• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
8 results

VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM

Docket 13/680,534, U.S. Patent Application (Nov. 19, 2012)
Art Group2685
Case TypeUtility - 340/425500
Class340
Patent
8599001
Kenneth Schofield
Mark L. Larson
Applicant DONNELLY CORPORATION
...
cite Cite Docket

Trial Termination or Final Written Decision

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. IL8AAFM1RXEAPX2 (U.S. Pat. App. Feb. 22, 2016)
Theparties’ joint motion to terminate was filed prior to DOE DATES 5—7 in the proceeding, and the Board has not madea final decision on the merits.
Given these facts, we determinethat it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDEREDthatthe parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from thefile ofU.S.
Patent No. 8,599,001 B2, and madeavailable only to Federal Governmentagencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding (Paper 31) is granted and the proceeding is hereby terminated.
Jon Trembath Timothy K. Sendek A. Justin Poplin Allan Sternstein Douglas W. Link Dan ClevelandJr.
cite Cite Document

Request for Trial Granted

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. IC65VS5JPXXIFW4 (U.S. Pat. App. Jul. 9, 2015)
Petitioner explains whyit believes reversing the direction of Vellacott’s image sensor to face forward, as taught by Kenue, would have been an obvious modification to a person of ordinary skill in the art, with supporting testimony from Dr. Miller.
Third, Patent Owner argues that changing Vellacott’s orientation would renderit unsatisfactory for its intended purpose because Vellacott detects headlights in the rearward direction to “‘dim[] the rear-view and wing mirrors automatically to reduce glare to the driver.’” Prelim. Resp. 23-24 (citing Ex. 1004, 4).
We give that aspect of Dr. Miller’s testimony no weight, but conclude that Petitioner has established a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the asserted groundregardless.” Eighth, Patent Ownerargues that Vellacott and Kenue do not teach a “module attached at the windshield,” as recited in claim 1.
Further, as Patent Ownercorrectly points out, Petitioner does not explain in the Petition why it would have been obvious based on Vellacott, which faces rearwardofthe vehicle, to locate the imputer at an area swept by a windshield wiper, and merely cites Dr. Miller’s declaration.
Patent Owner doesnot explain sufficiently, however, why including Venturello’s shutter and image intensifier components are so substantial that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have considered incorporating Venturello’s fog detection, for example, into the combined device taught by the other references.
cite Cite Document

Certificate of Correction - Post Issue Communication

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. HYRN4SDPPXXIFW4 (U.S. Pat. App. Aug. 11, 2014)
: December 3, 2013 : Kenneth Schofield et al.
Page 1 of 1 It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shownbelow: In the Specification Column 29 Line 25, “mirror” should be --minor-- Column 31 Line 6, “5500)” should be --S500)-- Column 35 Line 27, “Fray” should be --Foay-- Line 37, “Fray” should be --Foay-- Signed and Sealed this Twelfth Day of August, 2014 Wivebstlhe Fo Lea Michelle K. Lee Deputy Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office
cite Cite Document

Post Issue Communication - Request for Certificate of Correction Denied

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. HYK4KRT3PXXIFW4 (U.S. Pat. App. Jul. 13, 2014)
July 14, 2014 Timothy Flory Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Flory, LLP 2851 Charlevoix Drive SE Sutte 207 Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Patent No.: Inventor(s): Issued: For: Docket No.:
Re: Request for Certificate of Correction Consideration has been given your request for the issuance of a Certificate of Correction in the above- identified patent.
The word “mirror” purported to be in column 42, line 42 cannot be found in the printed patent In view of the foregoing, your request in this matter is hereby denied.
cite Cite Document

HWDN8NITPXXIFW3

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. HWDN8NITPXXIFW3 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 12, 2014)

cite Cite Document

HWDN8NIKPXXIFW3

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. HWDN8NIKPXXIFW3 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 12, 2014)

cite Cite Document

HWDN8NI2PXXIFW3

Document VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM, 13/680,534, No. HWDN8NI2PXXIFW3 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 12, 2014)

cite Cite Document