• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
337 results

General Motors LLC v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00963, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 5, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner General Motors LLC
Petitioner Tesla
...
cite Cite Docket

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00793, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Mar. 30, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Petitioner General Motors
...
cite Cite Docket

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2022-01567, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 27, 2022)
Charles Boudreau, Hyun Jung, Jo-Anne Kokoski, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Petitioner Nissan North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Dell Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2021-01486, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 16, 2021)
Charles Boudreau, Matthew Meyers, Michelle Ankenbrand, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Dell Inc.
Petitioner Dell Technologies
cite Cite Docket

59 Final Written Decision original: Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a

Document IPR2022-01567, No. 59 Final Written Decision original - Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a (P.T.A.B. Nov. 1, 2024)
According to the ’450 Patent, the MAP scheduling method defined by the IEEE 802.16 standard involves significant control overhead, amounting altogether to 52 bits, representing as much as 32.5% of overall data communication for application such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) and resulting in a relatively low spectral efficiency.
Patent Owner contends that its arguments and the Board’s decision in the IPR2021-01486 distinguishing prior art that is materially identical to Vijayan089 and Vijayan475 on the basis that separate time and frequency coordinates do not disclose the claimed “time-frequency coordinate” is sufficient to create a disclaimer.
According to Petitioner, “[r]ather than being limited to sending separate time and frequency coordinates, Figure 7B identifies the starting position for a segment and the number of units in that segment.” Pet.
In the alternative, Petitioner contends that Wu explicitly discloses the recited “assigning” step, citing Wu’s disclosures of a base station assigning a UE identifier to a mobile device via a control channel in an OFDM system.
Patent 10,447,450 B2 Based on the entire record, we are not persuaded that Vijayan475 teaches or suggests “a starting time-frequency coordinate” in accordance with the correct plain and ordinary meaning that disclaims separate time and frequency coordinates.
cite Cite Document

58 Notice Other: Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 00962

Document IPR2022-01567, No. 58 Notice Other - Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 00962 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 12, 2024)
General Motors LLC and Nissan North America Inc. (collectively “Petitioner”) filed a Petition requesting inter partes review of claims 7 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 10,447,450 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’450 Patent”).
According to the ’450 Patent, the MAP scheduling method defined by the IEEE 802.16 standard involves significant control overhead, amounting altogether to 52 bits, representing as much as 32.5% of overall data communication for application such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) and resulting in a relatively low spectral efficiency.
Claim 7 is representative and is reproduced below: A mobile device in a wireless packet system using a frame structure of multiple frames for transmission, each frame comprising a plurality of time intervals, each time interval comprising a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols, and each OFDM symbol containing a plurality of frequency subcarriers, the mobile device configured to: receive an identifier from a base station in a cell in which the mobile device is operating; and receive a signal containing information from the base station over a segment of time-frequency resource, the segment having a starting time-frequency coordinate and the segment comprising N time-frequency resource units within a time interval, each unit containing a set of frequency subcarriers in a group of OFDM symbols, where N=2, 4, or 8; and
Patent 10,447,450 B2 “To join a party to an instituted [inter partes review (IPR)], the plain language of § 315(c) requires two different decisions.” Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, 973 F.3d 1321, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2020).
5 General Motors LLC and Nissan North America, Inc. were joined as a petitioner to this proceeding based on a petition and motion for joinder filed in IPR2023-00962, which were granted.
cite Cite Document

11 Final Written Decision original: Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a

Document IPR2023-00963, No. 11 Final Written Decision original - Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a (P.T.A.B. Nov. 1, 2024)
According to the ’450 Patent, the MAP scheduling method defined by the IEEE 802.16 standard involves significant control overhead, amounting altogether to 52 bits, representing as much as 32.5% of overall data communication for application such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) and resulting in a relatively low spectral efficiency.
Patent Owner contends that its arguments and the Board’s decision in the IPR2021-01486 distinguishing prior art that is materially identical to Vijayan089 and Vijayan475 on the basis that separate time and frequency coordinates do not disclose the claimed “time-frequency coordinate” is sufficient to create a disclaimer.
According to Petitioner, “[r]ather than being limited to sending separate time and frequency coordinates, Figure 7B identifies the starting position for a segment and the number of units in that segment.” Pet.
In the alternative, Petitioner contends that Wu explicitly discloses the recited “assigning” step, citing Wu’s disclosures of a base station assigning a UE identifier to a mobile device via a control channel in an OFDM system.
Patent 10,447,450 B2 Based on the entire record, we are not persuaded that Vijayan475 teaches or suggests “a starting time-frequency coordinate” in accordance with the correct plain and ordinary meaning that disclaims separate time and frequency coordinates.
cite Cite Document

12 Final Written Decision original: Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a

Document IPR2023-00793, No. 12 Final Written Decision original - Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a (P.T.A.B. Nov. 1, 2024)
According to the ’450 Patent, the MAP scheduling method defined by the IEEE 802.16 standard involves significant control overhead, amounting altogether to 52 bits, representing as much as 32.5% of overall data communication for application such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) and resulting in a relatively low spectral efficiency.
Patent Owner contends that its arguments and the Board’s decision in the IPR2021-01486 distinguishing prior art that is materially identical to Vijayan089 and Vijayan475 on the basis that separate time and frequency coordinates do not disclose the claimed “time-frequency coordinate” is sufficient to create a disclaimer.
According to Petitioner, “[r]ather than being limited to sending separate time and frequency coordinates, Figure 7B identifies the starting position for a segment and the number of units in that segment.” Pet.
In the alternative, Petitioner contends that Wu explicitly discloses the recited “assigning” step, citing Wu’s disclosures of a base station assigning a UE identifier to a mobile device via a control channel in an OFDM system.
Patent 10,447,450 B2 Based on the entire record, we are not persuaded that Vijayan475 teaches or suggests “a starting time-frequency coordinate” in accordance with the correct plain and ordinary meaning that disclaims separate time and frequency coordinates.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>