• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 1,034 results

Bayer Corporation, et al. v. Rene Leach, et al.

Docket 20S-CT-00354, Indiana State, Supreme Court (June 12, 2020)
Loretta H. Rush, presiding
Case TypeCT - Civil Tort
TagsCt, Civil Tort, Tort, Civil
Appellant Bayer Corporation
Appellee Rene Leach
Appellant Bayer Essure Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Kristiana Burrell v. Bayer Corporation

Docket 17-1715, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit (June 12, 2017)
Tags3367 Tort, Tort, Civil
Plaintiff - Appellant KRISTIANA TWEED BURRELL, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Ariel Grace Burrell
Plaintiff - Appellant TRAVIS BURRELL
Defendant - Appellee BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC et al

Docket 3:20-cv-00009, California Southern District Court (Jan. 2, 2020)
Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, presiding, Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin
Contract - Other
DivisionSan Diego
FlagsCLOSED, ., ENE, SEALDC
Demand$5,000,000
Cause21:0332(a) Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Plaintiff Brittany Sebastian
Defendant One Brands, LLC
Defendant The Hershey Company
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 00805201467 MOTION to withdraw as appointed counsel, filed by Attorney Natalie Christmas for Appellee State ...

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805201467 (8th Cir. Feb. 21, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Comes now, Natalie P. Christmas, counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee, State of Florida, respectfully moves to withdraw as an attorney of record in this matter.
Ms. Christmas will be leaving the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida in the coming weeks to pursue another opportunity.
Plaintiff-Appellee will continue to be represented by Deputy Solicitor General, Allen Huang.
I certify that this motion complies with the length limitations in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(2)(A), because, excluding the part exempted by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(f), it contains 64 words.
This document complies with the typeface and type-style requirements in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d), Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(a)(5), and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(a)(6), because it has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface in 14-point Garamond font using Microsoft Word.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805195112 MOTION to hold case in abeyance Reason for abeyance:to allow new agency officials to familiarize ...

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805195112 (8th Cir. Feb. 11, 2025)
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27, defendants-appellants the United States of America and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) respectfully move to hold this appeal in abeyance for 60 days.
This appeal concerns a challenge to a final rule issued by CMS in 2024 that, among other things, states that recipients of deferred action under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program are considered “lawfully present in the United States” for certain purposes under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and consequently may be eligible to obtain health insurance on an ACA exchange and to receive certain federal subsidies.
The federal government appealed the district court’s Appellate Case: 24-3521 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2025 Entry ID: 5484863
Due to the recent change in administration on January 20, 2025, CMS and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are now under new leadership.
As a result, the federal government respectfully suggests that this appeal be placed in abeyance for 60 days to allow HHS and CMS time to complete their evaluation.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805158677 MOTION To Exceed Word Limit, filed by Attorney Adam Thomas Steinhilber for Appellee State of ...

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805158677 (8th Cir. Dec. 18, 2024)
Plaintiffs request this increase of the word limit so that all parties will have a fair opportunity to present their arguments for the Court.
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(a)(3)(A) would normally afford Plaintiffs ten days to file such a response, which would allow time to fully formulate and condense their Appellate Case: 24-3521 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2024 Entry ID: 5467921
Because Plaintiffs capture the views of multiple parties in one response, a modest increase in the word limit is reasonable.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court permit their Response to exceed the word limit.
Counsel for the State of Florida Appellate Case: 24-3521 Page: 5 Date Filed: 12/18/2024 Entry ID: 5467921
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805155554 MOTION for stay pending appeal, filed by Attorney Leif Eric Overvold for Appellants Centers ...

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805155554 (8th Cir. Dec. 13, 2024)
Motion to Stay
Nonetheless, plaintiffs waited three months to file suit, and then delayed three more weeks before seeking a preliminary injunction, leaving the district court and parties only two months before individuals began enrolling in health- ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

AT&T Intellectual Property II v. Matal

Docket 16-1830, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (Apr. 12, 2016)
Appellant AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Appellee LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
Intervenor JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions & Duties of Director of the US Patent & Trademark Ofc
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 00805050785

Document United States v. State of Iowa, et al, 24-2265, No. 00805050785 (8th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805203642

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805203642 (8th Cir. Feb. 24, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805200402

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805200402 (8th Cir. Feb. 19, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805199368

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805199368 (8th Cir. Feb. 18, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Chevron Mining v. United States, et al

Docket 15-2209, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit (Nov. 24, 2015)
Environmental Matters (Appeals)

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 00805158689

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805158689 (8th Cir. Dec. 18, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 00805157289

Document State of Kansas, et al v. United States, et al, 24-3521, No. 00805157289 (8th Cir. Dec. 17, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>