Docket
16-1862,
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
(July 28, 2016)
Civil Rights - Other (Appeals)
Case Type | 3440 Civil Rights - Other |
Tags | 3440 Civil Rights, Other, 3440 Civil Rights, Other |
Plaintiff - Appellant | ALLEN RAY DYER |
Defendant - Appellee | MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION |
Defendant - Appellee | JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT, JR., Member, Maryland State Board of Education |
Cite Docket
Allen Dyer v. MD State Board of Education, 16-1862 (4th Cir.)
+ More Snippets
Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Jun. 24, 2021)
... Cell Phone is a Spy!, Judges’ J., Summer 2020, at 34 (discussing instances of private companies sharing locational data to track users’ movements and noting, “[a]lthough user data are anonymized, users’ identities can nonetheless ...
Cite Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Jun. 24, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600 (4th Cir. May. 13, 2021)
While Goldstein acknowledges this evidence, he counters that it is also insufficient because none of the officers who testified said they interviewed the children.
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600 (4th Cir. May. 13, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 2020)
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL S. HARRISON, in his official capacity as Baltimore Police Commissioner Defendants - Appellees
A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted.
The parties shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days.
This case is tentatively scheduled for oral argument in the next available session.
Cite Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020)
... of criminal activity” at an “extremely low rate.” Id. at 28; see, e.g., id. at 50 (“One African-American man in his mid-fifties was stopped 30 times in less than four years” based only on a suspicion of “‘loitering’ or ‘trespassing’” and “none ...
Cite Document
Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department, 20-1495 (4th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 4 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
The court consolidates Case No. 19-1602 with Case No. 19-1600 (L) as cross appeals.
The appellant in Case No. 19-1600 (L) shall be considered the appellant for purposes of the consolidated appeals and shall proceed first at briefing and at oral argument.
Entry of appearance forms and disclosure statements filed by counsel and parties to the lead case are deemed filed in the secondary case.
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 4 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 4 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
The court consolidates Case No. 19-1602 with Case No. 19-1600 (L) as cross appeals.
The appellant in Case No. 19-1600 (L) shall be considered the appellant for purposes of the consolidated appeals and shall proceed first at briefing and at oral argument.
Entry of appearance forms and disclosure statements filed by counsel and parties to the lead case are deemed filed in the secondary case.
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 4 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 5 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
BAR ADMISSION & ECF REGISTRATION: If you have not been admitted to practice before the Fourth Circuit, you must complete and return an Application for Admission before filing this form.
If you were admitted to practice under a different name than you are now using, you must include your former name when completing this form so that we can locate you on the attorney roll.
Electronic filing by counsel is required in all Fourth Circuit cases.
If you have not registered as a Fourth Circuit ECF Filer, please complete the required steps at Register for eFiling.
THE CLERK WILL ENTER MY APPEARANCE IN APPEAL NO. ______________________________ as [ ]Retained [ ]Court-appointed(CJA) [ ]Court-assigned(non-CJA) [ ]Federal Defender [ ]Pro Bono [ ]Government
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 5 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 1 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
OF BALTIMORE; KELLY MILES, Officer; JOHN BOYD, Officer; JOHN SKINNER, Officer; DEAN PALMERE, Officer; DETECTIVE GERALD ALAN GOLDSTEIN Defendants
This case has been opened on appeal.
Originating Court Originating Case Number Date notice of appeal filed in originating court: Appellant(s) Appellate Case Number Case Manager
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 1 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 1 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
OF BALTIMORE; KELLY MILES, Officer; JOHN BOYD, Officer; JOHN SKINNER, Officer; DEAN PALMERE, Officer; DETECTIVE GERALD ALAN GOLDSTEIN Defendants
This case has been opened on appeal.
Originating Court Originating Case Number Date notice of appeal filed in originating court: Appellant(s) Appellate Case Number Case Manager
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 1 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 2 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
• Counsel must remove from documents filed with this court any social security numbers, juvenile names, dates of birth, financial account numbers, home addresses in criminal cases, and protected information regarding unexecuted summonses, jurors, presentence investigations, statements of reasons in criminal judgments, and substantial assistance agreements.
In immigration and social security cases, public Internet access is limited to the court's docket, orders, and opinions.
Federal Rules of Procedure The federal rules of procedure require filers to redact any of the following personal data identifiers (PDIs) if included in court filings: (1) social security and tax ID numbers must be limited to last four digits; (2) minor children must be identified by their initials only; (3) dates of birth must show the year only; (4) financial account numbers must be limited to the last four digits only; and (5) home addresses in criminal cases must be limited to city and state only.
P. 9037 Judicial Conference Privacy Policy In addition, the judiciary's regulation on Privacy Policy for Electronic Case Files prohibits filers from including any of the following criminal documents in the public file: (1) unexecuted summonses or warrants; (2) bail or presentence reports; (3) statement of reasons in judgment of conviction; (4) juvenile records; (5) identifying information about jurors or potential jurors; (6) CJA financial affidavits; (7) ex parte requests to authorize CJA services and (8) any sealed documents, such as motions for downward departure for substantial assistance, plea agreements indicating cooperation, or victim statements.
• Use the appropriate ECF event (e.g., MOTION or RESPONSE/ANSWER) to file public electronic version of document from which sealed material has been redacted.
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1600, No. 2 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 2 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
• Counsel must remove from documents filed with this court any social security numbers, juvenile names, dates of birth, financial account numbers, home addresses in criminal cases, and protected information regarding unexecuted summonses, jurors, presentence investigations, statements of reasons in criminal judgments, and substantial assistance agreements.
In immigration and social security cases, public Internet access is limited to the court's docket, orders, and opinions.
Federal Rules of Procedure The federal rules of procedure require filers to redact any of the following personal data identifiers (PDIs) if included in court filings: (1) social security and tax ID numbers must be limited to last four digits; (2) minor children must be identified by their initials only; (3) dates of birth must show the year only; (4) financial account numbers must be limited to the last four digits only; and (5) home addresses in criminal cases must be limited to city and state only.
P. 9037 Judicial Conference Privacy Policy In addition, the judiciary's regulation on Privacy Policy for Electronic Case Files prohibits filers from including any of the following criminal documents in the public file: (1) unexecuted summonses or warrants; (2) bail or presentence reports; (3) statement of reasons in judgment of conviction; (4) juvenile records; (5) identifying information about jurors or potential jurors; (6) CJA financial affidavits; (7) ex parte requests to authorize CJA services and (8) any sealed documents, such as motions for downward departure for substantial assistance, plea agreements indicating cooperation, or victim statements.
• Use the appropriate ECF event (e.g., MOTION or RESPONSE/ANSWER) to file public electronic version of document from which sealed material has been redacted.
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 2 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 5 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 19-1602, No. 5 (4th Cir. Jun. 6, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 18-1352 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2019)
Cite Document
Sabein Burgess v. Gerald Goldstein, 18-1352 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Allen Dyer v. MD State Board of Education, 16-1862 (4th Cir. Apr. 21, 2017)
Cite Document
Allen Dyer v. MD State Board of Education, 16-1862 (4th Cir. Apr. 21, 2017)
+ More Snippets
Can’t find
a case you think should be here?
Use our supplemental search tool to find
dockets that you may not see here.

Start a Supplemental Search
Our supplemental search tool searches the government's
database directly, ensuring you get complete results.
Note that for flat-rate users, supplemental search on Federal
Courts costs $0.10/search. Non Federal Courts are free. For
pay-as-you-go members, see
our detailed
pricing page.