Search court records - party Daniel Reisner, page 5

Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman - Certificate of Word Count

Document Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al., 21-757, Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Feb. 9, 2023)

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PROFESSOR ROBIN FELDMAN IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS in the above entitled case complies with the typeface requirement of Supreme Court Rule 33.1(b), being prepared in New Century Schoolbook 12 point for the text and 10 point for the footnotes, and this brief contains 7994 words, excluding the parts that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d), as needed.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of February, 2023.

I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.

Cite Document

Analyze

Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman - Main Document

Document Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al., 21-757, Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman, Main Document (U.S. Feb. 9, 2023)

... examples,”33 the court noted (i) that “there are three claimed residues [i.e., amino acids in PCSK9] to which not one disclosed example binds,” and (ii) that “although the claims include antibodies that bind up to sixteen residues, none ...

Cite Document

Analyze

Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman - Proof of Service

Document Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al., 21-757, Amicus brief of Professor Robin Feldman, Proof of Service (U.S. Feb. 9, 2023)

I, Andrew Cockle, of lawful age, being duly sworn, upon my oath state that I did, on the 9th day of February, 2023, send out from Omaha, NE 3 package(s) containing 3 copies of the BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PROFESSOR ROBIN FELDMAN IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS in the above entitled case.

All parties required to be served have been served by Priority Mail.

Packages were plainly addressed to the following:

I am duly authorized under the laws of the State of Nebraska to administer oaths.

Attorneys for Petitioners Jeffrey Alan Lamken Counsel of Record MoloLamken LLP The Watergate, Suite 500 600 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief of Sanofi et al submitted - Certificate of Word Count

Document Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al., 21-757, Brief of Sanofi et al submitted, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Feb. 3, 2023)

Briefs and Records Supreme Court of the United States United States Courts of Appeals

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33. l(h), I certify that the Brief for Respondents contains 13,000 words, excluding the parts of the Brief that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33. l(d).

(800) 890.5001 www.beckergallagher.com 8790 Governor's Hill Drive Suite 102 Cincinnati, Ohio 45249 Franklin Square 1300 I Street, NW, Suite 400E Washington, DC 20005

State of Ohio County of Hamilton I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires :-ebruary 14, 2r1, J

Cite Document

Analyze

Brief of Sanofi et al submitted - Main Document

Document Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al., 21-757, Brief of Sanofi et al submitted, Main Document (U.S. Feb. 3, 2023)

... was no “adequate guidance beyond the narrow scope of the working examples that the patent’s ‘roadmap’ produce[s].” Pet.App.14a; see Pet.App.13a n.1 (“[A]lthough the claims include antibodies that bind up to sixteen residues, none ...

Two of Amgen’s cited treatises predate modern claiming practice but nonetheless confirm that the patent specification must enable the entire invention without experimentation.

... relies—similarly explains that the patent must enable an artisan to practice the claimed invention “without experiment or the exercise of his own inventive skill.” 2 W. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions §515 (1890).6 None ...

Under the doctrine of equivalents, “a product or process that does not literally infringe upon the express terms of a patent claim may nonetheless be found to infringe if there is ‘equivalence’ between the elements of the accused 46 ...

Cite Document

Analyze