• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
80 results

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation v. MiMedx Group, Inc.

Docket IPR2015-00669, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 2, 2015)
Christopher Paulraj, Lora Green, Susan Mitchell, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8323701
Patent Owner MiMedx Group, Inc.
Petitioner Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
Petitioner Medline Industries
...
cite Cite Docket

20 Notice: Notice of Refund

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 20 Notice - Notice of Refund (P.T.A.B. Jan. 20, 2016)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on 02/02/2015 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $14,000 has been refunded to the Petitioner’s deposit account.
Case IPR2015-00669 Patent 8,323,701 The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
For the PATENT OWNER:
cite Cite Document

18 Notice: Decision Denying Petitioners Request for Rehearing

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 18 Notice - Decision Denying Petitioners Request for Rehearing (P.T.A.B. Dec. 22, 2015)
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation filed a corrected Petition requesting an inter partes review of claims 1, 2, and 5–8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,323,701 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’701 patent”).
As we noted in the Institution Decision: We agree with Patent Owner that Petitioner has not demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that the combination of Wei, Tseng, Sulner, or Shenaq renders the challenged claims obvious.
Thus, we agree with Patent Owner that the ordinary artisan would [not, sic] read the disclosure of Wei as retaining the fibroblast cellular layer.
Petitioner also does not point to any evidence that we overlooked that supports its contention that the ordinary artisan would understand that leaving the fibroblast cells on the amnion would also lead to reduced immunogenicity.
Thus, Petitioner argues, “the spongy layer portions staying attached to the chorion are removed from the now separated amnion, thereby exposing, at least partially, the underlying fibroblast layer.” Id. at 13.
cite Cite Document

14 Notice: Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR 425

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 14 Notice - Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR 425 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 18, 2015)
A conference call was held was held on Wednesday, August 5, 2015, between John Kim, Ralph Selitto, and Eric Bleich, counsel for Petitioner; Keith Broyles, Pamela Councill, and Jason Cooper, counsel for Patent Owner; and Administrative Patent Judges Green, Mitchell, and Paulraj.
In fact, Petitioner argues, in the Notice of Filing Date Accorded, the Board listed Snoasis as the Patent Owner in the caption.
When we asked what the remedy should be, Petitioner suggested that MiMedx should not be allowed to appear for Patent Owner or file a Preliminary Response.
At this point, Snoasis has not made any appearance in the case, and is thus a third party to the proceeding over which we have no jurisdiction to join it as a real party-in-interest as a Patent Owner.
In that regard, we note that Petitioner stated that there is concurrent district court litigation, where it is exploring any ongoing relationship between MiMedx and Snoasis.
cite Cite Document

13 Institution Decision: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 13 Institution Decision - Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Aug. 18, 2015)

cite Cite Document

6 Order: Errata

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 6 Order - Errata (P.T.A.B. Mar. 9, 2015)

cite Cite Document

3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petitio...

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (P.T.A.B. Feb. 20, 2015)

cite Cite Document

17 Reply: Petitioners Reply in Support of Petitioners Request for Rehearing

Document IPR2015-00669, No. 17 Reply - Petitioners Reply in Support of Petitioners Request for Rehearing (P.T.A.B. Oct. 12, 2015)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 6 >>