Search court records - party Abran Kean, page 3

Nonprecedential OPINION

Document Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, 22-1569 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2023)

“The substantial evi- dence standard asks ‘whether a reasonable fact finder could have arrived at the agency’s decision,’ and ‘involves examination of the record as a whole, taking into account evidence that both justifies and detracts from an agency’s decision.’” Id. (quoting OSI Pharms., LLC v. Apotex Inc., 939 F.3d 1375, 1381–82 (Fed. Cir. 2019)).

“The substantial evi- dence standard asks ‘whether a reasonable fact finder could have arrived at the agency’s decision,’ and ‘involves examination of the record as a whole, taking into account evidence that both justifies and detracts from an agency’s decision.’” Id. (quoting OSI Pharms., 939 F.3d at 1381–82).

“The words of a claim are generally given their ordi- nary and customary meaning as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art when read in the context of the specification and prosecution history.” Thorner v. Sony Comput.

Bot M8 further supports its arguments by citing to the prosecution history of the ’988 patent where the applicant distinguished the prior art by arguing that “the boot pro- gram and the fault inspection program are distinct.” Ap- pellant’s Br.

See ’988 patent claim 1; Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 21 F.4th 801, 810 (Fed. Cir. 2021) (“It is highly disfavored to construe terms in a way that renders them void, meaningless, or superfluous.” (quoting Wasica Fin.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- Bot M8
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel

Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. Motiva Patents, LLC

Docket IPR2019-01134, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 31, 2019)

Iftikhar Ahmed, Lynne Pettigrew, Monica Ullagaddi, presiding

Case Type	Inter Partes Review
Patent	8159354
Patent Owner	Motiva Patents, LLC
Petitioner	Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- Motiva Patents
- Sony Interactive Entertainment
Analyze Firm
- Erise IP
- Michael Best & Friedrich

No. 46 ORDER filed

Document AliveCor, Inc. v. ITC, 23-1509, No. 46 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2023)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Appeals from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1266.

Dr. Hugh Calkins and the Computer & Communica- tions Industry Association submit motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae in support of Apple Inc.

Any opposition to the motions shall be filed no later than seven days from the date of entry of this order.

Any reply is due no later than three days from the date of ser- vice of any response.

Cite Document

Analyze