• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 24-38 of 943 results

Todd Purdin, et al.

Docket LC2018-000199, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (May 16, 2018)
Kiley, Daniel, presiding
Case TypeLower Court Appeals
TagsLower Court Appeal, Appeal
PET/Appellant Todd Purdin
RES/Appellee Arizona Department Of Transportation
RES/Appellee John S Halikowski
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Lacey et al

Docket 2:18-cr-00422, Arizona District Court (Mar. 28, 2018)
Judge Diane J Humetewa, presiding
04/06/2018
04/06/2018 19 ORDER Setting Conditions of Release as to Joye Vaught. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 4/6/18. (cc: None - Copies provided to all parties on 4/6/18 by mrh) (M...

Order - Grant - extension of time

Document KELLY CORNELL f/k/a KELLY CORNELL MECARTNEY v. DAVID LAURENCE MECARTNEY, S-25-0013, 164086 (Wyo. Feb. 21, 2025)
KELLY CORNELL f/k/a KELLY
DATED this 21st day of February, 2025.
This matter having come before the court upon Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file Appellant's brief, and good cause having been shown, it is ORDERED that Appellant shall have to and including April 11, 2025, in which to file Appellant's brief.
cite Cite Document

No. 2294 ORDER denying 2270 Motion for Reconsideration as to Michael Lacey (1)

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2294 (D.Ariz. Jan. 3, 2025)
Motion for ReconsiderationDenied
First, as recognized by the Defendant, both parties were given an opportunity to inform the Court of their respective proposed release conditions.
After considering the parties’ respective positions, the Court orally pronounced that pending his appeal, Defendant Lacey be placed on a curfew, and specified that “during the daytime hours he can engage in community services, church services, meeting with his counsel, health, mental health appointments and so on, but that during the evening hours I would suggest from 10:00 to at least 6:00 a.m. he is to be confined to his residence.” (Doc. 2269 at 13).
And that dependent on the mental health assessment, that he participate in a mental health treatment program as directed by his reviewing officer.” (Id.) In imposing these and the other related release conditions, including assessment for alcohol and/or substance use and firearms prohibitions, the Court considered the Defendant’s conviction, his pending retrial, and information gathered in the presentence report as to his mental, physical, and financial health.
Third, generally, the Court “will ordinarily deny a motion for consideration of an Order absent a showing of manifest error or a showing of new facts or legal authority that could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” See LRCiv 7.2.
Rather, he states that “[h]ad counsel understood that the Court intended to deprive Mr. Lacey of the ability to leave his home ... he would have, at the very least, made a record about why that condition has no support in the record.” (Doc. 2270 at 6).
cite Cite Document

No. 2216 ORDER as to Scott Spear construing 2211 Emergency Motion as a Motion for Temporary Restraining ...

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2216 (D.Ariz. Sep. 28, 2024)
Before the Court is Defendant Spear’s Emergency Motion to Provide Necessary Medical and Psychiatric Care (Doc. 2211).
Several of these declarants state that they believe Defendant Spear is suffering from a psychotic break due to his lack of medication.
(Id.) The Motion also states that without his medication, Defendant Spear is at risk of seizures.
Defendant-Appellant Spear’s Motion raises substantially important issues about whether he has been deprived of his doctor’s prescribed medications resulting in psychological injuries that may increase if not immediately addressed; 3.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a hearing on this matter at 4:00 p.m. Monday, September 30, 2024 in Courtroom 605, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85041.
cite Cite Document

Mark Brnovich, et al. v. Insys Therapeutics Inc, et al.

Docket CV2017-012008, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (Aug. 30, 2017)
Warner, Randall, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

State Of Arizona v. Julie Kendall

Docket CR2017-002547, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (July 24, 2017)

cite Cite Docket

North Mesa Plaza V Inc Vs. Fat Willys University L

Docket CV2017-003867, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (April 26, 2017)
Brodman, Roger, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

No. 2063

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2063 (D.Ariz. Apr. 23, 2024)

cite Cite Document

State Of Arizona v. Stefani Jill Martinez

Docket CR2017-115022, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (April 4, 2017)

cite Cite Docket

156683

Document STEPHANIE KAY TATE v. JOEL THOMAS TATE, S-23-0295, 156683 (Wyo. Mar. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document

State Of Arizona Vs.

Docket CV2017-001705, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (Feb. 27, 2017)
Smith, James, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

No. 2042

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2042 (D.Ariz. Feb. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 2034

Document USA v. Lacey et al, 2:18-cr-00422, No. 2034 (D.Ariz. Jan. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document

Ross Dress For Less Inc v. Mattress & Furniture 4 Less L L C

Docket CV2016-053539, Arizona State, Maricopa County, Superior Court (Dec. 22, 2016)
Popham, Jr, Gary, presiding.

cite Cite Docket
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>