• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-53 of 2,374 results

No. 729 ORDER granting 728 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 729 (S.D.Fla. Jan. 31, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as CounselGranted
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Withdraw by Sarah N. Westcot, Andrew J. Obergfell, and Bursor & Fisher, P.A., as Counsel for Plaintiff Aaron Fassinger [ECF No. 728].
Within three (3) days of the entry of this Order, withdrawing counsel shall send to Plaintiff, Aaron Fassinger’s last known address(es) a copy of this Order and file a notice with the Court certifying same.
Plaintiff, Aaron Fassinger, shall, by February 14, 2025, either: (a) retain new counsel, and new counsel shall file a notice of appearance, or (b) file a notice of intent to proceed pro se.
Failure to do so may result in a dismissal of this action without further notice as to this Plaintiff.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 729 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2025 Page 2 of 2 DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 31st day of January, 2025.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 722 ORDER granting 721 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (Other) to 718 Response in Opposition ...

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 722 (S.D.Fla. Jan. 27, 2025)
Motion to Extend Time to File ReplyGranted
_________________________________/ This Document Relates to the Following Actions: Krumenacker v. Robinhood Fin., LLC, No. 21-cv-21343 (S.D.
This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Robinhood’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply [ECF No. 721].
Robinhood requests a two-week extension of time — up to and including February 10, 2025 — to file a reply to the opposition [ECF No. 718] filed by the Plaintiffs in the Quat and Krumenacker actions referenced above.
Being fully advised, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [ECF No. 721] is GRANTED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 25th day of January, 2025.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 903 OPINION AND ORDER re: (889 in 1:21-md-03010-PKC, 889 in 1:21-md-03010-PKC) MOTION to Compel ...

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 903 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2025)
Nonetheless, on a motion to compel arbitration, we may determine that an agreement to arbitrate exists where the notice of the arbitration provision was reasonably conspicuous and manifestation of assent unambiguous as a matter of ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 603 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 603 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2025)
JEANNETTE A. VARGAS, United States District Judge: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned.
All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Practices, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jeannette-vargas.
Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case’s reassignment.
Nothing herein shall affect the scope of the existing reference to the Magistrate Judge.
Any conference or oral argument before or directed by the Magistrate Judge will proceed as ordered.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 602 ORDER Pursuant to the telephonic status conference held today, January 6, 2025, the Court ...

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 602 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2025)
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the telephonic status conference held today, January 6, 2025, the Court orders as follows: 1.
Consistent with the Honorable Kimba Wood’s Order at ECF No. 599, the parties shall file a joint proposed discovery schedule (the “Proposed Schedule”) by Friday, January 10, 2025.
The Proposed Schedule may be up to five (5) pages in length and must contain proposed deadlines for the following items: a. Substantial completion of document production.
A follow-up telephonic status conference is scheduled for Tuesday, January 14, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. on the Court’s Microsoft Teams platform (the “Conference”).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 601 OPINION AND ORDER re: 585 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 577 Memorandum & Opinion . filed by ...

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 601 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2024)
Motion for ReconsiderationDenied
“Reconsideration of a court’s previous order is an ‘extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources.’” Parrish v. Sollecito, 253 F. Supp.
A court should not grant a motion for reconsideration “where the moving party seeks solely to relitigate an issue already decided.” Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995).
Defendant instead reiterates arguments about updated policies and procedures that the Court explicitly considered before it issued its Opinion & Order.
Defendant fails to explain why these updated policies and procedures would alter the conclusion reached by the Court as to commonality and typicality.
The evidence that Plaintiff submitted raised common questions as to “whether ACS’s placement practices fulfill its responsibility to place Plaintiffs in appropriate homes” and “whether ACS ensures that training, case management and permanency planning practices ... lessen the risk of injury for children in its custody.” (Opinion & Order, at 8, 11.)
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 716 ORDER granting 715 Motion to Establish Briefing Schedule

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 716 (S.D.Fla. Dec. 16, 2024)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants, Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, and Robinhood Securities, LLC’s (“Robinhood[’s]”) Motion to Establish Briefing Schedule [ECF No. 715], filed on December 13, 2024.
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [ECF No. 715] is GRANTED.
The remaining Plaintiffs shall file their response(s) to Robinhood’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Stay Pending Arbitration [ECF No. 713] by January 13, 2025.
Robinhood has until January 27, 2025 to file its reply.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 16th day of December, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 712 MANDATE of USCA (certified copy)

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 712 (S.D.Fla. Dec. 5, 2024)
We fol- low the precedent of the state’s highest court unless none is availa- ble.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

WAYNE L. HARVELL ET AL VS. PG&E CORPORATION ET AL

Docket CGC-17-561937, California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court (Oct. 17, 2017)
Case TypeOTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS
Plaintiff Delzell Katherine R.
Plaintiff Delzell Skyler H.
Defendant Does
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 593 ORDER denying 587 Letter Motion to Stay ; denying 588 Letter Motion to Stay

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 593 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2024)
Motion to StayDenied
It is well-established that “discovery should not be routinely stayed simply on the basis that a potentially dispositive motion has been filed.” P.C. v. Driscoll, No. 24-CV-2496 (LJL), 2024 WL 3606511, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2024) (quoting Moran v. Flaherty, No. 92 Civ.
Plaintiffs continue to believe the City and State are out of compliance with constitutional and applicable statutory standards, as set forth in Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification, filed on July 30, 2019 (Dkt. No. 439).
Moreover, as time passes, witnesses with critical testimony of the adverse impacts of Defendants’ policies and practices—including victims of maltreatment who deserve the opportunity to tell their stories in court—may become unavailable or their memories may fade.
The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration is strict, and “reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked—matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Cho v. BlackBerry Ltd., 991 F.3d 155, 170 (2d Cir. 2021) (quoting Van Buskirk v. United Grp.
But of course the reason Plaintiffs do not have more admissible evidence regarding the City’s and State’s more recent practices is simple: Defendants have not provided fact discovery since the spring of 2019 and continue to refuse to do so.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 708 ORDER All claims brought by Plaintiffs Uniqueka Best, Rasheed Best, Jacob Rosmarin, and Ariel ...

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 708 (S.D.Fla. Oct. 18, 2024)
According to the Stipulation, these Plaintiffs and Robinhood have agreed to a voluntary dismissal of all claims with prejudice.
All parties have acknowledged that the other has complied with Rule 11 and waive any arguments related thereto.
The parties have agreed that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the agreement entered by Plaintiffs with Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs’ individual claims.
All claims brought by Plaintiffs Uniqueka Best, Rasheed Best, Jacob Rosmarin, and Ariel Rubenstein are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the agreement entered into by Plaintiffs with Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs’ individual claims.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 883 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF KININ, INC

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 883 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2024)
Motion for Voluntary Dismissal
This Document Relates To:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties and their respective counsel that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the individual claims of Plaintiff Kinin, Inc. are voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, from the above-captioned actions, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.
This stipulation shall not be read to dismiss any of the claims of any other MDL plaintiffs.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 21 ORDER granting 694 Second Motion to Sever filed in case 21-md-2989

Document Lagmanson et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al, 1:24-cv-08721, No. 21 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 19, 2024)
Motion to SeverGranted
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs, Marcus Lagmanson, Anthony Reyes, and Brian Belderrain’s Second Amended Motion ... to Sever Their Claims [ECF No. 694], filed on August 15, 2024.
The Court held a Status Conference [ECF No. 699] on September 18, 2024.
Defendants do not oppose severance of Plaintiffs’ consolidated case and transfer of the action to the District in which it was originally filed.
ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion [ECF No. 694] is GRANTED.
cc: DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 18th day of September, 2024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 881 ORDER granting in part 878 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 881 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 17, 2024)
Motion to File DocumentGranted
... records reflect, none of the three named Advertiser Plaintiffs opted out of the arbitration agreement. No Advertiser Plaintiff has produced any evidence suggesting that they opted out of the arbitration requirement, and there is none.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 880 REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER granting 875 Letter Motion for Extension ...

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 880 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2024)
Case 1:21-md-03010-PKC Document 880_Filed 09/10/24 Page1of1 Filed 08/30/24 Page 2 of 2
For good cause shown, the Court hereby grants MDL Plaintiffs’ unopposed requestto amend the Scheduling Order (Pre-Trial Order No. 5, Dkt. No. 394) and Amended Case
The amended deadlines are as follows:
Plaintiffs’ Opening Expert Reports Defendants’ Responsive Expert Reports Plaintiffs’ Rebuttal Expert Reports Expert Discovery Cutoff Pre-Motion Letter for Summary Judgment Motions and Class Certification Motions
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>