`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`29/864,570
`
`06/06/2022
`
`Rory T. McDonnell
`
`258017
`
`5518
`
`Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP
`1000 Jackson Street
`Toledo, OH 43604-5573
`
`YENCHESKY, RICHARD EDWIN
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2911
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`11/21/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`cgolupski@ shumaker.com
`dmiller@shumaker.com
`
`tlopez@ shumaker.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`29/864,570
`McDonnell et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`RICHARD E YENCHESKY
`2911
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 2 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1)C Responsive to communication(s) filed on
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)C) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on__; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporatedinto this action.
`4)\(/| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`11 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`) ©) Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`) 0 Claim(s
`)
`is/are rejected.
`Claim(s) 1 is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`“If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)C2 The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)M The drawing(s) filed on 10/30/2023 is/are: a)(] accepted or b)M objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1... Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) ([] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20231115
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 29/864,570
`Art Unit: 2911
`
`Page 2
`
`Examiner’s Comment
`The amendment, received 10/30/2023, has been considered and acknowledged by the
`examiner. Due to the amendment,the claim rejection under 35 USC 112(a) and (b) has been
`overcome.
`
`Ex Parte Quayle Action
`This application is in condition for allowance except for the following formal matters:
`
`Drawing Objection
`The broken lines in FIG. 11, which were added in the amendmentto the drawing disclosure,
`have inconsistent line width and poor line quality that need to be corrected. There are a few
`portions of the design that still need to be converted to broken line. There are also existing
`lines of poor line quality that need to be addressed. See the annotated images below:
`
`INCONSISTENT AND POOR
`
`LINE OUALITY
`
`INCONSISTENT AND POGR
`
`LINEQUALITY
`
`BeGRa)
`Frey
`
`sah
`
`f
`
`; AE:a yy THIS PORTION NEEDS TO BE
`
`CONVERTED TO BROKEN LINE
`
`i
`iy
`
`22 ff em SCOR LINE QUALITY
`2
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 29/864,570
`Art Unit: 2911
`
`Page 3
`
`
`+i]f
`~ H
`_*
`PPencONSISTENT AND FOOR
`ys—AS
`
`‘'
`
`‘
`
`oa
`
`:
`
`~
`
`
`
`
`aaa
`
`a
`
`LINE QUALITY
`
`
`
`INCONSISTENT AND POOR
`
`LINE QUALITY
`
`The drawings must be correctedto illustrate the design in clean, smooth lines and the broken
`lines shown clearly with sufficient breaks between line segments. Correction is required, 37 CFR
`1.84.
`
`Conclusion
`Prosecution on the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 25
`USPQ 74, 453 0.G. 213, (Comm’r Pat. 1935).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire TWO (2) MONTHS from the
`mailing date of this letter. Extensions of time may be granted under 37 CFR 1.136 but in no case
`can any extension carry the date for reply to this Office action beyond the maximum period of
`SIX MONTHS set by statute (35 U.S.C. 133).
`
`Contact Information
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`should be directed to RICHARD E YENCHESKY whosetelephone number is (571)272-6580. The
`examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30-5:00.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 29/864,570
`Art Unit: 2911
`
`Page 4
`
`encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at
`http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`George Bugg can be reached on 571-272-2998. The fax phone number for the organization
`wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained
`from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to
`registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,visit:
`https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for
`moreinformation about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for
`information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO
`Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/R.E.Y./
`Examiner, Art Unit 2911
`
`/KEVIN K RUDZINSKI/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2911
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site