• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
96 results

Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc

Docket 3:14-cv-04561, California Northern District Court (Oct. 13, 2014)
Hon. Edward J. Davila, presiding, Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6108704; 6131121
6009469
61087046131121
Plaintiff Amazon.Com, Inc.
Defendant Straight Path IP Group Inc
cite Cite Docket

Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. v. ooVoo, LLC

Docket 2:12-cv-00008, Virginia Eastern District Court ()
District Judge Robert G. Doumar, presiding, Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6513066; 6701365
6009469
65130666701365
Plaintiff Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
Defendant ooVoo, LLC
cite Cite Docket

Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. v. Vivox, Inc.

Docket 2:12-cv-00007, Virginia Eastern District Court ()
District Judge Robert G. Doumar, presiding, Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6009469; 6108704; 6131121; 6513066; 6701365
6009469
6108704613112165130666701365
Plaintiff Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
Defendant Vivox, Inc.
Counter Defendant Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket

Sony Corporation v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2014-00231, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 5, 2013)
Bryan Moore, Miriam Quinn, Stacey White, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
6009469
Petitioner Sony Corporation
Patent Owner Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Assignee STRAIGHT PATH COMMUNICATIONS INC.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 44 REDACTED ORDER 14 Denying Motion to Dismiss; Granting 14 Motion to Transfer Venue

Document Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc, 3:14-cv-04561, No. 44 (N.D.Cal. May. 28, 2015)
Presently before the Court is Defendant Straight Path IP Group, Inc.’s (“Straight Path” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff Amazon.com, Inc.’s (“Amazon” or “Plaintiff”) Complaint for Declaratory Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
Straight Path has filed numerous suits, in various jurisdictions, against consumer electronic companies based on their sale of Internet-enabled devices (e.g., SmartTVs, Blu-ray players, tablets, or smartphones) with preinstalled video-streaming applications.
The parties to the Eastern District of Virginia actions agreed that a stay pending resolution of the inter partes reviews and Straight Path’s appeal would likely narrow the issues and conserve judicial resources.
Likewise, with respect to contributory infringement, the DataTern court found that the claim charts did not impliedly assert that Microsoft’s product was not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
Amazon argues that this targeting of LGE and VIZIO by Straight Path in their infringement suits is similar to those found to support subject matter jurisdiction in DataTern.
cite Cite Document

No. 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Straight Path IP Group Inc ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt ...

Document Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc, 3:14-cv-04561, No. 1 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 13, 2014)
Complaint
Plaintiff Amazon is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, with a principal place of business at 410 Terry Avenue North, Seattle, Washington 98109-5210.
On information and belief, Straight Path is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 5300 Hickory Park Drive, Suite 218, Glen Allen, Virginia 23059.
Straight Path purports to be the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,009,469 (the “’469 pa- tent”), entitled “Graphical User Interface for Internet Telephony Application,” a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. 9.
On information and belief, Straight Path asserts that LGE directly and/or indirectly infringes one or more claims of the ’469, ’704, and ’121 patents by making, using, selling, offer- ing for sale, or importing devices that include the Amazon Instant Video software application.
An injunction against Straight Path, and all persons acting on its behalf or in concert with it, restraining them from further prosecuting or instituting any action alleging that any Ama- zon method, product, or technology, or others’ use thereof, infringes any claim of any of the pa- tents-in-suit; C. A declaration that this case is exceptional and that Amazon is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and D. Any such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and fair.
cite Cite Document

No. 45 Receipt of acknowledgment from Eastern District of Virginia

Document Amazon.Com, Inc. v. Straight Path IP Group Inc, 3:14-cv-04561, No. 45 (N.D.Cal. May. 29, 2015)
Fw: Transferred case has been opened ECFHELPDESK to: Cindy Hernandez Sent by: Bud Feria
You should only scan documents which exist only in paper.
All others should be converted to PDF directly from your computer.
For more info, please see our FAQ sections.
Transferred case has been opened CASE: 5:14-cv-04561 DETAILS: Case transferred from California Northern has been opened in Eastern District of Virginia - as case 1:15-cv-00682, filed 05/29/2015.
cite Cite Document

No. 51 OPINION AND ORDER regarding claim construction terms

Document Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc. v. Vivox, Inc., 2:12-cv-00007, No. 51 (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2012)
Motion for Claim Construction
Those sources include the words of the claims themselves, the remainder of the specification, the prosecution history, and extrinsic evidence concerning relevant scientific principles, the meaning of technical terms, and the state of the art.” I_d, (internal quotation marks omitted).
The Court FINDS that the ordinary and customary meaning of the claim tenn “network protocol address,” as understood by a person of skill in the art when read in the context ofthe entire patent, is readily apparent even to a layperson.
In their claim construction brief, the defendants contended that this term should be construed to mean “floppy disks, magnetic tapes, compact disks, or other storage media.” At hearing, the defendants verbally amended their proposed construction to add “hard disks” to the list of items they consider to be included within the scope of “computer usable medium.” The Court FINDS that the ordinary and customary meaning of the claim term “computer usable medium,” as understood by a person of skill in the art when read in the context of the entire patent, is readily apparent even to a layperson.
The Court FINDS that the ordinary and customary meaning of the claim terms “off-line message” and “online message” or “on-line message,” as understood by a person of skill in the art when read in the context of the entire patent, is readily apparent even to a layperson.
In their claim construction brief, the defendants contended that this term should be construed to mean “the server retrieves the network protocol address and identifiers from its database and sends it to the another [sic] process.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>