To institute an inter partes review, we must determine that the information presented in the Petition shows “a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).

Patent 8,095,237 B2 intrinsic parameters (i.e., focal length, image center, real pixel size, and radial and tangential distortion for the lens) and the position of the camera relative to the tool.

Petitioner then argues that one of ordinary skill in the art “would have understood that Corke’s references to ‘the image’ teaches that only features from a single captured image are used to determine the object space-to-camera space transformation.” Id. at 19 (quoting Ex. 1004, 154).

In particular, Petitioner argues that Corke describes needing “additional information” to “determine the 3D relative pose of an object ... from 2D image coordinates,” and such additional information “includes ‘knowledge of the relationship between the observed feature

Petitioner, however, does not adequately explain how or why Corke’s camera calibration matrix, C, which “represents the relationship between 3-D world coordinates and their corresponding 2-D image coordinates” (Ex. 1004, 138 (emphasis added)), would relate in any way to an “object space” (i.e., a reference frame defined with respect to, and

For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.

The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.

Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.