`
`1.
`
`Reproduction 1.8 has been amendedto disclaim the beater blades, and the specification
`
`has been amended to includea brokenline statement, as suggested by the Examiner. No new
`
`matter has been added.
`
`Claim Rejections 35 U.S.C. § 112
`
`2.
`
`The Examinerrejected the claim under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (a) and (b) as beingindefinite
`
`and non-enabling. Specifically, the Examinerasserted that the scope of protection sought by the
`
`claim cannot be understood due to the beater blades depicted in Reproduction 1.8. Without
`
`acquiescenceto the Examinerassertion, Reproduction 1.8 has been amendedto convert the
`
`beater blades to brokenline, deemphasize the area betweenthe broken lines and to rotate the
`
`orientation of the reproduction such that it fits within the margin requirements . The specification
`
`has also been amendedto include the brokenline statement as suggested by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant respectfully requests that the rejections be reconsidered and withdrawnin view ofthe
`
`amendment.
`
`115332-5271-US
`
`4
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`3.
`
`Each and every ground of each objection and rejection in the outstanding office action
`
`has been addressed herein. To the extent a particular argument in support of an objection or
`
`rejection by the Examineris not expressly addressed, that argument is moot in view of the
`
`foregoing and Applicant does not acquiesce to any such argument.
`
`In view of the foregoing Amendment and remarks, Applicant respectfully submits that
`
`the present application is in condition for allowance and such action is respectfully requested.
`
`Should the Examiner determine otherwise, Applicant’s representatives request a telephone
`
`interview in order to expedite prosecution of the application.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Sandhal A. Olds/
`SANDHALA. OLDS
`Registration No. 78,272
`JOHN L. HEMMER
`Registration No. 58,752
`Attorney for Applicant
`
`
`Date: December 15, 2021
`
`By:
`
`MORGAN,LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1701 MarketStreet
`Philadelphia, PA 19103-2921
`Direct Dial: (215) 963-5899
`Customer No. 28977
`
`115332-5271-US
`
`5
`
`Response to Office Action
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
