Search court records on patent:(6910069) - party Cameron Clark, page 9

No. 275 MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction for multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344, ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 275 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2017)

Instead, the court is free to attach the appropriate weight to appropriate sources 'in light of the statutes and policies that inform patent law."'

"In some cases, the ordinary meaning of claim language as understood by a person of skill in the art may be readily apparent even to lay judges, and claim construction in such cases involves little more than the application of the widely accepted meaning of commonly understood words."

Extrinsic evidence may assist the court in understanding the underlying technology, the meaning of terms to one skilled in the art, and how the invention works.

This citation provides that in one embodiment, seeking computers may reorder the first few port numbers created by a hashing algorithm.

For the reasons given above in connection with the previous term, I am changing "seeks" to "is configured" and striking "at all times" from Defendants' proposed construction.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- William Bryson
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
- Allen M. -SM- Terrell, JR.
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 276 MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying (21 in 16-cv-453-RGA, 22 in 16-cv-454-RGA, 23 in 16-cv-455-RGA) MOTION ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 276 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2017)

The Broadcast Claims meet the need for "a reliable communications network that is suitable for the simultaneous sharing of information among a large number of the processes that are widely distributed."

A. Motion to Dismiss Rule 8 requires a complainant to provide "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief .... " Fed. R. Civ.

"A claim has facial plausibility when the [complainant] pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the [accused] is liable for the misconduct alleged."

It provides: "Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title."

I t I t Defendants' argument, belatedly raised in their reply brief, that the Broadcast Claims are not physical or tangible structures and thus are not patent-eligible subject matter, is waived.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- William Bryson
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
- Allen M. -SM- Terrell, JR.
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 273 SPECIAL MASTER ORDER NO

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 273 (D.Del. Aug. 28, 2017)

INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., and 2K SPORTS, INC., Delaware Corporations, Defendants.

WHEREAS, the Special Master having considered Non-Party Sony Interactive Entertainment America, LLC’s Unopposed Motion to Intervene (“Sony’s Motion”); NOW, THEREFORE, on this 28th day of August, 2017, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Sony’s Motion is GRANTED; (2) the deadline for Sony to respond to Plaintiff’s August 16, 2017 Letter Brief is extended to and including two business days after the date of this Order; and (3) oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel will take place on September 6, 2017 rather than August 31, 2017.

Cite Document

Analyze