• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 2,814 results

USA v. Bergstein

Docket 1:16-cr-00746, New York Southern District Court (Nov. 7, 2016)
Judge P. Kevin Castel, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF
Defendant David Bergstein
Defendant Keith Wellner
Interested Party Weston Capital Partners Master Fund II and Karen Balmer (as director)
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1980 JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL as to Joye Vaught: IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to ...

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1980 (D.Ariz. Nov. 17, 2023)
Motion for Judgment
United States of America,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Counts 1-51 of the Superseding Indictment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby acquitted and discharged pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Dated this 16th day of November, 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1979 JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL as to Andrew Padilla: IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled ...

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1979 (D.Ariz. Nov. 17, 2023)
Motion for Judgment
United States of America,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Counts 1-51 of the Superseding Indictment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby acquitted and discharged pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Dated this 16th day of November, 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1976

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1976 (D.Ariz. Nov. 17, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 2000 MINUTE ORDER re: Certification of Trial Exhibits as to Michael Lacey, Scott Spear, John Brunst, ...

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2000 (D.Ariz. Nov. 16, 2023)
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1971

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1971 (D.Ariz. Nov. 14, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1958

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1958 (D.Ariz. Nov. 9, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1949

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1949 (D.Ariz. Nov. 8, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1937

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1937 (D.Ariz. Nov. 2, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1934

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1934 (D.Ariz. Nov. 1, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1926

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1926 (D.Ariz. Oct. 31, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1914

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1914 (D.Ariz. Oct. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 57

Document In Re: Heartwise, Inc., 8:22-cv-00997, No. 57 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 26, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1911

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1911 (D.Ariz. Oct. 25, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1881

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 1881 (D.Ariz. Oct. 20, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>