The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 were read on this motion to/for

Upon the foregoing documents, the motion is granted without opposition and the action is discontinued as to Defendant Simone Enderonly.

[| otHerd-S-C. 850127/2021 RL 900 PARK LLC vs. CENTRAL PARK PARTNERSNY LLC ET AL Motion No. 005 Page 1 of 1

“[I]n determining whether to grant leave to amend the court must examine the underlying merits of the causes of action asserted therein, since to do otherwise would constitute a waste of judicial resources” (Glenn Partition, Inc. v Trs.

1 Defendant Prodigy Network LLC failed to answer or otherwise respond to the initial complaint in this action, and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on March 25, 2021 (NYSCEF 30 at 2 n.2).

These new factual allegations and evidence support SRC’s argument that the Committee members intended the SRC to carry forward their collective rights under the RSA.

As a result, PSIM’s alleged failure to provide documents to SRC cannot form the basis of a viable claim for breach of contract (Assured Guar.

Such rights might have provided the basis to seek contemporaneous injunctive relief with respect to access to information or requesting amendment, for example, precisely because the alleged breaches “may not be compensable by non-speculative damages” later on (Hemmings v Ivy League Apt.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 58, 59, 66 were read on this motion to/for

CENTRAL PARK PARTNE Motion No. 002

ORDEREDthat, pursuant to CPLR 8003(a), and in the discretion of the court, a fee of $350 shall be paid to the Referee for the computation of the amount due and uponthefiling of his report and the Referee shall not request or accept additional compensation for the computation unless it has been fixed by the court in accordance with CPLR 8003(b); andit is further ORDEREDthat the Referee is prohibited from accepting or retaining any funds for himself or paying funds to himself without compliance with Part 36 of the Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge; andit is further ORDEREDthatif the Referee holds a hearing, the Referee may seek additional compensation at the Referee’s usual and customary hourly rate; and it is further ORDEREDthatplaintiff shall forward all necessary documents to the Referee and to defendants who have appearedin this case within 30 daysof the date of this order and shall promptly respond to every inquiry made by the referee (promptly means within two business days); and it is further ORDEREDthatif defendant(s) have objections, they must submit them to the referee within 14 days of the mailing ofplaintiff's submissions; and include these objections to the Court if opposing the motion for a judgmentof foreclosure and sale; andit is further ORDEREDthefailure by defendants to submit objections to the referee shall be deemed a waiver of objections before the Court on an application for a judgmentof foreclosure andsale; andit is further ORDEREDthatplaintiff must bring a motion for a judgmentofforeclosure and sale within 30 daysof receipt of the referee’s report; and it is further ORDEREDthatifplaintiff fails to meet these deadlines, then the Court may sua sponte vacate this order and direct plaintiff to move again for an order of reference and the Court may sua sponte toll interest depending on whetherthe delays are due to plaintiff's failure to move this litigation forward; and it further ORDEREDthat counselforplaintiff shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the County Clerk (60 Centre Street, Room 141B) and the General Clerk’s Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119), whoare directed to mark the court’s recordsto reflect the parties being removedpursuant hereto; andit is further ORDEREDthatsuch service upon the County Clerk and the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office shall be madein accordance with the proceduresset forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Proceduresfor Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the “E-Filing” page on the court’s website at the address (www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh)]; andit is further 850127/2021 RL 900 PARK LLC vs. CENTRAL PA Motion No. 002

ORDEREDthatPlaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order with notice of entry onall parties and personsentitled to notice, including the Referee appointed herein.

If a motion has not been made, then a conference is required to explore the reasons for the delay.

Except for defendant 710 Park Avenue Corp., none of the Defaulting Defendants has appeared, answered, or otherwise moved with respect to the Summons and Verified Complaint, and their time to appear, answer or respond has not ...

101 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2022 moving party is nonetheless entitled to judgment as a matter of law (that is, none of the factual disputes are material).

Baccari v. De Santi, 70 A.D.2d 198, 201-02, 431 N.Y.S.2d 829, 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep’t 1979) (holding that a notice of pendency that was filed with the Clerk but was improperly indexed due to a Clerk error was nonetheless void for ...

101 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2022 Moreover, this statute does not provide that a later-filed notice of pendency retroactively constitutes notice to bona fide purchasers who otherwise had none, as RL would have the Court do here.

& LEVER,LLP By John C. Re Attorneys for Plaintiff One North Broadway, White New York Plains, Ph.

that upon the County Clerk Street, Rooni 119), who removed pursuant hereto; counsel shall for plaintiff serve (60 Centre Street, Room 141B) are directed to mark the court's and it is further a copy this order with of notice and the General Office Clerk's records to reflect the parties of entry (60 Centre being

& LEVER,LLP By John C. Re for Plaintiff Attorneys One North Broadway, New York White Plains, Ph.

are directed to mark the court's and it is further serve a copy this of and the General records to reflect order with notice Clerk's Office the parties being of entry (60 Centre

& LEVER,LLP By John C. Re for Plaintiff Attorneys One North Broadway, White New York Plains, Ph.

This Stipulation is being entered into to facilitate the production, exchange and discovery of documents and information that the Parties and, as appropriate, non-parties, agree merit confidential treatment (hereinafter the “Documents” or “Testimony”).

Any deposition witness who is given access to Confidential Information shall, prior thereto, be provided with a copy of this Stipulation and shall execute a written agreement, in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto, to comply with and be bound by its terms.

A Party or, as appropriate, non-party, who seeks to file with the Court (i) any deposition transcripts, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, or other documents which have previously been designated as comprising or containing Confidential Information, or (ii) any pleading, brief or memorandum which reproduces, paraphrases or discloses Confidential Information shall file the document, pleading, brief, or memorandum on the NYSCEF system in redacted form until the Court renders a decision on any motion to seal (the “Redacted Filing”).

to implement and adhere to reasonable procedures to ensure Documents Reviewed that are protected from disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3101(c), 3101(d)(2) and 4503 (“Protected Information”) are identified and withheld from production.

This Stipulation may be changed by further order of this Court, and is without prejudice to the rights of a Party to move for relief from any of its provisions, or to seek or agree to different or additional protection for any particular material or information.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that annexed hereto is a true and correct copy of the Decision & Order of the Honorable Joel M. Cohen, J.S.C., dated February 10, 2022 and entered by the County Clerk of New York County on February 10, 2022.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, were read on this motion to

ORDERED that the unopposed motion by Cole Schotz P.C. (“Cole Schotz”) to withdraw and be relieved as counsel for Defendant Prodigy Shorewood Investment Management, LLC (“PSIM”) is granted; it is further ORDERED that Cole Schotz is to comply with their obligations under Rule 1.16(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as applicable to the facts presented, to “take steps, to the extent reasonably practicable, to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the clients, including giving reasonable notice to the clients, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering to the clients all papers and property to which the clients are entitled, promptly refunding any part of a fee paid in advance that has not been earned and complying with applicable laws and rules”; it is further 656453/2020 STRATEGIC REVIEW COMMITTEE LLC vs. PRODIGY NETWORK, LLC Motion No. 003 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED that Cole Schotz shall promptly serve a copy of this order upon PSIM by email, and, if practicable, by hard copy at their last known home and/or business addresses, respectively, by certified mail, return receipt requested; it is further ORDERED that PSIM shall appoint substitute counsel within 30 days from the date of this order; and it is further ORDERED that no further proceedings may be taken against PSIM1 without leave of this Court until 30 days from the date of this order.

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

1 Defendant Prodigy Network LLC (“Prodigy”) has failed to answer or respond to the Complaint, dated November 20, 2020, or otherwise appear in this action.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, were read on this motion to

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

ORDERED that the unopposed motion by Cole Schotz P.C. (“Cole Schotz”) to withdraw and be relieved as counsel for Defendant Prodigy Shorewood Investment Management, LLC (“PSIM”) is granted; it is further ORDERED that Cole Schotz is to comply with their obligations under Rule 1.16(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as applicable to the facts presented, to “take steps, to the extent reasonably practicable, to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the clients, including giving reasonable notice to the clients, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering to the clients all papers and property to which the clients are entitled, promptly refunding any part of a fee paid in advance that has not been earned and complying with applicable laws and rules”; it is further 656453/2020 STRATEGIC REVIEW COMMITTEE LLC vs. PRODIGY NETWORK, LLC Motion No. 003 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED that Cole Schotz shall promptly serve a copy of this order upon PSIM by email, and, if practicable, by hard copy at their last known home and/or business addresses, respectively, by certified mail, return receipt requested; it is further ORDERED that PSIM shall appoint substitute counsel within 30 days from the date of this order; and it is further ORDERED that no further proceedings may be taken against PSIM1 without leave of this Court until 30 days from the date of this order.

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

1 Defendant Prodigy Network LLC (“Prodigy”) has failed to answer or respond to the Complaint, dated November 20, 2020, or otherwise appear in this action.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, and JOHN DOES 1- 12, the latter names being fictitious but intending to designate tenants and persons in possession or persons having an interest in portions of the premises described in the Complaint herein,

----------------------------------------------------------------------x Mesdames/Sirs: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the attached is a true copy of a Decision + Order on Motion dated February 4, 2022 and duly entered in the office of the Clerk of the above-named Court on February 4, 2022 as NYSCEF Doc. No. 68.

KURZMAN EISENBERG CORBIN & LEVER, LLP By:_________________________________ John C. Re Attorneys for Plaintiff One North Broadway, 12th Floor White Plains, New York 10601 Ph.

TO: Herrick, Feinstein, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Board of Managers of the Park 900 Condominium (via NYSCEF)

Belkin Burden Goldman LLP Attorneys for 710 Park Avenue Corporation (via NYSCEF) James Scott Yoh, Esq. 135-11 40th Road, 5th Floor Flushing, New York 11354