemption Granted The motion for admission is GRANTED or DENIED (Judge’s Signature) 09/06/2024 (Date) Tyler Baker et al. v. Capital One Financial Servs.
et al. Tyler Baker and Laura Grodnick Edward Grauman 24081931
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 54 ORDERED:1. Plaintiffs will file a response to Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery Temporarily ...

Document Baker et al v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., et al, 1:24-cv-01265, No. 54 (E.D.Va. Sep. 3, 2024)
et al., Judge Anthony J. Trenga Defendants.
Order Upon consideration of the Consent Motion to Expedite Briefing and Oral Argument, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED: 1.
Plaintiffs will file a response to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery Temporarily Pending Resolution of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 46) by Thursday, September 5, 2024; 2.
Defendants will file a reply in support of the Motion to Stay Discovery Temporarily Pending Resolution of the Motion to Dismiss by Monday, September 9, 2024; 3.
Oral argument on the Motion to Stay Discovery Temporarily Pending Resolution of the Motion to Dismiss will take place Wednesday, September 11, 2024 at 10:00 AM. Alexandria, Virginia September 3, 2024
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... >>