• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
2 results

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. ZTE Corporation et al

Docket 6:15-cv-01100, Texas Eastern District Court (Nov. 30, 2015)
Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III, presiding
Patent
DivisionTyler
DemandBoth
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
6470399; 6895449; 8504746; 8966144; 9189437
6470399
6895449
850474689661449189437
Plaintiff Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG
Defendant ZTE Corporation
Defendant ZTE (USA), Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ZTE (USA), Inc., ZTE Corporation, filed by Papst Licensing GmbH & ...

Document Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. ZTE Corporation et al, 6:15-cv-01100, No. 15 (E.D.Tex. Apr. 5, 2016)
Complaint
Upon information and belief, Defendant ZTE (USA), Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, having its principal place of business located in Richardson, Texas.
ZTE is thus liable to Papst Licensing in an amount that adequately compensates it for ZTE’s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
ZTE is thus liable to Papst Licensing in an amount that adequately compensates it for ZTE’s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
ZTE is thus liable to Papst Licensing in an amount that adequately compensates it for ZTE’s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
ZTE is thus liable to Papst Licensing in an amount that adequately compensates it for ZTE’s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
cite Cite Document