Docket
RG20070283,
California State, Alameda County, Superior Court
(Aug. 5, 2020)
Case Type | General Civil - Other Employment - Civil |
Tags | General Civil, Other, Employment, Civil |
| |
| |
| |
Cite Docket
Garcia-Brower VS Lyft, Inc, RG20070283 (California State, Alameda County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
RG19037264,
California State, Alameda County, Superior Court
(Sept. 30, 2019)
Somnath Raj Chatterjee, presiding
Division | Rene C. Davidson Courthouse / DEPT 16 |
Case Type | Civil Unlimited, Other Complaint non-tort/non... |
Tags | Civil Unlimited, Other, Complaint, Non... |
Deadline | Description: Compliance Hearing Re: PHV Renewal Status of CHRISTOPHER A. HOFFMANDept: RCD / Department 16Type: Future Hearing |
Deadline | Description: Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs filed by Alexander Sorokunov (Plaintiff)Dept: RCD / Department 16Type: Future Hearing |
Plaintiff, Appellant | Alexander Sorokunov |
Non-Party | Labor and Workforce Development Agency |
Defendant, Respondent | NETAPP, Inc. |
Cite Docket
Sorokunov VS NETAPP, Inc., RG19037264 (California State, Alameda County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
A158531,
California State Court of Appeals, First District
(Sept. 30, 2019)
Teri L. Jackson, Carin T. Fujisaki, presiding
Division | 3 |
Case Type | CV |
Plaintiff - Respondent | Ming-Hsiang Kao |
Defendant - Appellant | Joy Holiday |
Defendant - Appellant | Jessy Lin |
Cite Docket
Kao v. Holiday et al., A158531 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
A157886,
California State Court of Appeals, First District
(July 19, 2019)
Teri L. Jackson, Carin T. Fujisaki, presiding
Division | 3 |
Case Type | CV |
Plaintiff - Respondent | Ming-Hsiang Kao |
Defendant - Appellant | Joy Holiday |
Defendant - Appellant | Jessy Lin |
Cite Docket
Kao v. Holiday et al., A157886 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
D075479,
California State Court of Appeals, Fourth District
(Jan. 23, 2019)
Cynthia G. Aaron, Joan K. Irion, Terry B. Rourke, presiding
Case Type | CV |
Plaintiff - Respondent | Justine Cruz |
Defendant - Appellant | Fusion Buffet, Inc. |
Defendant - Appellant | Xiao Yan Chen |
Cite Docket
Cruz v. Fusion Buffet, Inc. et al., D075479 (Cal. Ct. App., 4th Dist.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
A155155,
California State Court of Appeals, First District
(Aug. 3, 2018)
Barbara J. Jones, Gordon B. Burns, presiding
Division | 5 |
Case Type | CV |
Plaintiff - Appellant | Tina Huang |
Defendant - Respondent | Twitter, Inc. |
Cite Docket
Huang v. Twitter, Inc., A155155 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
3:18-cv-04176,
California Northern District Court
(July 12, 2018)
Judge William Alsup, presiding, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu (Settlement)
Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act
Division | San Francisco |
Flags | ADRMOP, REFSET-DMR, STAYED |
Cause | 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Case Type | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
Tags | 710 Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act, 710 Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff | James Karl |
Defendant | Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. |
Defendant | Zimmer US, Inc. |
Cite Docket
Karl v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al, 3:18-cv-04176 (N.D.Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
3:18-cv-02967,
California Northern District Court
(May 18, 2018)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Labor - Other
Division | San Francisco |
Flags | ADRMOP, PRVADR |
Demand | Both |
Cause | 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Case Type | 790 Labor - Other |
Tags | 790 Labor, Other, 790 Labor, Other |
Plaintiff | Vincent Pivirotto |
Defendant | Les Concierges, Inc. |
Defendant | Service Concierge SAS dba John Paul |
Cite Docket
Vincent Pivirotto v. Les Concierges, Inc. et al, 3:18-cv-02967 (N.D.Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
CGC-18-564734,
California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court
(Mar. 2, 2018)
Case Type | OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS |
Plaintiff | Bender Roxanne |
Defendant | Doe |
Defendant | Does |
Cite Docket
WALTER FLORES VS. SCRIPTDASH DBA ALTO PHARMACY ET AL, CGC-18-564734 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
CGC-18-564456,
California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court
(Feb. 20, 2018)
Case Type | PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED |
Tags | Personal Injury / Property Damage, Personal Injury, Tort, Civil |
Defendant | Does |
Defendant | John Paul Usa, Formerly Known as Les Concierge |
Defendant | Lesconcierges Inc. |
Cite Docket
VINCENT PIVIROTTO VS. LESCONCIERGES, INC. ET AL, CGC-18-564456 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
SCV-261262,
California State, Sonoma County, Superior Court
(Sept. 12, 2017)
Arthur A Wick, Patrick Broderick, presiding
Division | Civil |
Case Type | 15: Unlimited Other Employment |
Tags | 15, Unlimited, Other, Employment |
Plaintiff | Katelynn Tanner |
Defendant | Brabetz Inc |
Cite Docket
Tanner vs Brabetz Inc, SCV-261262 (California State, Sonoma County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
5:17-cv-02794,
California Northern District Court
(May 15, 2017)
Howard R. Lloyd, presiding, Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi
Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act
Division | San Jose |
Cause | 15:5(a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
Case Type | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
Tags | 710 Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act, 710 Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Stephanie Prasad |
| Pinnacle Management Services Company, LLC |
| |
Cite Docket
Stephanie Prasad v. Pinnacle Management Services Company, LLC et al, 5:17-cv-02794 (N.D.Cal.)
+ More Snippets
Document
Abdelmuti v. El Centro Regional Medical Center, D081505, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 4th Dist. Apr. 24, 2024)
2 1 Abdelmuti as an hourly, nonexempt phlebotomist from approximately June 2020 to April 2021, at Center’s El Centro location.
) It did so in the context of reviewing a judgment on an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend in favor of the defendant city on a class action alleging the city paid plaintiffs— nonexempt hourly employees—less than the legally ...
... unlike the defendant in Marquez, the Regents was not a charter city or any type of entity listed in Wage Order No. 4-2001, and the plaintiff did not include allegations in her complaint that the Regents set the hourly rate for any nonexempt ...
) None of these cases compel us to reject Abdelmuti’s allegations that Center failed to pay minimum wages for hours worked.
Cite Document
Abdelmuti v. El Centro Regional Medical Center, D081505, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 4th Dist. Apr. 24, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Garcia-Brower et al. v. ALCO HARVESTING LLC et al.,, B327137, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 2nd Dist. Nov. 22, 2023)
The trial court consolidated the cases for all purposes at the request of the Labor Commissioner.2 Alco moved to compel arbitration of Guzman’s claims pursuant to a written agreement he and other workers signed in Mexico during their orientation.
It noted Alco had not listed mandatory arbitration as one of the material terms of employment when it sought DOL certification to hire Guzman and other temporary workers under the H-2A program.
Orders so posted are called “Clearance Orders.” Employers must try to recruit from the domestic labor market and hire any “qualified, eligible U.S. worker who applies ... until 50 percent of the period of the work contract has elapsed.” (Id., § 655.135(c), (d).)
The Job Orders submitted to DOL have lengthy addenda describing such things as work experience and physical requirements, the grounds for terminating a worker, training and production standards, and reimbursement of transportation costs.
California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc., Corrie L. Meals, Sandra Aguila, Ana Vicente de Castro, and Dennise Silva; Dawson Morton for Plaintiff and Respondent Jesus Guzman.
Cite Document
Garcia-Brower et al. v. ALCO HARVESTING LLC et al.,, B327137, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 2nd Dist. Nov. 22, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
In Re Uber Technologies Wage and Hour Cases, A166355, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist. Sep. 28, 2023)
Uber’s and Lyft’s motions did not seek to compel arbitration of the People’s and the Labor Commissioner’s requests for civil penalties and injunctive relief, but they nonetheless asked the court to stay those portions of the actions ...
And none of the above theories supports compelling their claims to arbitration.
) As we have discussed, none of these cases holds that public law enforcement officials must arbitrate their statutory claims when they have not agreed to do so and have no preexisting relationship with the parties to the arbitration ...
Cite Document
In Re Uber Technologies Wage and Hour Cases, A166355, Opinion (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist. Sep. 28, 2023)
+ More Snippets