• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 2,374 results

No. 56 Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Erik Chavez and Peter Jang

Document Peter Jang, et al v. Apex Clearing Corporation, 23-10436, No. 56 (11th Cir. Oct. 8, 2024)
We fol- low the precedent of the state’s highest court unless none is availa- ble.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Opinion

Document Angel Guzman, et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al, 22-11873 (11th Cir. Jun. 26, 2024)
The events giving rise to the suit took place during a short period of market volatility caused by aggressive trading in a handful of securities.1 Purchases of the relevant securities grew rapidly during the week before January 27, 2021, due to their surging popularity among retail investors in the online community.
1 The relevant securities, referred to colloquially as “meme stocks” due to their popularity in online discussion forums, include GameStop (“GME”), AMC Entertainment (“AMC”), Bed Bath & Beyond (“BBBY”), BlackBerry (“BB”), Express (“EXPR”), Koss (“KOSS”), Nokia (“NOK”), Tootsie Roll Industries (“TR”), and Trivago NV (“TRVG”).
The instant appeal concerns only one of those four tranches—the “Antitrust Tranche.” On July 27, 2021, Plaintiffs in the Antitrust Tranche filed the original Consolidated Class Action Complaint, asserting conspiracy claims against multiple brokers, including Robinhood, and one market maker, Citadel.
9 The Amended Complaint also describes tense communications between representatives of Citadel and Robinhood in the days leading up to and following the trading restrictions, which Plaintiffs allege are indicative of an agreement between Defendants to prohibit purchases of the relevant securities.
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Document: 75-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2024 Page: 23 of 24 Opinion of the Court suffered an injury resulting from the anticompetitive effects in a relevant market sufficient to confer antitrust standing.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Opinion

Document Donnahue George v. Ken Griffin, et al, 21-14208 (11th Cir. Jan. 31, 2024)
Plaintiff filed this pro se action on August 17, 2021, asserting claims against an individual and several corporate entities involved in the January 2021 GameStop short selling incident and other al- leged stock market manipulation schemes.
In support of the motion, Plaintiff claimed he had made several un- successful attempts to perfect service by a professional process server, and he submitted evidence in the form of a certified mail return receipt that all these defendants were aware of the lawsuit.
USCA11 Case: 21-14208 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 01/31/2024 Page: 6 of 13 Opinion of the Court Shortly thereafter, defendants FINRA and DTCC submitted a waiver of service, leaving the SEC, WeBull Financial LLC, and CFTC to be served.
Instead, Plaintiff inexplicably ar- gued that he was unaware of the deadline for filing an amended complaint because he did not receive notice of orders entered in the case until they were mailed to him, and that he recently had to travel to the Dominican Republic to care for his elderly father.
As discussed below, we conclude that Plaintiff has filed his appeal prematurely and without giving the district court the opportunity to rule on his latest pending motion to reopen the case and/or to order Defendants to participate in the scheduling process.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 59 Judgment entered as to Appellants Jonathan Cornwell, Joseph Daniluk, Sammy Gonzalez, Edward ...

Document Andrea Juncadella, et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC, et al, 22-10669, No. 59 (11th Cir. Aug. 10, 2023)
Motion for Judgment
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket Nos. 1:21-md-02989-CMA,
It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the opinion issued on this date in this appeal is entered as the judgment of this Court.
Entered: August 10, 2023 For the Court: DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court
cite Cite Document
Analyze

SHERRI QUAMMEN ET AL VS. PG&E CORPORATION ET AL

Docket CGC-18-571281, California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court (Nov. 13, 2018)
Case TypeMASS TORT
TagsMass Tort, Tort, Civil
Plaintiff Acosta Mayra
Plaintiff Baldwin Charles F
Plaintiff Bell Brian
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 619 ORDER, The Court orders as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time to file ...

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 619 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2025)
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the telephonic status conference held today, March 26, 2025, the Court orders as follows: 1.
Plaintiffs’ request for an extension of time to file any motion to amend (“MTA”) and proposed amended complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file any MTA is EXTENDED to Friday, April 11, 2025. b.
d. The Amended Case Management Plan at ECF No. 605 otherwise remains in effect.
A follow-up status conference is scheduled for Wednesday, April 23, 2025 at 2:30 p.m. EST on the Court’s Microsoft Teams platform (the “Conference”).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 925 ORDER with respect to 923 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 925 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2025)
Motion to File Document
... 2 of 4 Case 1:21-md-03010-PKC Document 923 Filed 03/13/25 Page 2 of 4 Hon. P. Kevin Castel March 13, 2025 Page 2 of arbitration for one version of the terms of service but not another would be subject to arbitration for all, none, ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 924 ORDER GRANTING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE granting 922 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 924 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Before the Court is a Motion to Withdraw Thaizza Rodriguez Pagán as Counsel for
Plaintiff the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in the above-numbered and entitled cause.
The Court has determined that the motion should be granted.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Thaizza Rodriguez Pagán is withdrawn as counsel for Plaintiff the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and shall be removed from the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) notification in the above-numbered and entitled cause.
United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 736 ORDER denying 720 Motion to Recommend Days for Remand

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 736 (S.D.Fla. Mar. 13, 2025)
Motion to RemandDenied
This multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) arises from trading restrictions imposed by Robinhood during the January 2021 short squeeze involving so-called “meme stocks.” (Mot.
On March 15, 2021, Days filed his Second Amended Complaint in the Northern District of California, alleging federal securities and state law claims arising from Robinhood’s transition to in-house clearing and other, related misrepresentations.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 736 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2025 Page 3 of 6 Days contends that, with MDL proceedings concluded and his claims still unresolved, the
Ultimately, when pre-trial proceedings remain ongoing, “the question of whether remand is nevertheless appropriate is left to the discretion of the [JPML].” In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 736 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2025 Page 4 of 6
Days argues that because the MDL’s pretrial proceedings have concluded, and his state- law concealment and negligent misrepresentation claims remain unresolved, the Court should recommend remand of his case to the Northern District of California.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 735 ORDER of Dismissal as to FCT Claims (With Prejudice)

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 735 (S.D.Fla. Mar. 7, 2025)
One or more disputes arose between Plaintiffs and Defendants relating to the Relevant Securities, including the litigations styled Gossett v. Robinhood Financial LLC, No. 21- cv- 00837 (C.D.
All Parties have acknowledged that the other has complied with Rule 11 and waive any arguments related thereto.
This Order represents only a partial dismissal of the Gossett and Scarborough matters regarding the individual claims of the Plaintiffs specifically named herein.
Parties have agreed that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the agreement entered into by Plaintiffs with Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs’ individual claims.
Being fully advised, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) all claims brought by Plaintiffs Josh Gossett, James Laplant, Danielle Perreault, and Maurice Scarborough, are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the agreement entered into by Plaintiffs with Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs’ individual claims.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 615 ORDER, As discussed at the telephonic status conference held today, February 27, 2025, a follow-up ...

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 615 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2025)
Plaintiffs, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
As discussed at the telephonic status conference held today, February 27, 2025, a follow- up status conference is scheduled for Wednesday, March 26, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. EST on the Court’s Microsoft Teams platform (the “Conference”).
By Friday, March 21, 2025, the parties shall file a joint letter identifying any issues about which they have met and conferred and are ripe for the Court’s consideration at the Conference.
United States Magistrate Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 732 ORDER re 713 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and for Stay Pending Arbitration

Document IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 1:21-md-02989, No. 732 (S.D.Fla. Feb. 12, 2025)
Motion to Compel Arbitration (Arbitration Demand)
_________________________________/ This Document Relates to All Actions THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte.
and Robinhood Securities, LLC’s (“Robinhood”) filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration ... [ECF No. 713].
Following this, on January 29, 2025, Robinhood and Plaintiffs — Abe Kurdi, Eric Quat, Igor Kravchenko, Jordan Krumenacker, Michael McFadden, Michael Ross, Teodoro Russell Pueyrredon, and Tenzin Woiser — filed a Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice [ECF No. 725].
Prior to this settlement, Robinhood suggested that the resolution “may narrow the remaining issues” raised in the Motion.
ORDERED that Robinhood shall, by February 17, 2025, advise the Court which issues, if any, in its Motion to Compel Arbitration ... [ECF No. 713] are moot.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 906 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL in case 1:21-md-03010-PKC; granting (47) Motion ...

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 906 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as CounselGranted
) GOOGLE LLC and ALPHABET, INC., ) Defendants.
Upon consideration of counsel’s Motion to Withdraw Appearance, it is hereby ORDERED on this ____ day of ________________ that the Motion is GRANTED.
Accordingly, Mark R. Meador is hereby WITHDRAWN as counsel for Plaintiff Rumble Canada, Inc.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Mark R. Meador’s name from the CM/ECF service list for this matter.
Southern District of New York
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 608 ORDER: As discussed at the telephonic status conference held today, February 10, 2025, a follow-up ...

Document Elisa W. et al v. The City Of New York , et al, 1:15-cv-05273, No. 608 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2025)
Plaintiffs, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
As discussed at the telephonic status conference held today, February 10, 2025, a follow- up status conference is scheduled for Thursday, February 27, 2025 at 3:00 p.m. EST on the Court’s Microsoft Teams platform (the “Conference”).
By Monday, February 24, 2025, the parties shall file a joint letter identifying any issues about which they have met and conferred and are ripe for the Court’s consideration at the Conference.
United States Magistrate Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 907

Document In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation, 1:21-md-03010, No. 907 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>