Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 920 (S.D.Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)
Motion for Judgment
If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States attorney of any material change '- e »efendant's economic circumstances.
E] The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court’s determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future sub stance abuse.
Not knowingly associate with any known probationer, parolee, or gang member, including but not limited to any Crips affiliate, or anyone specifically disapproved by the probation officer.
Participate in a program ofdrug or alcohol abuse treatment, including urinalysis or sweat patch testing and counseling, as directed by the probation officer.
May be required to contribute to the costs of services rendered in an amount to be determined by the probation officer, based on the defendant's ability to pay.
Cite Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 920 (S.D.Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 907 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)
Motion for Judgment
Title & Section 18 USC 1962(d) Nature of Offense Conspiracy to Conduct Enterprise Affairs Through A Pattern of Racketeering Activity Count Numbergsl The defefidant I5 Sentenced 35 P"°Vlded in Pages 2 thmugh __4__0f this judgment.
E] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: El E] as notified by the United States Marshal.
D The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court’s determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Participate in a program of drug or alcohol abuse treatment, including urinalysis or sweat patch testing and counseling, as directed by the probation officer.
May be required to contribute to the costs of services rendered in an amount to be determined by the probation officer, based on the defendant's ability to pay.
Cite Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 907 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 836 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 13, 2012)
Motion for Judgment
Accordingly, the defendant is adjudged guilty of such count(s), which involve the following offense(s): Count Numbergsj Title & Section Nature of Offense 18 USC 1962(d) Conspiracy to Conduct Enterprise Affairs Through A Pattern of Racketeering Activity The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
I: The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court’s determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
If this judgment imposes a fine or restitution obligation, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay any such fine ' or restitution that remains unpaid at the commencement ofthe term of supervised release in accordance with the Schedule of Payments set forth in this judgment.
Participate in a program of drug or alcohol abuse treatment, including urinalysis or sweat patch testing and counseling, as directed by the probation officer.
May be required to contribute to the costs of services rendered in an amount to be determined by the probation officer, based on the defendant's ability to pay.
Cite Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 836 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 13, 2012)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 814 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 7, 2012)
Motion for Judgment
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and upon the motion of the Government, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Superseding Indictment in the above entitled case against defendants Hitesh Vinod Patel and Gayatri Investments, LLC is dismissed without prejudice.
The defendants are hereby discharged.
United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Cite Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 814 (S.D.Cal. Mar. 7, 2012)
+ More Snippets
Docket
D045553,
California State Court of Appeals, Fourth District
(Dec. 17, 2004)
Richard D. Huffman, Cynthia G. Aaron, Judith L. Haller, presiding
Case Type | CR |
Petitioner | Leonard Moore |
Respondent | The People |
Cite Docket
In re LEONARD MOORE on Habeas Corpus, D045553 (Cal. Ct. App., 4th Dist.)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 536 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)
Motion for Judgment
E] The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court’s detennination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Participate in a program of drug or alcohol abuse treatment, including urinalysis testing and counseling, as directed by the ' probation officer.
Not have unsupervised contact with any child under the age of 18, unless in the presence of a supervising adult (who is aware of the defendant's deviant sexual behavior and conviction), and with the prior approval of the probation officer.
Not be employed in or participate in any volunteer activity that involves contact with children under the age of 18, except under circumstances approved in advance (and in writing) by the probation officer.
Shall not associate with any known probationer, parolee, or gang member, including but not limited to any Insane Crips affiliate, NWS, or anyone specifically disapproved by the probation officer.
Cite Document
USA v. Traylor et al, 3:11-cr-01448, No. 536 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)
+ More Snippets
Document
United States of America v. Toycen et al, 3:03-cr-00531, No. 1082 (S.D.Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by thisjudgment are fully paid.
If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States attorney of any material change In the defendant’s economic circumstances.
E] The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's detennination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in which he or she resides, works, is a student, or was convicted of a qualifying offense.
The Court authorizes the release of the presentence report and available psychological evaluations to the mental health provider, as approved by the probation officer.
Cite Document
United States of America v. Toycen et al, 3:03-cr-00531, No. 1082 (S.D.Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
+ More Snippets
Docket
S121360,
California State Supreme Court
(Dec. 19, 2003)
Pub/Depublication Requestor | San Joaquin County Public Defender |
Petitioner | A. A. |
Respondent | Superior Court Of San Diego County |
Cite Docket
A. (A.) v. S.C. (PEOPLE), S121360 (Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 489 (S.D.Cal. Sep. 2, 2010)
Motion for Judgment
l:l C0Unt(S) Assessment: $100.00 at the rate of $3.00 per quarter through the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, with the balance remaining due within six (6) months of release.
, El Forfeiture pursuant to order filed Fine waived IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.
U The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court‘s determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Ifthis judgment imposes a fine or restitution obligation, it is a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay any such fine or restitution that remains unpaid at the commencement ofthe term of supervised release in accordance with the Schedule of Payments set forth in this judgment.
The Court authorizes the release of the presentence report and available psychological evaluations to the mental health provider, as approved by the probation officer.
Cite Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 489 (S.D.Cal. Sep. 2, 2010)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 477 (S.D.Cal. Jul. 26, 2010)
Motion for Judgment
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of an change of name, _ residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and s ecial assessments imposed by this Judgment are ful y aid.
If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and Unite States attorney of any material change in the defen ant’s economic circumstances.
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a tenn of Eighty-Seven (87) Months
Provide com lete disclosure of all personal and business financial records to the probation o ficer when requested.
The Courttauthorizes the release of the re-sentence report and available psychological evaluations to the mental ealth provider, as approved by the robation officer._ The defendant shall consent to the release of evaluations and reatment information to the probation officer and the Court by the mental health provider.
Cite Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 477 (S.D.Cal. Jul. 26, 2010)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 472 (S.D.Cal. Jul. 8, 2010)
A separate itemization of the time involved in the multiple OSC proceedings with regard to the revocation of defendant’s pretrial release.
Legal research notes or summaries on cases reviewed, including citations, regarding the bail revocation issues;
of a medical Marijuana card, including copies of the materials reviewed, or a bibliography of same, whichever is most easy to produce;
A copy of the research associated with, and the audit report regarding, the Bureau of Prisons concerning the adequacy of medical care, including all notes, memos and summaries thereof;
Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\2 Orders to be filed\order re hearing on excess fees.wpd 08cr2288
Cite Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 472 (S.D.Cal. Jul. 8, 2010)
+ More Snippets
Docket
3:03-cr-00531,
California Southern District Court
(Feb. 21, 2003)
Judge Larry Alan Burns,
presiding.
Cite Docket
United States of America v. Toycen et al, 3:03-cr-00531 (S.D.Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
S113152,
California State Supreme Court
(Jan. 24, 2003)
Cite Docket
PEOPLE v. MEZA, S113152 (Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 396 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 26, 2010)
Cite Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 396 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 26, 2010)
+ More Snippets
Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 395 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 25, 2010)
Cite Document
USA v. Huynh et al, 3:08-cr-02288, No. 395 (S.D.Cal. Jan. 25, 2010)
+ More Snippets