A further Case Management Conference has been scheduled for the above entitled case, and you are directed to appear in court on: Date: February 08, 2024 Time: 9:00 AM Dept.

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I declare under penalty of perjury that I served this notice by enclosing a true copy in a sealed envelope, addressed to each person whose name is shown below, and by depositing the envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the U.S. Mail at San Jose, CA on October 31, 2023.

CLERK OF THE COURT, by Thomas Duarte, Deputy.

cc: Jaskiran Kaur 611 Gateway BLVD STE 233 South San Francico CA 94080 Amos Alexander Lowder Larson LLP 555 South Flower Street Suite 4400 Los Angeles CA 90071 David William Baumgarten 1450 Frazee Rd Ste 403 San Diego CA 92108 David Bruce Burnett Resnick & Louis PC 9891 Irvine Center Dr Suite 200 IRVINE CA 92618 Sarah G Flanagan Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco CA 94111

A further Case Management Conference has been scheduled for the above entitled case, and you are directed to appear in court on: Date: February 08, 2024 Time: 9:00 AM Dept.

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I declare under penalty of perjury that I served this notice by enclosing a true copy in a sealed envelope, addressed to each person whose name is shown below, and by depositing the envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the U.S. Mail at San Jose, CA on October 31, 2023.

CLERK OF THE COURT, by Thomas Duarte, Deputy.

cc: Jaskiran Kaur 611 Gateway BLVD STE 233 South San Francico CA 94080 Alison McNaboe Crane BLEDSOE DIESTEL TREPPA & CRANE LLP 180 Sansome Street 5th Floor San Francisco CA 94104 David William Baumgarten 1450 Frazee Rd Ste 403 San Diego CA 92108 David Bruce Burnett Resnick & Louis PC 9891 Irvine Center Dr Suite 200 IRVINE CA 92618 Sarah G Flanagan Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco CA 94111

A further Case Management Conference has been scheduled for the above entitled case, and you are directed to appear in court on: Date: February 08, 2024 Time: 9:00 AM Dept.

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I declare under penalty of perjury that I served this notice by enclosing a true copy in a sealed envelope, addressed to each person whose name is shown below, and by depositing the envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the U.S. Mail at San Jose, CA on October 31, 2023.

CLERK OF THE COURT, by Thomas Duarte, Deputy.

cc: Amos Alexander Lowder Larson LLP 555 South Flower Street Suite 4400 Los Angeles CA 90071 Alison McNaboe Crane BLEDSOE DIESTEL TREPPA & CRANE LLP 180 Sansome Street 5th Floor San Francisco CA 94104 David William Baumgarten 1450 Frazee Rd Ste 403 San Diego CA 92108 David Bruce Burnett Resnick & Louis PC 9891 Irvine Center Dr Suite 200 IRVINE CA 92618 Sarah G Flanagan Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco CA 94111

A further Case Management Conference has been scheduled for the above entitled case, and you are directed to appear in court on: Date: February 08, 2024 Time: 9:00 AM Dept.

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I declare under penalty of perjury that I served this notice by enclosing a true copy in a sealed envelope, addressed to each person whose name is shown below, and by depositing the envelope with postage fully prepaid, in the U.S. Mail at San Jose, CA on October 31, 2023.

CLERK OF THE COURT, by Thomas Duarte, Deputy.

cc: Jaskiran Kaur 611 Gateway BLVD STE 233 South San Francico CA 94080 Amos Alexander Lowder Larson LLP 555 South Flower Street Suite 4400 Los Angeles CA 90071 Alison McNaboe Crane BLEDSOE DIESTEL TREPPA & CRANE LLP 180 Sansome Street 5th Floor San Francisco CA 94104 David Bruce Burnett Resnick & Louis PC 9891 Irvine Center Dr Suite 200 IRVINE CA 92618 Sarah G Flanagan Four Embarcadero Center 22nd Floor San Francisco CA 94111

When faced with a similar argument, the Coe court pointed to the “well-established principle that statements of coconspirators before a defendant joins the conspiracy are nonetheless admissible against him.” 718 F.2d at 839; see also ...

On March 1, 2021, Claimants filed their complaints in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (the “Superior Court”), asserting claims against Petitioners and other defendants.

Specifically, Claimants filed an action against the U.S. Coast Guard under the Suits in Admiralty Act (“SIAA”), entitled Nancy Fiedler, et al. v. United States of America, Case No. 2:21-CV-07065 PA (MRWx).

During this status conference, the Court addressed the scheduling of the anticipated pleading challenges to the Third Amended Master Complaint as well as the exchange of discovery to date.

During this status conference, the Court made various rulings, including granting the Motion to Quash filed by Murata Manufacturing Co. on the grounds that this defendant had not yet been properly served pursuant to the Hague Convention, and continuing the hearing on the Motions to Quash filed by LG Energy Solution of Michigan, Inc. and EVE Energy North America Corporation.

1 I have been advised by Attorney Douglas DiSandro, Jr. of Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett and Bendesky PC that he is authorized to consent to its filing on behalf of all Claimants.

Plaintiff, [Filed concurrently with Stipulation to Modify Record Pursuant to FRAP

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government’s demonstrative PowerPoint slides that were utilized during its opening statement and closing argument shall be made a part of the trial court record.

Date: 01/09/2025 Superior Court of California County of Kern Bakersfield Department H

By Order of the Presiding Judge, matter is re-assigned to the Honorable Judge Gregory Pulskamp for all purposes and to be managed in Division J located at 1215 Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301.

Case Management Conference scheduled for March 18, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. in Division H is hereby reset to March 18, 2025 at 8:30 a.m in Division J before the Honorable Judge Gregory Pulskamp.

Copy of minute order served on all parties as stated on the attached certificate of service.

March 18, 2025 8:30 AM Case Management Conference Bakersfield Division J Sheriff, Deputy Pulskamp, Gregory

She is the youngest sister of Eitan Weiner, a college student who died of an accidental fentanyl overdose inside the Theta Delta Chi fraternity house on Stanford University's campus.

DILL-DE SA's MOTION TO COMPEL, ETC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 obtaining…privacy.” See also Cross v. Superior Court (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 305, 325 (internal citation omitted) (explaining that “[t]he question of whether patients have a state constitutional right to privacy that protects the information contained in their medical records is, in our view, an easy one.

Unlike the general population, student athletes undergo frequent physical examination, reveal their bodily and medical conditions to coaches and trainers, and often dress and undress in same-sex locker rooms.

Co. v. Superior Court (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 554, 560 (holding “that plaintiff’s filing of an action to recover on the fire insurance policy operated to waive his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination with reference to any factual issues, particularly as to the applicability of the arson exclusion, tendered by the complaint.

As noted above, Defendant Dill-De Sa has not met the threshold burden of showing why non-party N.W.’s constitutional right to privacy in her psychiatric records should yield in the face of nothing more than vague and general claims that the information contained therein is necessary for trial preparation.

corn YALE & BAUMGARTEN, LLP 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 308 San Diego, California 92108 Tel.

Pursuant to Rule 9.40 ofthe California Rules of Court, I, Louize Fiore, Esq., submit this Verified Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this action on behalf of Plaintiffs Amir Weiner, Julia Erwin-Weiner, and Ya'el Weiner.

The attorney ofrecord for Plaintiffs Amir Weiner, Julia Erwin-Weiner, and Ya'el Weiner, oOCOsD is David W. Baumgarten, an active member ofthe State Bar of California, and a partnerin the law firm ofYale & Baumgarten, LLP, 1450 Frazee Road, San Diego, California 92108, tel.

The matters stated in the foregoing Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice are true of based on information andbelief.

3, Uponreceipt of a hearing date from the court, I will upload a copy ofthis Application and supporting documents to the California State Bar through the ApplicantPortal and cause the $500.00 filing fee to be paid.

AGARWAL, and BRAD PURDY

Case No. 19 CR 864 Hon.

Thomas M. Durkin United States District Judge

Defendant Shradha Agarwal respectfully joins defendant Shah's Motion to Exclude Evidence and for Related Relief (Doc. 688) and his Motion to Continue Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 690).

Respectfully submitted,

Defendant Rishi Shah respectfully moves this Court to (1) exclude evidence relating to the Government’s recent reversal of position on the traceability of certain assets that the Government had previously conceded were not traceable to criminal proceeds and (2) preclude the Government from shifting its position on that issue at this late stage of the litigation on Mr. Shah’s Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for a New Trial (Doc. #490).

On June 26, 2023, Mr. Shah filed a motion to amend this Court’s protective order (Doc. #474) to release millions of dollars in assets that he claimed had been improperly restrained as a result of an overly broad forfeiture allegation in the Superseding Indictment (Doc. #12).

In the intervening weeks, the Government and Mr. Shah worked together to obtain records via subpoena from numerous entities prior to the hearing relating to the value and liquidity of various investments that had previously been restrained by the Protective Order (Doc. #27).

In the days that followed, the undersigned corresponded with Mr. Johnston to further ascertain the basis for the Government’s reversal of position as part of his assessment of the potential conflict issues.

• Permitting the Government to reverse its position now—after Mr. Shah has detrimentally relied on its concessions in litigating the Motion and his case in general—would cause unfair prejudice to Mr. Shah and violate a number of well- established doctrines designed to promote the fairness and predictability of judicial proceedings, including waiver, forfeiture, law of the case, judicial and equitable estoppel, and Due Process itself.

I, Darla M. Gilliard, the undersigned, hereby declare as follows: I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within cause.

I am employed by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP in the County of San Francisco, State of California.

On November 20, 2024, at Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111- 5998, I served a true copy of the attached document(s) titled exactly:

Weiner, et al. v. Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara Case No. 21CV391881 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS AMIR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SERVICE LIST (cont’d) Weiner, et al. v. Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara Case No. 21CV391881 David B. Burnett, Esq. Elyse Pleau, Esq.

... been duly adopred and the initial directors, president, treasurer and clerk or other presiding, financial or recording officers, whose names are set out oo the following page, have been duly elected. there are noprovisions, state "None".

Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, on 11/1/2024 4:41 PM Reviewed By: C. Roman Case #21CV391881 Envelope: 17174374

 by electronically serving the above-referenced document(s) via e-mail to the person(s) listed below, pursuant to the written consent of all parties to accept service by e-mail.

• See Attached Service List I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

LLP 180 Sansome Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-3713 David B. Burnett

Kevin J. Hermanson Chandrani Mandal Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 2185 North California Boulevard, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596