Supreme Court of the United States

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document contains 7,935 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on February 24, 2023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Amanda Kellar Karras General Counsel 51 Monroe Street, Suite 404 Rockville, MD 20850 Attorney for Amicus Curiae International Municipal Lawyers Association National League of Cities 660 North Capitol Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Lauren Keefe City Attorney of Albuquerque One Civic Plaza, Fourth Floor Albuquerque, NM 87102 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Albuquerque, New Mexico Joanna C. Anderson City Attorney 301 King Street Suite 1300 Alexandria, VA 22314 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Alexandria, Virginia

2a Christopher D. Balch Balch Law Group 830 Glenwood Ave., SE Atlanta, GA 30316 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Brookhaven, Georgia Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago Myriam Zreczny Kasper Deputy Corporation Counsel 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 580 Chicago, IL 60602 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Chicago, Illinois Suellen Ferguson Council Baradel 125 West Street, Fourth Floor Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Attorney for Amicus Curiae College Park, Maryland Jo Anne Bernal El Paso County Attorney John E. Untereker Assistant County Attorney El Paso County Attorney’s Office 500 E. San Antonio Fifth Floor, Suite 503 El Paso, TX 79901 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae County of El Paso, Texas

5a Michael Haas City Attorney, City of Madison 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Room 401 Madison, WI 53703 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Madison, Wisconsin Margaret C. Daun Corporation Counsel Milwaukee County office of Corporation Counsel 901 N. 9th Street, Suite 303 Milwaukee, WI 53233 Attorney for Amicus Curiae County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin Kristyn Anderson City Attorney City of Minneapolis City Hall, Room 210 350 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Leslie J. Girard County Counsel 168 West Alisal Street, Third Floor Salinas, CA 93901 Attorney for Amicus Curiae County of Monterey, California

8a Sandra L. Kennedy Corporation Counsel 1200 S. County-City Building 227 W. Jefferson Blvd.

South Bend, IN 46601 Attorney for Amicus Curiae City of South Bend, Indiana Douglas C. Dalena Corporation Counsel and Director of Legal Affairs Law Department Stamford Government Center 888 Washington Boulevard, Ninth Floor Stamford, CT 06901 Attorney for Amicus Curiae Mayor Caroline Simmons and the City of Stamford, Connecticut Thomas A. Carr County Counsel 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 340, MS 24 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Attorney for Amicus Curiae Washington County, Oregon Eli Savit Washtenaw County Prosecuting Attorney 200 N. Main Street, Suite 300 Ann Arbor, MI 48107 Attorney for Amicus Curiae Washtenaw County Prosecuting Attorney, Michigan

No. 22-179 In THE Supreme Court of the Anited States

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33-1(h), I certify that the document contains 7,611 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Sworn to and subscribed before me this 24th day of February 2023.

District of Columbia _ My commission expires September 30, 2027.

No. 22-179 In the Supreme Court of the United States

On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that Brief of the Cato Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent contains 4,149 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).

1000 Mass.

8 Amici are not assuaged by the purportedly nar- rower (but nonetheless vague) interpretation of the “encourage[ ] or induce[ ]” language the federal govern- ment now proffers; the language on its face still threat- ens a broad array of our ...

Amici engage in none of the activities or speech described in this brief “for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain.” 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii).

None of this Court’s precedents suggest otherwise, contrary to 7 the Government’s representations.

RULE 33.1(h) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE No. 22-179

Respondent.

As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I, Stephen R. Sady, certify that the corrected amicus brief in the foregoing case contains 7,962 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d).

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on February 27, 2023.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 24, 2028, three (3) copies of the BRIEF OF ASIAN

Cal.

1115 H Street, N.E.

Pn vit— br on POM ee Fe, he “eG, = ie ~ S 2 Flyrw oe

Fix & yg iO: eee Uw FRE Be i os ey OAS “hy, PfrtestAQ s Cre, \ Oa ae