`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www .uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`90/013,239
`
`
`
`
` FILING DATE
`
`05/14/2014
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKETNO.
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`7593812
`
`GRCP.022015
`
`1705
`
`KLEIN, O'NEILL. & SINGH, LIP aee
`PAIR
`Tp
`TL.
`KLE
`18200 VON KARMAN AVENUE
`TARAE, CATHERINE MICHELLE
`SUITE 725
`IRVINE, CA 92612
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`3992
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`03/27/2015
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Corarnissioner for Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1440
`wunUSPTO.gow
`
`DO NOT USE IN PALM PRINTER
`
`(THIRD PARTY REQUESTER'S CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS)
`
`Erise IP, P.A.
`
`5600 GreenwoodPlaza Blvd.
`
`Suite 200
`
`GreenwoodVillage, CO 80111
`
`EX PARTE REEXAMINATION COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTAL FORM
`
`REEXAMINATION CONTROL NO. 90/013,239.
`
`PATENT NO. 7593812.
`
`ART UNIT 3992.
`
`Enclosed is a copy of the latest communication from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office in the above identified ex parte reexamination proceeding (37 CFR 1.550(f)).
`
`Wherethis copy is supplied after the reply by requester, 37 CFR 1.535, orthe timeforfiling a
`reply has passed, no submission on behalf of the ex parte reexamination requester will be
`acknowledgedor considered (37 CFR 1.550(g)).
`
`PTOL-465 (Rev.07-04)
`
`

`

`
`Control No.
`Patent Under Reexamination
`
` Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary| 90/013,239 7593812
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`MICHELLE TARAE
`
`3992
`
`All participants (USPTO personnel, patent owner, patent owner's representative):
`
`(1) MICHELLE TARAE (USPTO)
`
`(2) Woo Choi, Deandra Hughes (USPTO)
`
`Date of Interview: 79 March 2015
`
`b)[_] Video Conference
`Type: a)L] Telephonic
`c)X] Personal (copy given to: 1)L] patent owner
`
`(3) Michael Guiliana (42,611)
`
`(4) Glenn Nuttall (46,188)
`
`—_2)[_] patent owner's representative)
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: d)L] Yes—e)X] No.
`
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`Agreementwith respect to the claims f)_] was reached. g)X] wasnotreached. h)L] N/A.
`Any other agreement(s) are set forth below under “Description of the general nature of what was agreedto...”
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 10 and 71.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: Human Factors, SkyMap.
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`Mr, Guiliana discussed the issues identified in the attached interview agenda. Examinerwill consider and address the
`arguments when they are formally filed.
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims
`patentable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims
`patentable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)
`
`A FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION MUST INCLUDE PATENT OWNER’S
`STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. (See MPEP § 2281). IF ARESPONSE TO THE
`LAST OFFICE ACTION HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED, THEN PATENT OWNER IS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS
`INTERVIEW DATE TO PROVIDE THE MANDATORY STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW
`(37 CFR 1.560(b)). THE REQUIREMENT FOR PATENT OWNER'’S STATEMENT CAN NOTBE WAIVED.
`EXTENSIONS OF TIME ARE GOVERNED BY37 CFR 1.550(c).
`
` cc: Requester (if third party requester)
`
`/MICHELLE TARAE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-474 (Rev. 04-01)
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20150320
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket