• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 99-113 of 6,999 results

No. 1187 ORDER re 1182 Memorandum - Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Response to Parties' Motions to ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1187 (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2024)
Motion to Seal
None of that information refers to Index's "take rate" or other actual confidential business infonnation that would justify it remaining under seal.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 598 ORDER granting 594 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages

Document The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC, 4:20-cv-00957, No. 598 (E.D.Tex. Aug. 9, 2024)
Motion to FileGranted
After full consideration of the motion, Google’s response, (Dkt. #595), and the applicable rules, the Court determines that both parties shall be granted excess pages.
Although the Court’s initial order appointing the Special Master did not specify whether challenges to an order issued by the Special Master are governed by Local Rule CV-72(b) or by standard page limitations for motions set out in Local Rule CV-7(a)(2),(Dkt. #213), the Court later clarified that such motions are subject to Local Rule CV-72 and thus limited to five pages.
The Court recognizes that, given the subject matter of the Special Master’s orders, it may be appropriate in some instances to allow the parties to file lengthier briefs.
The Court concludes that the Special Master Order at issue, (Dkt. #558), merits additional pages of briefing from the parties.
Google’s Motion for Review of the Special Master’s July 15, 2024 Order, (Dkt. #585), is deemed properly filed.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1145 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema: Motion Hearing ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1145 (E.D.Va. Aug. 9, 2024)
Appearances of Counsel for: [ [ X ] Plaintiff: Julia Wood, Gerard Mene, Aaron Teitelbaum, Sean Carman [ X ] Defendant: Craig Reilly, Karen Dunn, Bradley Justus, Bryon Becker, Allison Vissichelli [ X ] Interested Party (Bloomberg L.P., MLex US Inc., Portfolio Media Inc., The New York Times Company, The Washington Post): Laurin Mills, Matthew Leish [ 1111 ] MOTION for modification/clarification of access procedures by Bloomberg L.P., Re: MLex US Inc., Portfolio Media Inc., The New York Times Company, The Washington Post.
[ X ] The Court advises the parties about the following trial procedures: • Counsel should upload exhibits that were admitted at trial by 10:00 am the following morning • Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law should be filed on the public docket in a redacted format and a sealed version should also be filed for the Court's review • The parties tech personnel to contact Court IT • Media DENIED use of personal electronics • No live zoom streaming of opening and closing arguments • Plaintiffs’ counsel permitted to sit in jury box – counsel to advise Chambers of approx.
head count • Burden on the parties to make appropriate redactions to all exhibits and deposition designations X ] Order to Follow
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1135 ORDER granting 1133 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Jessica E. Phillips for Google LLC

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1135 (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
I certify that the rules of the federal court in the district in which | maintain my office extend a similarpro hac vice admission privilege to members ofthe bar of the Eastern District of Virginia.
1am [7] am not[ila full-time employee of the United States of America, and ifso, request exemption from the admission fee.
I affirm that his/her personal and professional character and standing are good, and petition the court to admit the applicant pro hae vice.
fAbn (Signature) Bryon P. Becker (Typed or Printed Name) 08/06/2024 (Date) 93384 (VA Bar Number) Court Use Only:
The motion for admission is GRANTED[¥]or DENIED [7] Isl Leonie M. Brinkema United States District Judge Nacnol 1 2024 (Date)
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1124 ORDER granting 1105 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Matthew Leish for Bloomberg L.P.,Matthew ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1124 (E.D.Va. Aug. 5, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
Name(s) of federal district court(s) in which I have been admitted S.D.N.Y., E.D.N.Y, W.D.N.Y., M.D.FL I certify that the rules ofthe federal court in the district in which I maintain my office extend a similar pro hac vice admission privilege to membersofthe bar ofthe Eastern District of Virginia.
I hereby certify that, within ninety (90) days before the submissionofthis application, I have read the Loca!
I am (] am not[iia full-time employee ofthe United States ofAmerica, and if so, req
1, the undersigned, do certify that I am a member ofthe bar ofthis Court, not related to the applicant; that I know the applicant personally, that the said applicant possesses all of the qualifications required for admission to the bar of this Court; that I have examined the applicant’s personal statement.
I affirm that his/her personaland professional character and standing are good, and petition the court to admit the applicant pro hac vice.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1080 ORDER granting 935 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Karen Hoffman Lent for Mars, Inc

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1080 (E.D.Va. Jul. 31, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
Case 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA Document 1080 Filed 07/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 79947
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1087 ORDER granting 1067 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1087 (E.D.Va. Jul. 31, 2024)
Motion to Withdraw as CounselGranted
Defendant.
Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1, the Court hereby:
GRANTS Jan Michael Zavislan’s Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for the State of Colorado; andit is further ORDEREDthat the Clerk of the Court shall strike his appearance and remove him from the CM/ECFservicelist in this matter; andit is further ORDEREDthatthe parties need not serve any further pleadings, motions, or other papers on Jan Michael Zavislan in this matter.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1083 ORDER granting 998 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Peter Joseph Mucchetti for Adobe, Inc

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1083 (E.D.Va. Jul. 31, 2024)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
In Case Number1:23-cv-0108-LMB-JFA Case Name United States,et al. v. Google LLC Party Represented by Applicant: Adobe, inc. To: The Honorable Judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
I have not been reprimanded in any court nor has there been any action in any court pertaining to my conductorfitness as a memberofthe bar.
I herebycertify that, within ninety (90) days before the submission ofthis application, I have read the Local Rules ofthis Court and that my knowledgeof the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence is current.
I am (J am not[Mia full-time employeeof the United States ofAmerica, and if so, request exemption from the admissionfee.
Peter J. Mucchettl (Applicant’s Signature) 1 Blatakena8achFoe I, the undersigned,do certify that I am a memberofthe barof this Court, not related to the applicant; that | know the applicant personally,that the said applicant possessesall of the qualifications required for admission to the bar ofthis Court; that I have examined the applicant’s personal statement.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 586 ORDER granting 584 Motion to File Under Seal

Document The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC, 4:20-cv-00957, No. 586 (E.D.Tex. Jul. 30, 2024)
Motion to FileGranted
Before the Court is Google LLC’s Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal.
Google requests leave to file its Motion for Review of the Special Master’s July 15, 2024 Order, (Dkt. #585), under seal.
The Court has reviewed the motion and finds that the document contains confidential information such that there is good cause to file it under seal.
Binh Hoa Le v. Exeter Fin.
It is therefore ORDERED that Google’s Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal, (Dkt. #584), is GRANTED.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1071 Ordered that within seven days defendant shall file in the public recordan unredacted version ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1071 (E.D.Va. Jul. 30, 2024)
The memorandum in support of this omnibus motion to seal includes appendix A in which defendant states it provides the basis for "the material it is requesting remain under seal" and information that plaintiffs or non-parties have designated as confidential.
Given defendant's approach in combining several separate replies in a single motion to seal, the court will be addressing portions of this motion to seal in individual orders relating to the specific replies.
Since only a portion of the combined set of exhibits appears to relate to the reply in support of the motion to exclude testimony from Mr. Lee, the court will issue a separate order that resolves the portion of the motion to seal relating to the combined set of exhibits once the redactions for the four separate replies are addressed.
The reply in support of the motion to exclude testimony from Robin Lee filed in the public record includes redactions on pages 1, 2, 4-10, 14, and 17-19.
No non-party has made a specific response requesting that any information in the reply remain under seal.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1072 Ordered that within seven days defendant shall file in the public record an unredacted version ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 1072 (E.D.Va. Jul. 30, 2024)
... the non-parties and reviewing the redacted information in the memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment, the court finds that Case 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA Document 1072 Filed 07/30/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 79935 none ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 582 ORDER

Document The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC, 4:20-cv-00957, No. 582 (E.D.Tex. Jul. 26, 2024)
On June 14, 2024, Defendant Google LLC filed its Notice Regarding Inconsistent Positions by State of Texas.
It does not appear that the State of Texas has responded to the notice.
It is therefore ORDERED that the State of Texas shall file a response to Defendant Google LLC’s Notice Regarding Inconsistent Positions by State of Texas, (Dkt. #527), no later than Monday, August 5, 2024.
The response should be no longer than five pages, exclusive of exhibits.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 583 ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 571 Google's Second Corrected Motion to Clarify the Court's ...

Document The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC, 4:20-cv-00957, No. 583 (E.D.Tex. Jul. 26, 2024)
The Court has received Google’s Second Corrected “Motion to Clarify” the
Court’s Scheduling Order to Provide for Potential Post-Trial Proceedings on Injunctive Relief.
The Court will hold a hearing on this motion.
It is therefore ORDERED that a hearing is set for Tuesday, July 30, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., at the United States Courthouse, Courtroom 105, 7940 Preston Road, Plano, TX 75024.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 930 ORDERED that within seven days defendant shall file in the public record an unredacted version ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 930 (E.D.Va. Jul. 25, 2024)
764, 776, 111, 790, 814, 837, 840), none of those responses address the redactions in this reply.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 931 Ordered that within seven days plaintiffs shall file in the public record an unredacted version ...

Document United States et al v. Google LLC, 1:23-cv-00108, No. 931 (E.D.Va. Jul. 25, 2024)
Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and considering the Fourth Circuit's directives, the court finds 1.
That the motion to seal the memorandum in support of motion to exclude opinions of Itamar Simonson and related opinions of Mark Israel is denied and an unredacted version of that memorandum shall be filed in the public record.
In accordance with this Order, within seven days plaintiffs shall file in the public record an unredacted version of the memorandum in support of motion to exclude opinions of Itamar Simonson and related opinions of Mark Israel with unredacted versions of exhibits A, B, I, J, M, and O.
' This ruling is subject to reconsideration by the District Judge if the information allowed to remain under seal at this time is intended to be used during the trial of this case.
As set forth in the court's June 24, 2024 Order (Docket no. 871), a hearing may be held before the District Judge on August 9, to address any objections to the public use of confidential documents or testimony designations during trial.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... >>