• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
305 results

Google LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2022-00359, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 6, 2022)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Google LLC
Petitioner LG Electronics
cite Cite Docket

LG Electronics, Inc. v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2022-00091, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Nov. 5, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc.
Petitioner Google
cite Cite Docket

Apple Inc. v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2021-00920, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 21, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, Kristi Sawert, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Apple Inc.
Petitioner Google
...
cite Cite Docket

Unified Patents, LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners, LLC

Docket IPR2021-00917, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (May 14, 2021)
Brent Dougal, Joni Chang, Kevin Turner, Kristi Sawert, Scott Raevsky, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7933431
Patent Owner Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Petitioner Unified Patents, LLC
cite Cite Docket

32 Order Other: Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR § 425

Document IPR2021-00917, No. 32 Order Other - Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR § 425 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 16, 2022)
a. BACKGROUND FACTS The Petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,933,431 (“the ’431 patent”) in the present case was filed on March 14, 2021.
Patent Owner argued that the identity of Petitioner’s members was material to the analysis of whether or not to institute the present inter partes review.
Thus, Patent Owner chose to exclude real party-in- interest and privity as issues to be addressed during the trial phase of the present proceeding.
Even if we were to go back to October, when Patent Owner first made its request, at that time all briefs from the parties had been submitted and the oral hearing had been conducted.
Patent Owner reasons that the Board can order Petitioner to provide discovery regarding its relationship with Samsung.
cite Cite Document

28 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2021-00920, No. 28 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2022)

cite Cite Document

8 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2022-00359, No. 8 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2022)

cite Cite Document

27 Other Hearing transcript: Other Hearing transcript

Document IPR2021-00920, No. 27 Other Hearing transcript - Other Hearing transcript (P.T.A.B. Nov. 28, 2022)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>