• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 69-83 of 2,183 results

Optima Media Group Limited et al v. Bloomberg L.P.

Docket 1:17-cv-01898, New York Southern District Court (Mar. 15, 2017)
Judge Alison J. Nathan, presiding, Magistrate Judge James L. Cott
Contract - Other
08/08/2019
... Order (ECF No. 90) be amended as follows: 1. The deadline for completion of all fact discovery including depositions of nonexpert witnesses shall be extended to November 15, 2019. 2. All...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Citigroup Inc., v. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority

Docket 1:17-cv-01528, New York Southern District Court (Mar. 1, 2017)
Judge P. Kevin Castel, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
DemandNone
Cause09:203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
Petitioner Citigroup Inc.
Respondent Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 9155

Document In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720, No. 9155 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 12383 ORDER that the request for an extension of time 12381 is GRANTED

Document MDL-2323 IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS' CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION, 2:12-md-02323, No. 12383 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 12, 2024)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
Kevin Turner and Shawn Wooden, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC, successor-in-interest to NFL Properties, Inc.
Audit of Byron Cuthbert and Associates,
WHEREAS, Byron Cuthbert and Associates, LLC, by and through its counsel JMeyers Group, LLC and the Cuthbert Firm, LLC, filed a Motion For Reconsideration in the above-captioned matter on March 4, 2024 (the “Motion,” ECF No. 12379); WHEREAS, the National Football League and NFL Properties LLC have requested an extension of time from March 18, 2024 to through and including April 1, 2024, to respond to the Motion; It is ORDERED that the request for an extension of time is GRANTED.
day of March, 2024. s/ANITA B. BRODY, J. Anita B. Brody United States District Court Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 12382 ORDER denying 12375 MOTION TO STAY; denying as moot 12376 MOTION TO STAY

Document MDL-2323 IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS' CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION, 2:12-md-02323, No. 12382 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 11, 2024)
Motion to StayDenied
They also agreed that either party could apply to a Pennsylvania state or federal court for interim or emergent relief “in the event of an emergent issue.” (Id.) In or around January 2024, Balanced Bridge commenced an arbitration action against the SCM with AAA on the question of the SCM’s efforts to collect an award.
Citing the contractual provision for jurisdiction in a federal court for an emergent issue, the SCM has moved here for a stay of that arbitration.
The SCM contends that the arbitration proceeding should be stayed based upon demands he expects Balanced Bridge to make of him in his pursuit of a monetary award under this Settlement.2 He also fears that Balanced Bridge will use the arbitration process to rewrite the terms of their Funding Agreement, suggesting 2 The SCM had not received a monetary award as of the time he filed his motion to stay the arbitration proceeding.
that Balanced Bridge is attempting “to control or curtail” his rights in the process by which he prepares and submits a claim under the Settlement.
AND NOW, this 11TH day of March, 2024, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Arbitration in AAA Case No. 01-23-0004-8971 (ECF No. 12375) is DENIED.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9151 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (previously filed under seal as 9140 ) re 8067 , 8097 , 8184 , and 8925 ...

Document In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720, No. 9151 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2024)
) In none of these cases, however, was the question of whether merchants were direct purchasers squarely before the court.
Separately, Plaintiffs contend that none of the merchant plaintiffs in this case pay “blended” fees, contrary to Defendants’ assertions.
... but see McCarthy v. Recordex Srv., Inc., 80 F.3d 842, 852 (3d Cir. 1996) (finding plaintiffs were indirect purchasers because “none of the plaintiffs retained their lawyers to act as mere purchasing agents whose sole objective and function ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9147 STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice as to all claims by Amazon Plaintiffs, as ...

Document In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720, No. 9147 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2024)
7-Eleven, Inc., et al. v. Visa Inc., et al., 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. v. Visa Inc., et al., In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Plaintiff be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
(and as successor to Chase Bank USA, N.A.)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: ( 22 A Benjamin R. Nagin ThomasA.
TYLER LLP / By: ey Willi .
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011011736152 ORDER: The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the ...

Document PDVSA US Litigation Trust v. Lukoil Pan Americas, LLC, et al, 19-10950, No. 011011736152 (11th Cir. May. 7, 2021)
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 David J. Smith Clerk of Court For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov
Appeal Number: 19-10950-AA Case Style: PDVSA US Litigation Trust v. Lukoil Pan Americas, LLC, et al District Court Docket No: 1:18-cv-20818-DPG The enclosed order has been entered on petition(s) for rehearing.
REHG-1 Ltr Order Petition Rehearing
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9138

Document In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720, No. 9138 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 417

Document Cardwell v. Davis Polk and Wardwell LLP et al, 1:19-cv-10256, No. 417 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 387

Document Cardwell v. Davis Polk and Wardwell LLP et al, 1:19-cv-10256, No. 387 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 382

Document Cardwell v. Davis Polk and Wardwell LLP et al, 1:19-cv-10256, No. 382 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011011650171

Document PDVSA US Litigation Trust v. Lukoil Pan Americas, LLC, et al, 19-10950, No. 011011650171 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 372

Document Cardwell v. Davis Polk and Wardwell LLP et al, 1:19-cv-10256, No. 372 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9031

Document In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720, No. 9031 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... >>