• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 69-83 of 8,017 results

Facebook, Inc. et al. v. Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco

Docket A160743, California State Court of Appeals, First District (Aug. 21, 2020)
Division5
Case TypeCV
Petitioner Facebook, Inc.
Petitioner Mark Zuckerberg
Respondent Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Children's Health Defense v. Facebook Inc. et al

Docket 3:20-cv-05787, California Northern District Court (Aug. 17, 2020)
Judge Susan Illston, presiding
Civil Rights - Other
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED
Demand$5,000,000
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags440 Civil Rights, Other, 440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff Children's Health Defense
Defendant Facebook Inc.
Defendant Mark Zuckerberg
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen

Docket 17-3345, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (Oct. 19, 2017)
Petitioner Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security
Petitioner Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Petitioner Donald J. Trump, President of the United States
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

City of Chicago v. Jefferson B. Sessions III

Docket 17-2991, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit (Sept. 26, 2017)
Tags2899, Other, Statutes
Plaintiff - Appellee CITY OF CHICAGO
Defendant - Appellant JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Amicus Curiae STATE OF CALIFORNIA
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Hom...

Docket 1:20-cv-11283, Massachusetts District Court (July 8, 2020)
Judge Allison D. Burroughs, presiding
Administrative Procedure Act
DivisionBoston
FlagsCLOSED
Cause05:702 Administrative Procedure Act
Case Type899 Administrative Procedure Act
Tags899 Administrative Procedure Act, 899 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff President and Fellows of Harvard College
Plaintiff Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

DIALYSIS PATIENT CITIZENS v. AZAR et al

Docket 1:20-cv-01664, District Of Columbia District Court (June 22, 2020)
Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, presiding
Administrative Procedure Act
DivisionWashington, DC
FlagsCLOSED, TYPE-E
Cause05:0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Case Type899 Administrative Procedure Act
Tags899 Administrative Procedure Act, 899 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff DIALYSIS PATIENT CITIZENS
Plaintiff DAVITA INC.
Plaintiff FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC. D/B/A INSTAGRAM

Docket 20-0434, Texas State, Supreme Court (May 29, 2020)
Case TypeMandamus/Cause
Amicus Curiae Washington Legal Foundation
Amicus Curiae Alliance to Counter Online Crime
Amicus Curiae National Center on Sexual Exploitation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 161 PUBLISHED OPINION FILED

Document Tesla v. Louisiana Automobile Dealers, 23-30480, No. 161 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2024)
... to revise its interpretations,” the Commission “has always openly held (and directly stated to LADA) that it would issue a license to Tesla if Tesla met the statutory guidelines.” In fact, it had done just that, approving a motor vehicle 4 None ...
See id. at 1199.19 Finally, LADA advances that none of these due process concerns arises where members of a regulatory scheme “function subordinately” to a governmental actor such that the governmental actor makes the market- 18 ...
Nonetheless, the majority opinion suggests that we need not wait until the Commission commences a proceeding against Tesla, or consider “actual partiality,” to find a due process violation.
Nonetheless, the majority opinion appears to consider arguments Tesla, itself, has not made.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 178 ORDER: In light of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Moody, Att’y Gen. ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 178 (11th Cir. Aug. 16, 2024)
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 David J. Smith Clerk of Court
Appeal Number: 21-12355-GG Case Style: Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al District Court Docket No: 4:21-cv-00220-RH-MAF The enclosed copy of this Court's order of remand is issued as the mandate of this Court.
Counsel is advised that with this order of remand this appeal is concluded.
If further review is to be sought in the future a timely new notice of appeal must be filed.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Opinion by Judge MILLER (Civil)

Document Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al, 21-16210 (9th Cir. Aug. 9, 2024)
We review the district court’s assessment of the adequacy of service for abuse of discretion, and we find none.
On its face, this system extended to truthful speech that the “whitelisted” Government officials nonetheless deemed to promote “Vaccine Discouragement.” It is also important to note that all of these actions took place against a backdrop ...
12 Of course, to the extent that CHD were to establish an ultimate entitlement to injunctive relief, Zuckerberg, the Poynter Institute, and others working in concert with Meta might nonetheless be incidentally covered by an injunction ...
C None of the additional contentions raised by the majority or by Defendants supports a contrary view with respect to the state-action issue.
That calls, as in Skinner, for a more tailored inquiry into whether, in light of those unique circumstances, state action is nonetheless present.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 172 Judgment of U.S. Supreme Court received as to Appellant Attorney General, State of Florida. ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 172 (11th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024)
Motion for Judgment
Sincerely, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk By M. Altner Assistant Clerk – Judgments All counsel of record Enc.
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 172 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 3 of 3 Supreme Court of the United States No. 22–277
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the above court and was argued by counsel.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioners, Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., recover from NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al., Three Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-three Dollars and Eight Cents ($3,473.08) for costs herein expended.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 136 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, MARK J. BENNETT and ROOPALI H. DESAI) The supplemental briefs referenced ...

Document Donald Trump, et al v. Twitter, Inc., et al, 22-15961, No. 136 (9th Cir. Jul. 30, 2024)
Case: 22-15961, 07/30/2024, ID: 12899486, DktEntry: 136, Page 1 of 1
The supplemental briefs referenced in this Court’s order dated July 3, 2024 (Dkt. No. 135), shall be no longer than twenty-five pages or 7,000 words.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 135 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, MARK J. BENNETT and ROOPALI H. DESAI) The parties are ordered to ...

Document Donald Trump, et al v. Twitter, Inc., et al, 22-15961, No. 135 (9th Cir. Jul. 3, 2024)
Case: 22-15961, 07/03/2024, ID: 12895069, DktEntry: 135, Page 1 of 2
The parties are ordered to submit supplemental briefs addressing the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in the following cases: Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, No. 22-277 (U.S. July 1, 2024); NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, No. 22-555 (U.S. July 1, 2024); Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23–411 (U.S. June 26, 2024); and National
Case: 22-15961, 07/03/2024, ID: 12895069, DktEntry: 135, Page 2 of 2 Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 (U.S. May 30, 2024).
These supplemental briefs shall be submitted no later than 30 days after entry of this order.
Briefing shall be simultaneous.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 170

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 170 (11th Cir. Jul. 1, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 72

Document Danelle Sinclair, et al v. Twitter, Inc., et al, 19-15625, No. 72 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... >>