• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
558 results

General Motors LLC v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00962, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 5, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner General Motors LLC
Petitioner Nissan North America
cite Cite Docket

General Motors LLC v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00963, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 5, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner General Motors LLC
Petitioner Tesla
...
cite Cite Docket

Neo Wireless LLC v. LG Electronics Inc. et al

Docket 6:21-cv-00025, Texas Western District Court (Jan. 13, 2021)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
10044517; 10075941; 10447450; 10587336; 10833908; 8027243; 8428018; 8467366; 9059813
10447450
8027243842801884673669059813
Plaintiff Neo Wireless LLC
Defendant LG Electronics Inc.
Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00793, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Mar. 30, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Petitioner General Motors
...
cite Cite Docket

Ford Motor Company v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00763, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Mar. 29, 2023)
Charles Boudreau, Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
DeadlineDUE DATE 2: February 27, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
DeadlineDUE DATE 3: April 10, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Ford Motor Company
Petitioner Nissan North America
cite Cite Docket

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2022-01567, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 27, 2022)
Charles Boudreau, Hyun Jung, Jo-Anne Kokoski, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Petitioner Nissan North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Dell Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2021-01486, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 16, 2021)
Charles Boudreau, Matthew Meyers, Michelle Ankenbrand, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Dell Inc.
Petitioner Dell Technologies
cite Cite Docket

59 Final Written Decision original: Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a

Document IPR2022-01567, No. 59 Final Written Decision original - Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable 35 USC § 318a (P.T.A.B. Nov. 1, 2024)
According to the ’450 Patent, the MAP scheduling method defined by the IEEE 802.16 standard involves significant control overhead, amounting altogether to 52 bits, representing as much as 32.5% of overall data communication for application such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) and resulting in a relatively low spectral efficiency.
Patent Owner contends that its arguments and the Board’s decision in the IPR2021-01486 distinguishing prior art that is materially identical to Vijayan089 and Vijayan475 on the basis that separate time and frequency coordinates do not disclose the claimed “time-frequency coordinate” is sufficient to create a disclaimer.
According to Petitioner, “[r]ather than being limited to sending separate time and frequency coordinates, Figure 7B identifies the starting position for a segment and the number of units in that segment.” Pet.
In the alternative, Petitioner contends that Wu explicitly discloses the recited “assigning” step, citing Wu’s disclosures of a base station assigning a UE identifier to a mobile device via a control channel in an OFDM system.
Patent 10,447,450 B2 Based on the entire record, we are not persuaded that Vijayan475 teaches or suggests “a starting time-frequency coordinate” in accordance with the correct plain and ordinary meaning that disclaims separate time and frequency coordinates.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>