`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www .uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`90/013,239
`
`
`
`
` FILING DATE
`
`05/14/2014
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKETNO.
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`7593812
`
`GRCP.022015
`
`1705
`
`KLEIN, O'NEILL. & SINGH, LIP aee
`PAIR
`Tp
`TL.
`KLE
`18200 VON KARMAN AVENUE
`TARAE, CATHERINE MICHELLE
`SUITE 725
`IRVINE, CA 92612
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`3992
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`03/27/2015
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Corarnissioner for Patents
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1440
`wunUSPTO.gow
`
`DO NOT USE IN PALM PRINTER
`
`(THIRD PARTY REQUESTER'S CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS)
`
`Erise IP, P.A.
`
`5600 GreenwoodPlaza Blvd.
`
`Suite 200
`
`GreenwoodVillage, CO 80111
`
`EX PARTE REEXAMINATION COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTAL FORM
`
`REEXAMINATION CONTROL NO. 90/013,239.
`
`PATENT NO. 7593812.
`
`ART UNIT 3992.
`
`Enclosed is a copy of the latest communication from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office in the above identified ex parte reexamination proceeding (37 CFR 1.550(f)).
`
`Wherethis copy is supplied after the reply by requester, 37 CFR 1.535, orthe timeforfiling a
`reply has passed, no submission on behalf of the ex parte reexamination requester will be
`acknowledgedor considered (37 CFR 1.550(g)).
`
`PTOL-465 (Rev.07-04)
`
`

`

`
`Control No.
`Patent Under Reexamination
`
` Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary| 90/013,239 7593812
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`MICHELLE TARAE
`
`3992
`
`All participants (USPTO personnel, patent owner, patent owner's representative):
`
`(1) MICHELLE TARAE (USPTO)
`
`(2) Woo Choi, Deandra Hughes (USPTO)
`
`Date of Interview: 79 March 2015
`
`b)[_] Video Conference
`Type: a)L] Telephonic
`c)X] Personal (copy given to: 1)L] patent owner
`
`(3) Michael Guiliana (42,611)
`
`(4) Glenn Nuttall (46,188)
`
`—_2)[_] patent owner's representative)
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: d)L] Yes—e)X] No.
`
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`Agreementwith respect to the claims f)_] was reached. g)X] wasnotreached. h)L] N/A.
`Any other agreement(s) are set forth below under “Description of the general nature of what was agreedto...”
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 10 and 71.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: Human Factors, SkyMap.
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`Mr, Guiliana discussed the issues identified in the attached interview agenda. Examinerwill consider and address the
`arguments when they are formally filed.
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims
`patentable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims
`patentable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)
`
`A FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION MUST INCLUDE PATENT OWNER’S
`STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. (See MPEP § 2281). IF ARESPONSE TO THE
`LAST OFFICE ACTION HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED, THEN PATENT OWNER IS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS
`INTERVIEW DATE TO PROVIDE THE MANDATORY STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW
`(37 CFR 1.560(b)). THE REQUIREMENT FOR PATENT OWNER'’S STATEMENT CAN NOTBE WAIVED.
`EXTENSIONS OF TIME ARE GOVERNED BY37 CFR 1.550(c).
`
` cc: Requester (if third party requester)
`
`/MICHELLE TARAE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-474 (Rev. 04-01)
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20150320
`
`